Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:36:04.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computer Graphical Design Aids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

W. H. P. Leslie
W. H. P. Leslie*
Affiliation:
Numerical Control Division, Machinery Group, National Engineering Laboratory, East Kilbride
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The engineering designer may not always be aware of the paramount importance of being able to sketch his ideas as a means of communicating his plans.

An example illustrates the point that drawings, graphs or diagrams convey concepts more easily than a table of figures. Table I gives a series of X and Y values describing a well-known contour, but it is not easy to determine the shape except by plotting the points. One can appreciate at a glance at Fig. 1, however, that it is a well-known shape.

Although the drawing is very graphic, the term graphic will also be taken to include alphabetical and numerical records for the purpose of this paper.

Type
Symposium on the Impact of Digital Computers on Engineering
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 71 , Issue 676 , April 1967 , pp. 237 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mackay, D. M.A Simple Multi-dimensional CRT Display Unit. Electronic Engineering, June, pp 344–347, 1960.Google Scholar
2.Osman, W. G. and Herbert, E. Air Traffic Control. International Sci and Technology, September 1963.Google Scholar
3.Davis, M. R. and Ellis, T. O.The Rand Tablet. Fall Joint Computer Conference, AFIPS Proceedings, p 325, 1964.Google Scholar
4.Woo, P. W.A Proposal for the Input of Hand Drawn Information to Digital Systems. IEEE Trans on Electronic Computers, October, pp 609–611, 1964. Google Scholar
5.Richards, E. A. Perspective Drawing. English Electric Co Ltd, Report W/M(4C), March, p 86, 1961.Google Scholar
6.Elliott, W. J. and Hood, R. C.On the Structure of Higher Level Languages for Automatic Drafting. Allison Res and Engg, 2nd Quarter, 9–29, 1965.Google Scholar
7.Larkin, M.Computer Programs for the Numerical Study and Graphical Display of Magnetic Fields. UKAEE Research Group Report CLM-R31, Culham, 1964.Google Scholar
8.Johnson, C. K.Stereographic Drawings of Chemical Diagrams. Joint Meeting of the American Crystallographic Assoc and Mineralogical Soc of America, 27th June to 2nd July, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, 1965.Google Scholar
9.Gellert, G. O.Geometric Computing. Boeing Document D2-22926. Seattle: Boeing Airplane Division, 1964. Google Scholar
10. Proceedings of UAIDE Conference, New York, Stromberg Carlson Corporation, San Diego, 1965.Google Scholar
11.“Movie Language” Developed for Making Animated Films by Computer. Computers and Automation, July p 47, 1964.Google Scholar
12.Anon. A Block Diagramming Compiler. BSTJ, March pp 345–358, 1966.Google Scholar
13.Branin, F. H. Jr., D-C and Transient Analysis of Networks Using a Digital Computer. Proc SHARE Design Automotion Workshop, Atlantic City, N.J., 1964.Google Scholar
14. Finger-tip Control of a Computer. New Scientist, 11th November 1965.Google Scholar