Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:47:05.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cessna Citation X simulation turbofan modelling: identification and identified model validation using simulated flight tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2019

Ruxandra Mihaela Botez ,
Paul-Alexandre Bardela  and
Thomas Bournisien
Ruxandra Mihaela Botez*
Affiliation:
ÉTS, Systems Department, Laboratory of Applied Research in Active Controls, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Montreal, Québec, Canada
Paul-Alexandre Bardela
Affiliation:
ÉTS, Systems Department, Laboratory of Applied Research in Active Controls, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Montreal, Québec, Canada
Thomas Bournisien
Affiliation:
ÉTS, Systems Department, Laboratory of Applied Research in Active Controls, Avionics and AeroServoElasticity (LARCASE), Montreal, Québec, Canada
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aviation industry relies on accurate models. These models are used to predict an aircraft system’s outputs, and thus allow an understanding of the parameters involved, which could lead to system improvements. This study focuses on the engine modelling of an aircraft, and on its experimental validation using the Cessna Citation X Research Aircraft Simulator designed by CAE Inc., equipped with a level D Flight Dynamics toolbox. Level D is the highest rank attributed by the Federal Aviation Administration FAA certification authorities for flight dynamics. The proposed model aims to predict the thrust and the fuel consumption for various altitudes, Mach numbers and throttle lever angles (TLA). Different generic static models, which correspond to their steady state, from the literature, were used in this study; however, most of them were validated under restricted hypotheses. An optimisation algorithm was used in order to tune the static model parameters with the set of identification flight test data. Another set of data was then used in order to validate the identified model. Furthermore, a dynamic model corresponding to the transient operations was identified. TLA steps, impulses and ramp perturbations were performed in order to identify the system response, and to validate system dynamic model with other flight tests than the identification tests.

Keywords

TurbofanCessna Citation X Business AircraftFlight testsModel identification and validationResearch Aircraft Flight Simulator
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 123 , Issue 1262 , April 2019 , pp. 433 - 463
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Raymer, D.P. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 1999, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
2. Murrieta Mendoza, A., Demange, S., George, F. and Botez, R. Performance Database Creation using a Flight D Simulator For Cessna Citation X Aircraft in Cruise Regime, The 34th IASTED International Conference on Modelling, Identification, and Control (MIC2015), 2015.Google Scholar
3. Murrieta-Mendoza, A., Demange, S., George, F. and Botez, R. Performance DataBase creation using a level D simulator for Cessna Citation X aircraft in cruise regime, IASTED Modeling, Identification and Control Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, 2015.Google Scholar
4. Patrón, R.S.F., Berrou, Y. and Botez, R.M. New methods of optimization of the flight profiles for performance database-modeled aircraft, Proceedings of the Institution of Mech Engineers, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, 2015, 229, (10), pp 1853–1867.Google Scholar
5. Murrieta-Mendoza, A. and Botez, R. Method to Calculate Aircraft VNAV Trajectory Cost Using a Performance Database, ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014, pp V001T01A053–V001T01A053.Google Scholar
6. Murrieta-Mendoza, A. and Botez, R.M. Methodology for vertical-navigation flight-trajectory cost calculation using a performance database, J Aerospace Information Systems, 2015, 12, (8), pp 519–532.Google Scholar
7. Beulze, B., Dancila, B., Botez, R., Bottollier-Lemallaz, S. and Herda, S. Presentation of three methods results comparison for vertical navigation VNAV trajectory optimization for the flight management system FMS, 15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 2015, p 2597.Google Scholar
8. Dancila, B.D. and Botez, R.M. Construction of an aircraft’s VNAV flight envelope for in-FMS flight trajectory computation and optimization, 14th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 2014, p 2291.Google Scholar
9. Gautier, M.M., Dancila, R. and Botez, R.M. Optimization of the Cruise Regime of flight airplane trajectory using deterministic algorithms, 15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 2015, p 3179.Google Scholar
10. Liv, A., Dancila, R.I. and Botez, R.M. Trajectory optimization algorithm for a constant altitude Cruise flight with a required time of arrival constraints, 15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 2015, p 2282.Google Scholar
11. Mendoza, A.M., Beuze, B., Ternisien, L. and Botez, R. Branch & bound based algorithm for aircraft VNAV profile reference trajectory optimization, 2015. 15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, Dallas, TX, US, Paper AIAA 2015-2280, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-2280 Google Scholar
12. Mendoza, A.M. and Botez, R. Vertical navigation trajectory optimization algorithm for a commercial aircraft, AIAA/3AF Aircraft Noise and Emissions Reduction Symposium, 2014.Google Scholar
13. Murrieta-Mendoza, A., Botez, R. and Labour, D. Vertical navigation trajectory optimization algorithm for the Lockheed l-1011. AIAA aircraft noise and emissions reduction symposium, Atlanta, GA; 2014.Google Scholar
14. Patrón, R.S.F., Berrou, Y. and Botez, R.M. Climb, cruise and descent 3D trajectory optimization algorithm for a flight management system, AIAA/3AF Aircraft Noise and Emissions Reduction Symposium, AIAA AVIATION Forum, Atlanta, GA, USA, Paper AIAA 2014-3018, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2014-3018 Google Scholar
15. Patrón, R.S.F. and Botez, R.M. Flight trajectory optimization through genetic algorithms coupling vertical and lateral profiles, ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014, pp V001T01A048–V001T01A048.Google Scholar
16. Sidibé, S. and Botez, R. Trajectory optimization of FMS-CMA 9000 by dynamic programming, ASI AÉRO 2013 Conference, 60th Aeronautics Conference and AGM, Toronto, Canada, 2013.Google Scholar
17. Suraweera, J.K. Off-Design Performance Prediction of Gas Turbines without the Use of Compressor or Turbine Characteristics, Carleton University Ottawa, 2011, Ottawa.Google Scholar
18. Roberts, R.A. and Eastbourn, S.M. Modeling techniques for a computational efficient dynamic turbofan engine model, Int J Aerospace Engineering, 2014, 2014, pp 1–11.Google Scholar
19. Bazazzade, M., Shahriari, A. and Badihi, H. Improved turbine engine hierarchical modeling and simulation based on engine fuel control system, 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, USA, Paper AIAA-2009-5525, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-5525.Google Scholar
20. Szuch, J.R., Krosel, S.M. and Bruton, W.M. An automated procedure for developing hybrid computer simulations of turbofan engines, Proceedings of the 14th Annual Symposium on Simulation, IEEE Press, 1981, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 79–94.Google Scholar
21. Cai, N., Li, H.W., Li, M. and Ye, B. Modeling and simulation of turbofan engine based on modularized subassembly, Applied Mechanics and Materials. Transactions of Technical Publications, 2014, 599, pp 353–357.Google Scholar
22. Yao, H.T., Wang, X. and Kong, X.X. A real-time transient model of CF6 turbofan engine, Applied Mechanics and Materials. Transactions of Technical Publications, 2013, 241, pp 1573–1585.Google Scholar
23. Martin, S., Wallace, I. and Bates, D.G. Development and validation of a civil aircraft engine simulation model for advanced controller design, J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2008, 130, (5), p 051601.Google Scholar
24. Ogaji, S., Sampath, S., Singh, R. and Probert, S. Parameter selection for diagnosing a gas-turbine’s performance-deterioration, Applied Energy, 2002, 73, (1), pp 25–46.Google Scholar
25. Baig, M.F. and Sayeed, N. Model-based reasoning for fault diagnosis of twin-spool turbofans, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, 1998, 212, (2), pp 109–116.Google Scholar
26. Saravanamuttoo, H.I.H., Rogers, G.F.C. and Cohen, H. Gas Turbine Theory. Pearson Education, Edinbourgh, England; 2001.Google Scholar
27. Urban, L.A. Gas path analysis applied to turbine engine condition monitoring, J Aircr, 1973, 10, (7), pp 400–406.Google Scholar
28. Sugiyama, N. Derivation of system matrices from nonlinear dynamic simulation of jet engines, J Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1994, 17, (6), pp 1320–1326.Google Scholar
29. Sugiyama, N. On line system identification of jet engine, 32nd AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Lake Buena Vista, FL, 1996.Google Scholar
30. Sugiyama, N. System identification of jet engines, ASME 1998 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1998, pp V005T15A007–V005T15A007.Google Scholar
31. Luppold, R., Roman, J., Gallops, G. and Kerr, L. Estimating in-flight engine performance variations using Kalman filter concepts, AIAA, ASME, SAE, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference, 25th, Monterey, CA, 1989, p 1989.Google Scholar
32. Kobayashi, T., Simon, D.L. and Litt, J.S. Application of a constant gain extended Kalman filter for in-flight estimation of aircraft engine performance parameters, ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2005, pp 617–628.Google Scholar
33. Kobayashi, T. and Simon, D.L. Hybrid neural-network genetic-algorithm technique for aircraft engine performance diagnostics, J Propulsion and Power, 2005, 21, (4), pp 751–758.Google Scholar
34. Tayarani-Bathaie, S.S., Vanini, Z.S. and Khorasani, K. Dynamic neural network-based fault diagnosis of gas turbine engines, Neurocomputing, 2014, 125, pp 153–165.Google Scholar
35. Mathioudakis, K. and Romessis, C. Probabilistic neural networks for validation of on-board jet engine data, Proceedings of the Institution of Mech Engineers, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, 2004, 218, (1), pp 59–72.Google Scholar
36. CD-adapco, U. GUIDE: STAR-CCM+.” Version, 2009.Google Scholar
37. Fluent, I. FLUENT 6.3 User’s Guide, Fluent documentation, 2006.Google Scholar
38. Adamczyk, J.J. Aerodynamic analysis of multistage turbomachinery flows in support of aerodynamic design, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. ASME 1999 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, 1999, pp V004T06A001–V004T06A001.Google Scholar
39. Beaulieu, M., De Jesus Mota, S. and Botez, R. Identification of structural surfaces’ positions on an F/A-18 using the subspace identification method from flight flutter tests, Proceedings of the Institution of Mech Engineers, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, 2007, 221, (5), pp 719–731.Google Scholar
40. Boëly, N. and Botez, R.M. New approach for the identification and validation of a nonlinear F/A-18 model by use of neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2010, 21, (11), pp 1759–1765.Google Scholar
41. Boëly, N., Botez, R.M. and Kouba, G. Identification of a non-linear F/A-18 model by the use of fuzzy logic and neural network methods, Proceedings of the Institution of Mech Engineers, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 225, (5), pp 559–574.Google Scholar
42. De Jesus-Mota, S., Nadeau Beaulieu, M. and Botez, R. Identification of a MIMO state space model of an F/A-1 aircraft using a subspace method,”, Aeronautical J, 2009, 113, (1141), p 183.Google Scholar
43. Ghazi, G., Botez, R. and Achigui, J.M. Cessna Citation X engine model identification from flight tests, SAE Int J Aerospace, 2015, 8, (2015-01-2390), pp 203–213.Google Scholar
44. Hamel, C., Sassi, A., Botez, R. and Dartigues, C. Cessna Citation X aircraft global model identification from flight tests, SAE Int J Aerospace, 2013, 6, (2013-01-2094), pp 106–114.Google Scholar
45. Kouba, G., Botez, R.M. and Boely, N. Fuzzy logic method use in F/A-18 aircraft model identification, J Aircr, 2010, 47, (1), pp 10–17.Google Scholar
46. De Jesus Mota, S. and Botez, R. New helicopter model identification method based on flight test data, Aeronautical J, 2011, 115, (1167), p 295.Google Scholar
47. Nadeau Beaulieu, M. and Botez, R. Simulation and prediction of the helicopter main rotor, tail rotor and engine parameters by using the subspace system identification method, J Aerospace Engineering, 2008, 222, (6), pp 817–834.Google Scholar
48. Bardela, P.A. and Botez, R.M. Cessna Citation X Static Engine Model Identification, CASI Conference, Toronto, 2017.Google Scholar
49. Jategaonkar, R. Flight Vehicle System Identification: A Time Domain Methodology: AIAA, 2006, Reston, VA, US.Google Scholar
50. Klein, V. and Morelli, E.A. Aircraft System Identification: Theory and Practice: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006, Reston, VA, US.Google Scholar
51. Mattingly, J., Heiser, W. and Pratt, D. Aircraft engine design, AIAA Education Series, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Vol. 9, 2002, Reston, VA, pp 358–378.Google Scholar
52. Torenbeek, E. Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design: an Introduction to the Preliminary Design of Subsonic general Aviation and Transport Aircraft, with Emphasis on Layout, Aerodynamic Design, Propulsion and Performance, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.Google Scholar
53. Roux, E. Pour une Approche Analytique de la Dynamique du Vol, thesis, SUPAERO-ONERA, 2005.Google Scholar
54. Wanner, J.-C. Dynamique du Vol et Pilotage des Avions. Office National d'Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales ONERA, 1976.Google Scholar
55. Rodriguez, L.F. and Botez, R.M. Civil turbofan engines thrust generic model, IECON 2012-38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IEEE, 2012, pp 5444–5450.Google Scholar
56. Bardela, P.A. and Botez, R.M. Identification and validation of the Cessna Citation X engine component level modeling with flight tests, AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, 2017, p 1942.Google Scholar
57. Nuic, A. User manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) revision 3.10, Atmosphere, 2010, 2010, p 001.Google Scholar
58. Yoder, T.T.A. Development of Aircraft Fuel Burn Modeling Techniques with Applications to Global Emissions Modeling and Assessment of the Benefits of Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 2007, Cambridge, MA, US.Google Scholar
59. Hill, P.G. and Peterson, C.R. Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Propulsion, Vol. 1, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1992, Reading, MA, US, 764 p.Google Scholar
60. Eberhart, R. and Kennedy, J. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, MHS'95, IEEE Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science MHS'95, 1995, pp 39–43.Google Scholar
61. Marquardt, D.W. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, J Soc Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1963, 11, (2), pp 431–441.Google Scholar
62. Flint, T.W. and Vaccaro, R.J. Performance analysis of N4SID state-space system identification, IEEE Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference, Vol. 5, 1998, pp 2766–2767.Google Scholar
63. Bardela, P.A., Botez, R.M. and Pageaud, P. Cessna Citation X Engine Model Experimental Validation, IASTED, February 2017, Innsbruck, Austria.Google Scholar