Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:53:45.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and construction of aeroelastic wind tunnel models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

G. Stenfelt  and
U. Ringertz
U. Ringertz*
Affiliation:
Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The design and building of accurately scaled aeroelastic wind-tunnel models is difficult, time consuming and very costly. With the increasing usefulness of computational methods for predicting aeroelastic phenomena, few complex models have been built in recent years. New fighter aircraft projects are also becoming more and more scarce, and transport aircraft have essentially the same configuration since half a decade. This also significantly reduces the need for aeroelastic wind-tunnel models. However, there still is an interest in the results from aeroelastic testing. In some cases new and radical configurations may warrant wind-tunnel testing and in other cases complex phenomena arising in fight testing may need carefully performed experiments to resolve problems. However, there is definitely a trend towards building models and performing testing in the support of the development of computational methods.

The developments in computer technology do not only improve the computational methods for aeroelasticity. Modern Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing techniques can significantly improve the quality and efficiency of the design and build process for aeroelastic models. There have also been some recent improvements in measurement techniques which have proven very useful for testing of aeroelastic wind-tunnel models. The paper will present some new design and build techniques developed for the manufacturing of a large scale wind-tunnel model of a canard delta wing fighter aircraft configuration. In the build process fiber-reinforced composites will be used, hence, challenges and possible solutions concerning the ability to produce a model with well defined material properties and fiber angles will be discussed. Further challenges arise when both measurement equipment and adjustable control surfaces should be attached inside the model using techniques that are possible to describe with computational methods. In addition, equipment, such as pressure taps, and control surface mechanics need to fit and function in a flexible structure. As a result, the above requirements will lead to necessary compromises in the design, hence, the paper will present the choices taken during the build process and for which reasons. The use of an optical positioning measurement system will also be discussed for both the validation of model properties and non-contact measurement of model deformations during wind-tunnel testing.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 119 , Issue 1222: A Rotorcraft Special Issue , December 2015 , pp. 1585 - 1599
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Denegri, C.M. Jr, Limit cycle oscillation flight test results of a fighter with external stores, J Aircraft, 2000, 37 (5), pp 761–769.Google Scholar
2.Edwards, J.W., Schuster, D.M., Spain, C.V., Keller, D.F. and Moses, R.W. MAVRIC flutter model transonic limit cycle oscillation test. Technical Report NASA/TM-2001-210877, NASA, 2001.Google Scholar
3.Tomac, M. and Eller, D. From geometry to CFD grids— An automated approach for conceptual design. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011.Google Scholar
4.Eller, D.An efficient boundary element method for unsteady low-speed aerodynamics in the time domain. TRITA/AVE 2005:40, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden, December 200Google Scholar
5.Modin, K.E. and U. Clareus, U.Aerodynamic design evolution of the SAAB JAS 39 Gripen aircraft. AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aircraft design systems and operations meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, US, September 23-25, 1991.Google Scholar
6.Eliasson, P.EDGE, a Navier-Stokes solver for unstructured grids. Proc. to Finite Volumes for Complex Applications III, ISBN, 1(9039):9634, 2002.Google Scholar
7. Lessons in the Design and characterization testing of the semi-span super-sonic transport (S T) wind-tunnel model, 2012. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
8.Stenfelt, G.Aerodynamics and Lateral Control of Tailless Aircraft. PhD thesis, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, March 2012.Google Scholar
9.Jansson, N. and Stenfelt, G.Steady and unsteady pressure measurements on a swept-wing aircraft. Technical Report TRITA/AVE 2011:91, Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, 2011.Google Scholar
10. Pressure Systems, Inc. ESP Pressure Scanner Users’s Manual. August 2009.Google Scholar
11.Huebner, A.R.Bergmann, A. and Loeser, T. Experimental and numerical investigations of unsteady force and pressure distributions of moving transport aircraft configurations. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, January 2009. AIAA paper 2009-91.Google Scholar
12. National Instruments. Operating instructions and specifications CompactRIO NI cRIO-9025, November 2009. www.ni.com.Google Scholar
13.Johnson, G.W.LabVIEW Graphical Programming, McGraw-Hill, 2006.Google Scholar
14. Measurement specialties. DTC Initium Networkable wind tunnel electronic pressure scanning, June 2012. Data sheet, www.meas-spec.com.Google Scholar
15. National Instruments. NI PXIe-8135 User manual and specifications, June 2012. www.ni.com.Google Scholar
16. Qualisys AB. Oqus - Qualisys motion capture camera with high-speed video. Product Information 100, 300 and 500 series, 2011.Google Scholar
17. Nx nastran 8 quick reference guide, 2011.Google Scholar