Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:25:46.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of GO methodology in reliability analysis of aircraft flap hydraulic system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2019

J. Ma*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116023, China
F. Duan
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116023, China

Abstract

The Goal-Oriented methodology (GO methodology) is an effective method for the reliability analysis of complex systems. It is especially suitable for the reliability analysis of multi-state complex systems containing the actual logistics, such as current, airflow and liquid flow. In order to solve the limitation that the GO methodology is not suitable for the reliability analysis of the system with feedback loop, the Boolean algebra idea is introduced to construct the Boolean operation formula of the feedback loop. In this paper, a certain type of civil aircraft flap hydraulic system with feedback loop is taken as the research object. According to the structural schematic diagram of the flap hydraulic system, the GO model of the flap hydraulic system is established. Next, the GO calculation is carried out to obtain the reliability of the flap hydraulic system. The comparison between the system reliability without feedback loop and that with feedback loop proves that the GO methodology with feedback loop is more accurate. The reliability of the system is analyzed by using the fault tree analysis (FTA) method, and the GO methodology with feedback loop is compared with the FTA method to verify the availability and correctness of the GO methodology in the reliability analysis and safety evaluation of aircraft flap hydraulic system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Xu, Y.M. Research on Health monitoring and Maintenance Strategy for Civil Airplane Flap Mechanism. Ph.D. thesis, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.Google Scholar
Cui, J.G., Lin, Z.L., Chen, X.C., Lv, R., Qi, Y.W. andJiang, L.W. Research on health assessment of the aircraft hydraulic system, Control Eng China, 2014, 21, (03), pp 446449. doi: 10.14107/j.cnki.kzgc.2014.03.006.Google Scholar
Wan, K., Zhao, T.F., Zhu, Y., Yang, S.B., Wang, J.H. andOuYang, X. P. Reliability analysis on the hydraulic power system of the civil aircraft, Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2015, (08), pp 2025. doi: 10.11832/j.issn.1000-4858.2015.08.004.Google Scholar
Wang, J.H. Reliability Analysis on the Commercial Aircraft Hydraulic System. Master Degree thesis, Zhejiang University, 2015.Google Scholar
Mihalčová, J. andAmeringai, P. Ensuring the reliability of an aircraft engine hydraulic system, Appl Mech Mater, 2014, 616, pp 126134. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.616.126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schallert, C. Integrated Safety and Reliability Analysis Methods for Aircraft System Development using Multi-Domain Object-oriented Models. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, 2016.Google Scholar
Shen, Z.P. andHuang, X.R. Principle and Application of GO Methodology, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, 2004.Google Scholar
Liu, L.L., Fan, D.M., Wang, Z.L., Yang, D.Z., Cui, J.J., Ma, X.R. andRen, Y. Enhanced GO methodology to support failure mode, effects and criticality analysis, J Intell Manuf, 2019, 30, (03), pp 14511468. doi: 10.1007/s10845-017-1336-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Z.P, Gao, J andHuang, X.R. An exact algorithm dealing with shared signals in the GO methodology, Reliab Eng Syst Safety, 2001, 73, (2001), pp 177181. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00035-7.Google Scholar
Du, Y.B., Li, C.B. andLiu, S.H. Reliability assessment method of remanufacturing process for machine tools based on GO method, J Mech Eng, 2017, 53, (11), pp 203210. doi: 10.3901/JME.2017.11.203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J. Design for Safety, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Hoboken, US, 2017.Google Scholar
Sheng, Z.P., Dai, X.J. andHuang, X.R. A supplemental algorithm for the repairable system in the GO methodology, Reliab Eng Syst Safety, 2005, 91, (2006), pp 940944. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, X.H. andDuan, F.H. An new quantification algorithm with probability matrix in the GO methodology, Journal of Information & Computational Science, 2014, 11, (14), pp 50355042. doi: 10.12733/jics20104598.Google Scholar
Yi, X.J., Dhillon, B.S., Dong, H.P., Shi, J. andJiang, J.P. Quantitative reliability analysis of repairable systems with closed-loop feedback based on GO methodology, J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 2016, 39, (5), pp 18451858. doi: 10.1007/s40430-016-0665-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, X.J., Dhillon, B.S., Shi, J., Mu, H.N., andZhang, Z. A new reliability analysis method for vehicle systems based on goal-oriented methodology, Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Aut Eng, 2017, 231, (8), pp 10661095. doi: 10.1177/0954407016671276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, X.J., Shi, J., Mu, H.N., Zhang, Y., Guo, S.W.and Liang, Q.H. Reliability analysis on repairable system with dual input closed-loop link considering shutdown correlation based on goal oriented methodology, J Donghua Univ (English ed.), 2016, 33, (2), pp 314318.Google Scholar
Wang, X.P., Mileta, T. andLiu, H. Commericial Aircraft Hydraulic Systems, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai, China, 2015.Google Scholar
OuYang, X.P., Yang, H.Y., Guo, S.R. andYang, S.B. Modern Hydraulics for Aircrafts, Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou, China, 2016.Google Scholar
Lan, X., Duan, F.H., andSang, Y. Application of GO-FLOW methodology in reliability analysis of aircraft EHA, J Beijing Univ Aeronautics Astronautics, 2017, 43, (6), pp 12641270. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0444.Google Scholar
Elsayed, A. Reliability Engineering, Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing, China, 2013.Google Scholar
Lu, Q., Yuan, W.B. andXiang, X.D. A new approach to the study of system failure probability distribution based on the minimum path set, J Saf Environ, 2011, 11, (06), pp 227230. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2011.06.053.Google Scholar