Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:58:55.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competitive restraints on air travel: ground modes and telecommunications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. S. Shevell Professor
R. S. Shevell Professor*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Future air transportation growth will be limited not only by the availability of personal disposable income for travel and by the maximum reasonable needs of business travellers, but also by competition from other modes such as the automobile, train, exotic guided ground transportation systems, such as magnetically levitated vehicles, buses and ships. Because of the aircraft's overwhelmingly superior speed and cost characteristics with respect to passenger ships, the passenger ship has been largely reduced to a recreational facility rather than a transportation mode. There are, of course, a few exceptions for short voyages between origins and destinations separated by water. But it is sufficiently clear that water transportation will not compete economically with air, except at very short ranges in a few unique situations, so that this mode will not be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 82 , Issue 806 , February 1978 , pp. 75 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shevell, R. S. Selection of the fittest: the evolution and future of transport aircraft. Israel Journal of Technology, Vol 12, p 1, August 1974.Google Scholar
2. Shevell, R. S. Technology, efficiency and future transport aircraft. Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol 13, No 9, p 36, September 1975.Google Scholar
3. Shevell, R. S. et al. Technological characteristics of future intercity transportation modes. Vol 3 of Technology Assignment of Future Intercity Passenger Transportation Systems, prepared for NASA and US DOT by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Burlingame, Calif., March 1976.Google Scholar
4. Kollen, J. H. and Garwood, J. The replacement of travel by telecommunications. Paper No 29, Bell Canada, Montreal, October 1974.Google Scholar
5. Van vleck, E. M. Substituting telecommunications for travel: feasible or desirable. NASA Ames Research Center, Proceedings of IEEE Telecommunications Conference, San Diego, Calif., December 1974.Google Scholar
6. Harkness, R. C. Selected results from a technology assessment of telecommunications—transportation interactions. Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, Calif. Proceedings of IEEE Telecommunications Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1976.Google Scholar
7. Jones, D. W. The transportation/communication tradeoff. Chapter 15 of Vol 2 of Iechnology Assessment of Future Intercity Passenger Transportation Systems, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Burlingame, Calif., March 1976.Google Scholar