Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:48:17.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Considerations for UAV design and operation in South African airspace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

L. A. Ingham ,
T. Jones  and
A. Maneschijn
L. A. Ingham
Affiliation:
Stellenbosch University, South Africa
T. Jones
Affiliation:
Stellenbosch University, South Africa
A. Maneschijn
Affiliation:
Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At present, the lack of UAV regulations and standards precludes UAVs from being certified to operate commercially in un-segregated civilian airspace. Because of strategic, economical and security requirements, it is necessary to devise a method to operate UAVs in South African airspace within existing regulatory arrangements. This paper suggests specific UAV missions, viz; maritime patrol/boarder control, search and rescue, and cargo transport, together with design considerations and possible concepts of UAV; operations, maintenance and training, that will enable UAVs to satisfy the immediate South African strategic requirements whilst further UAV standards and regulations are being developed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 110 , Issue 1112 , October 2006 , pp. 695 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. A Concept for European Regulations for Civil Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, 2004, UAV Task Force Final Report.Google Scholar
2. Ingham, L.A., Jones, T. and Maneschijn, A., Certification of unmanned aerial vehicles in South African airspace, R&D J, 2006, SAIME.Google Scholar
3. Aeronautics and Space, Federal Aviation Regulations Title 14, US Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
4. RTCA DO-178B, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, 1992.Google Scholar
5. Maneschijn, A., Developing a Feasible Engineering Policy to Ensure Continued Aviation Safety in the South African Air Force, 2002, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
6. Fabrycky, W.J. and Mize, J.H., Systems Engineering and Analysis, 1998, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
7. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030, 2005, United States Office of the Secretary of Defense.Google Scholar
8. De Garmo, M.T., Issues Concerning Integration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Civil Airspace, 2004, MITRE.Google Scholar
9. NASA ERAST Alliance Certification Project, Concept of Operations in the National Airspace System, Version 1.2.Google Scholar
10. Weibel, R.E. and Hansman, R., Safety Considerations for Operation of Different Classes of UAVs in the NAS, 2004, AIAA.Google Scholar
11. Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, 2003, Part 101, First edition, Australia.Google Scholar
12. UAV Roadmap, 2001, Office of the Secretary of Defense.Google Scholar
13. Siko, L., South Africa’s Maritime Interest and Responsibilities, African Security Review, 1996, 5, (2), Pretoria.Google Scholar
14. CAP 722, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operations in the UK Airspace — Guidance, 2004.Google Scholar
15. Wheatley, S., The Time is Right: Developing a UAV Policy for the Canadian Armed Forces, 2004, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
16. Williams, W. and Harris, M., Determination of the operational effectiveness of UAVs for mining exploration, UAV Asia-Pacific, 2003.Google Scholar
17. Airspace Integration Plan for Unmanned Aviation, 2004, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
18. McCarley, J.S. and Wickens, C.D., Human Factors of UAVs in the National Airspace, Aviation Human Factors Division.Google Scholar
19. Mouloua, M., Gilson, R. and Hancock, P., Human Centred Design of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Ergonomics and Design, 2003.Google Scholar
20. Weeks, J.L., Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operator Qualifications, 2000, Air Force Research Laboratory, Mesa, AZ.Google Scholar
21. Giadrosich, D.L., Operations Research Analysis in Test and Evaluation, 1998, AIAA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar