Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:14:42.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of plume interference effects on axisymmetric afterbodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

Y-K Lee ,
S. Raghunathan ,
E. Benard ,
H-D Kim  and
T. Setoguchi
Y-K Lee
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast UK
S. Raghunathan
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast UK
E. Benard
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast UK
H-D Kim
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Andong National University, Andong, Korea
T. Setoguchi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saga University, Saga, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plume interference effects on the axisymmetric flowfields around powered missiles are investigated using computational techniques. The study is mainly to understand the physics of the plume-induced shock and separation particularly at high plume to exit pressure ratios with and without shock-turbulent boundary layer control methods. Mass-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with the RNG k-ε turbulence model are solved using a fully implicit finite volume scheme and time-marching algorithm. The shock position and extent of separation was found to be dependent on the freestream Mach number and plume pressure ratio. Rounding the tail or a groove on the surface near the tail moved the shockwave downstream of the tail fin which should enhance the control of the missile.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 108 , Issue 1082 , April 2004 , pp. 185 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Albini, F.A. Approximate computation of under-expanded jet structure, AIAA J, 1965, 3, (8), pp 1538.Google Scholar
2. Boynton, F.P. Highly under-expanded jet Structure: exact and approximate calculations, AIAA J, 1967, 5, (9), pp 1703–1704.Google Scholar
3. Adamson, T.C. and Nicholls, J.A. On the structure of jets from highly underexpanded nozzles into still air, J Aeronaut Sciences, 1959, 26, pp 16–24.Google Scholar
4. Alpinieri, L.J. and Adams, R.H. Flow separation due to jet pluming, AIAA J, 1966, 4, (10), pp 1865–1866.Google Scholar
5. Fetterman, D.E. Effects of simulated rocket-jet exhaust on stability and control of a research-type airplane configuration at a Mach number of 6·86, 1959, NASA TM X-127.Google Scholar
6. Yanowitch, S. and Hneuber, R.N. Scout first stage flight characteristics, 1968, NASA CR-11 1945.Google Scholar
7. Raghunathan, S., Kim, H.D., Benard, E., Mallon, P. and Harrison, R. Plume interference effects on missile bodies, Jan 2001, 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno NV, AIAA-2001-0259.Google Scholar
8. Salmi, R.J. Effects of jet billowing on stability of missile-type bodies at Mach 3·85, June 1960, NASA TN D-284.Google Scholar
9. Hinson, W.F. and Mcghee, R.J. Effects of jet pluming on the static stability of five rocket models at Mach number of 4, 5 and 6 and Static-Pressure Ratios up to 26,000, 1967, NASA TN D-4064.Google Scholar
10. Hinson, W.F. and Falanga, R.A. Effects of jet pluming on the static stability of cone-cylinder-flare configurations at Mach number of 9·64, 1969, NASA TN D-1352.Google Scholar
11. Mcghee, R.J. Some effects of jet pluming on the static stability of ballistics bodies at a Mach number of 6·00, 1966, NASA, TN D-3698.Google Scholar
12. Mcghee, R.J. and Martin, J.A. Exploratory investigation of flow field resulting from forward-facing nozzles exhausting near a large cylindrical body at free-stream Mach numbers of 3·0 to 6·0, 1969, NASA TN D-5030.Google Scholar
13. Mcghee, R.J. Jet-plume-induced flow separation on axisymmetric bodies at Mach numbers of 3·00, 4·50 and 6·00, 1970, NASA TM X-2059.Google Scholar
14. Wu, J.M. and Aoyama, K. Pressure distributions for axisymmetric bodies with discontinuous curvature in transonic flow, 1970, US Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, Technical Report RD-TR-70-25.Google Scholar
15. Wu, J.M., Aoyama, K. and Moulden, T.H. Transonic flow field calculation around ogive cylinders by non-linear-linear stretching method, 1970, US Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, Technical Report, RD-TR-70-12.Google Scholar
16. Wu, J.M., Aoyama, K. and Moulden, T.H. Transonic flow fields around various bodies of revolution including preliminary studies on viscous effects with and without plume-summary report, 1971, US Army Missile Command Report, RD-TR-71-12.Google Scholar
17. Matesanz, A., Velazquez, A., Perales, J.M. and Santiago-Prowald, J. Numerical simulation of base-flow/plume interaction, 1998, AIAA Paper 98–1597.Google Scholar
18. Bannink, W.J., Houtman, E.M. and Bakker, P.G. Base flow/underexpanded exhaust plume interaction in a supersonic external flow, 1998, AIAA Paper 98–1598.Google Scholar
19. Venkateswaran, S., Weiss, J.M. and Merkle, C.L. Propulsion related flowfields using the preconditioned Navier-Stokes equations, 1992, AIAA Paper 92–3437.Google Scholar
20. Barth, T.J. and Jespersen, D. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes, 1989, AIAA Technical Report 89-0366, AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada.Google Scholar
21. Jameson, A., Schmidt, W. and Turkel, E. Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes, 1981, AIAA Paper 81–1259.Google Scholar
22. Burt, J.R. An experimental investigation of the effect of several rocket plume simulators on the pressure distribution of a body of revolution at free stream Mach number of 0·9 to 1·2, 1970, US Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, Technical Report RD-TR-70-23.Google Scholar