Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:16:41.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of certain merits of FSW and effect of the sign of the sweep angle on the stressing of a wing structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. Souahi*
Affiliation:
Department of Aircraft Design, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Bedford

Extract

Forward Swept Wings have a number of advantages over Aft Swept Wings which have been appreciated for a number of years. In the past, however, their use has been restricted to limited degrees of sweep because of the severe weight penalty necessary to prevent aerolastic divergence. Recently, it has been shown that the outstanding directional properties of fibrous composites could help overcome this problem by adequate selection of ply orientations and laminate thickness distribution of the wing skin.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. ProfHowe, D. A comparison between Forward and Aft Swept on V/STOL combat aircraft. College of Aeronautics, Cranfield Institute of Technology UK.Google Scholar
2. Stanniland, D. R. Aspects of the aerodynamic design of a thin supercritical, Forward Swept Wing for a combat aircraft. Aircraft Research Associated Ltd, Bradford, UK.Google Scholar
3. Qui, Cheng-Hao, DrPoll, I. A. A comparison of the aero dynamic characteristics of Swept Forward and Swept Back Wings including the effects of strakes. College of Aeronautics, Cranfield Institute of Technology, UK.Google Scholar
4. Weeks, T. M., Leet, L. H. The X-29A Forward Swept Wing advanced technology demonstrator program. Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, USA.Google Scholar
5. DrFielding, J. P. A supersonic V/STOL fighter design project. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, August/September 1982, 857, 86, 252258.Google Scholar
6. DrFielding, J. P. Naval V/STOL fighter S80. Cranfield Institute of Technology, College of Aeronautics. DES 8000 January 1981.Google Scholar