Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:24:33.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Critical Height of Distributed Roughness to Cause Boundary Layer Transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. L. Dommett
R. L. Dommett*
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been found that there is a critical height for “sandpaper” type roughness below which no measurable disturbances are introduced into a laminar boundary layer and above which transition is initiated at the roughness. Braslow and Knox have proposed a method of predicting this height, for flow over a flat plate or a cone, using exact solutions of the laminar boundary layer equations combined with a correlation of experimental results in terms of a Reynolds number based on roughness height, k, and local conditions at the top of the elements. A simpler, yet more general, method can be constructed by taking additional advantage of the linearity of the velocity profile near the wall in a laminar boundary layer.

Type
Technical Notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 63 , Issue 588 , December 1959 , pp. 722
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Klebanoff, P. S., Schubauer, G. B. and Tidstrom, K. D. (1955). Measurement of the effect of two-dimensional and three-dimensional roughness effects on boundary layer transition. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences ,Vol. 22, No. 11, p . 803, November 1955.Google Scholar
2.Von Doenhoff, A. E. and Horton, E. A. (1956). A low speed investigation of the effect of a sandpaper type of roughness on boundary layer transition. N.A.C.A. Report 1349 (revised version of T.N. 3858), 1956.Google Scholar
3.Braslow, A. L. and E. C., Knox (1958). Simplified method for determining the critical height of distributed roughness particles for boundary layer transition at Mach numbers from 0 to 5. N.A.C.A. T.N. 4363, September 1958.Google Scholar
4.Braslow, A. L. (1958). Effect of distributed granular type roughness on boundary layer transition at supersonic speeds with and without surface cooling. N.A.C.A. RM L58A17 (TIL 5763), Unclassified, March 1958.Google Scholar
5.Schwartzberg, M. A. and Braslow, A. L. (1952). Experimental study of the effects of finite surface disturbances and angle of attack on the laminar boundary layer of a N.A.C.A. 64A010 airfoil with area suction. N.A.C.A. T.N. 2796, 1952.Google Scholar
6.Dryden, H. L. (1953). Review of published data on the effect of roughness on transition from laminar to turbulent flow. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 7. p. 477, July 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar