Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:48:38.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Automatic regime detection for Rotor Track and Balance using vibration only sensor data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2020

M. Asher ,
D. Toshkova  and
N. Lieven Open the ORCID record for N. Lieven [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rotor Track and Balance (RTB) is an important part of regular helicopter maintenance. The ability to perform this service assessment during normal operations, rather than with a series of explicit RTB flights, would greatly reduce the time the vehicle is non-operational and the maintenance costs associated with these flights and adjustments. This paper presents a novel methodology for identifying the RTB-related flight regimes, using a minimal number of vibration signals and comparing these to repeatable and stable characteristic vibration profiles. The technique is stable, with an 81% success in correct identification of the flight regime, when applied to a whole flight with a number of unknown regime events. The method can be run in real time, making it an effective way of identifying periods of flight that are suitable for RTB measurements. A new technique for visually representing any real-time flight signal, such as vibration, is also presented.

Keywords

RotorcraftRegime RecognitionVisualisations
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 124 , Issue 1275 , May 2020 , pp. 617 - 634
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Moon, S. and Phan, N.Rotary wing aircraft maneuver recognition algorithm development and validation approach. Annual Forum Proceedings-American Helicopter Society, 2008, 64, (2), American Helicopter Society, Inc., pp 1436–1459Google Scholar
Renzi, M.J. An assessment of modern methods for rotor track and balance, (No. AFIT/GAE/ENY/04-J11). Air Force Inst Of Tech Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, Dept Of Aeronautics And Astronautics, 2004.Google Scholar
Oldersma, A. and Bos, M.J. Airframe loads and usage monitoring of the ch-47d “chinook” helicopter of the Royal Netherlands Air Force, ICAF 2011 Structural Integrity: Influence of Efficiency and Green Imperatives, 2011, pp 473–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teal, R., Evernham, J., Larchuk, T., Miller, D., Marquith, D., White, F. and Deibler, D.Regime recognition for MH-47E structural usage monitoring. Annual Forum Proceedings-American Helicopter Society, 1997, 53, pp 1267–1284. American Helicopter Society.Google Scholar
Barndt, G., Sarkar, S. and Miller, C. May. Maneuver regime recognition development and verification for h-60 structural monitoring. Annual Forum Proceedings-American Helicopter Society, 2007, 63, (1), p 317. American Helicopter Society, Inc.Google Scholar
Grabill, P., Brotherton, T. and Keller, J.A., March. Helicopter structural life modeling: flight regime and gross weight estimation, Aerospace Conference, 2007 IEEE (pp 1–9). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, D., Wu, S. and Bechhoefer, E. Development of regime recognition tools for usage monitoring, Aerospace Conference, 2007 IEEE (pp 1–11). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajnicek, R.E. Application of kalman filtering to real-time flight regime recognition algorithms in a helicopter health and usage monitoring system. Theses - Daytona Beach. 169. 2008. http://commons.erau.edu/db-theses/169Google Scholar
Wyłomańska, A. and Zimroz, R. Signal segmentation for operational regimes detection of heavy duty mining mobile machines-a statistical approach. Diagnostyka, 15, 2014.Google Scholar
Celis, C., Xavier, É., Teixeira, T. and Pinto, G.R.Steady state detection in industrial gas turbines for condition monitoring and diagnostics applications. In ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition (pp V006T06A001–V006T06A001). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2014, June.Google Scholar
Laillet, E. Condition (usage) based maintenance & SLL computation using flight regime recognition algorithm, 1–13. 73rd American Helicopter Society Forum, May 9-11, 2017, Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
Bishop, C.M.Neural Networks for Patten Recognition, Oxford University Press, 1995, Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
Yang, W. and Zurbenko, I.Kolmogorov–Zurbenko filters. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2010, 2, (3), pp 340–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurbenko, I.G.The Spectral Analysis of Time Series, Elsevier North-Holland, Inc., 1986, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Bechhoefer, E. and Kingsley, M. A review of time synchronous average algorithms, Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, San Diego, CA, Sept 2009, pp 24–33.Google Scholar
Turin, G.An introduction to matched filters, IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 1960, 6, (3), pp 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MØller, M.F.A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks, 1993, 6, (4), pp 525–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar