Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T14:39:28.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and dynamic analysis of landing mechanism for crew lunar vehicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2025

Q. Zhao
Affiliation:
College of Astronautics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China
C. Lu
Affiliation:
College of Astronautics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China
Y. Hong
Affiliation:
Aerospace System Engineering Shanghai, Shanghai, 201109, China
J. Chen
Affiliation:
College of Astronautics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China National Key Laboratory of Aerospace Mechanism, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China Key Laboratory of Exploration Mechanism of the Deep Space Planet Surface, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China
C. Wang*
Affiliation:
College of Astronautics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China National Key Laboratory of Aerospace Mechanism, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China Key Laboratory of Exploration Mechanism of the Deep Space Planet Surface, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China
*
Corresponding author: C. Wang; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Manned lunar landers must ensure astronaut safety while enhancing payload capacity. Due to traditional landers being weak in high-impact energy absorb and heavy payload capacity, a Starship-type manned lunar lander is proposed in this paper. Firstly, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on the traditional cantilever beam cushioning mechanism for manned lander. Subsequently, a 26-ton manned lander and its landing mechanism were designed, and a rigid-flexible coupling dynamic analysis was performed on the compression process of the primary and auxiliary legs. Secondly, the landing performance of the proposed Starship-type manned lunar lander was compared with the traditional 14-ton manned lander in multiple landing conditions. The results indicate that under normal conditions, the largest acceleration of the proposed 26-ton Starship-type manned lander decreases more than 13.1%. It enables a significant increase in payload capacity while mitigating impact loads under various landing conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Niu, R., Zhang, G., Mu, L., Lin, Y., Liu, J., Bo, Z., Dai, W. and Zhang, P. Scientific objectives and suggestions on landing site selection of manned lunar exploration engineering, J. Astronaut., 2023, 44, pp 12801290.Google Scholar
Peng, Q., Wang, P. and Xing, L. Considerations on several issues of China’s manned lunar scientific research and test station, J. Astronaut., 2023, 44, pp 14361446.Google Scholar
Wang, K., Xin, P., Wang, C. and Pan, B. Design and verification of integrated suspension for landing and moving of manned lunar mobility system, J. Astronaut., 2023, 44, pp 14011410.Google Scholar
Feng, F., Wang, J., Zhu, Y., Li, X. and Wang, Y. Overview of foreign propulsion system programs for manned lunar landings, Aerosp. China, 2023, 11, pp 3342.Google Scholar
Liao, X. and Li, J. Review of manned spaceflight development abroad in 2023, Mann. Spaceflight, 2024, 30, pp 112120.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., He, Y., Song, N. and Cui, W. Progress of the U.S. Artemis lunar program, Space Electron. Technol., 2022, 19, pp 7584.Google Scholar
Yoo, J. Characteristics of Starship system development, J. Korean Soc. Propul. Eng., 2021, 25, 5364.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Wang, P., Hou, Z., Peng, C. and Yu, H. Analysis of manned deep space exploration of SpaceX’s Starship spacecraft, J. Astronaut., 2023, 44, pp 814819.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Zhang, H., Wu, X., Li, F., Yang, M., Cheng, M., Xu, Y. and Zhang, Y. Flight results of Chang’E-4 lander summary and evaluation, Sci. Sin. (Technol.), 2019, 49, pp 13971407.Google Scholar
Durga, P.K., Bhatt, M;, Ambily, G., Sathyan, S., Misra, D., Srivastava, N. and Bhardwaj, A. Contextual characterization study of Chandrayaan-3 primary landing site, Month. Notices R. Astronom. Soci.: Lett., 2023, 526, pp L116L123.Google Scholar
Danieli, P., Masi, M., Tridello, R., Pessana, M., Barato, F. and Chiesa, A. Conceptual design of the electric pumps for the high-performance engine of a European lunar lander, Turbo Expo: Power Land Sea Air. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., 2023, 87110: V13DT35A023.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Nie, H., Chen, J. and Lee, H.P. The design and dynamic analysis of a lunar lander with semi-active control, Acta Astronaut., 2019, 157, pp 145156 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Chen, J., Li, X., Nie, H. and Lin, F. Design, dynamic analysis, and experiments of MRF dampers for lunar landers, Adv. Space Res., 2021, 68, pp 30123025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Jia, S., Chen, J. and Chen, M. Motion and trajectory planning modeling for mobile landing mechanism systems based on improved genetic algorithm, Math. Biosci. Eng., 2021, 18, pp 231252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Ma, H., Chen, J. and Tian, S. Motion characteristics and gait planning methods analysis for the walkable lunar lander to optimize the performances of terrain adaptability, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2023, 132, p 108030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, S., Zhao, J., Hu, R., Chen, J., Zhou, X. and Zhang, S. Design optimization and simulation of reusable small lunar lander, J. Astronaut., 2023, 43, pp 356365.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Chen, J., Dong, Z., Chen, H., Yuan, Y. and Zhu, J. Design and performance analysis of the cat-inspired lunar landing mechanism, J. Astronaut., 2023, 43, pp 13021310.Google Scholar
Connolly, J.F. After LM:NASA lunar lander concepts beyond Apollo. Houston: Johnson Space Center, 2019.Google Scholar
Peng, Q., Wang, P. and Xing, L. Perspectives on China’s manned lunar scientific research and test station, Adv. Astronaut. Sci. Technol., 2024, 7, pp 5164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, X., Zhang, C., Xu, W., Yuan, J., Zhang, Y., Bu, S., Shi, F. and Zhang, C. A comprehensive evaluation method for manned lunar exploration activities, in 2024 43rd Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Kunming, Yunnan, China: IEEE, 2024, pp 70517058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M., Craig, D., Herrmann, N., Mahoney, E., Krezel, J., McIntyre, N. and Goodliff, K. The Artemis program: an overview of NASA’s activities to return humans to the moon, in 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA: IEEE, 2020, pp 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, W., Zhou, W., Deng, X. and Li, G. Research on integrated mission planning and design method for manned lunar exploration, J. Astronaut., 2023, 44, pp 12911304.Google Scholar
Meng, G., Liu, C., Yang, D., Zhou, C. and Zhou, H. First flight of SpaceX heavy-lift starship: enlightenment for aerospace industry in China, Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin., 2023, 44, pp 616.Google Scholar
Li, M., Deng, Z., Liu, R. and Guo, H. Crashworthiness design optimisation of metal honeycomb energy absorber used in lunar lander, Int. J. Crashworth., 2011, 16, pp 411419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., Jia, S. and Chen, J. Parametric analysis and performance optimization of landing–moving integrated gear for mobile lunar lander, J. Aerosp. Eng., 2025, 38, p 04024098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar