Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T15:15:04.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of anisotropic prismatic sectiosn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

G. F. J. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
P. M. Weaver
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Abstract

The dynamic behaviour of rotor blades is often modelled using onedimensional beam analysis with equivalent mass and stiffness properties to those of the full blade. Calculation of accurate elastic stiffness terms for these arbitrarily shaped sections with differing material properties is vital to this process. A method which produces these properties using standard finite element analysis codes is presented. The method is then compared with theoretical results for a simple rectangular section beam and case studies are performed on a composite laminate and box-section.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mansfield, E.H. and Sobey, A.J. The fibre composite helicopter blade, Aeronaut Q, May 1979, pp 413417.Google Scholar
2. Young, W.C. Roark’s Formulas for Stress Strain, 1989, 6, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
3. Mansfield, E.H. The stiffness of a two-cell anisotropic tube, Aeronaut Q, 1981, pp 338353.Google Scholar
4. Bartholomew, P. and Mercer, A.D. Analysis of an anisotropic beam with arbitrary cross-section, RAE TR-84058, 1984, Farnborough, UK.Google Scholar
5.rndle, R. Calculation of the cross-section properties and the shear stress of composite rotor blades, Vertica, 1982, 6, pp 111129.Google Scholar
6. Giavotto, V., Borri, M, Mantegazza, P. and Ghiringelli, G. Anisotropic beam theory and applications, Computers and Structures, 1983, 16, (1-4), pp 403413.Google Scholar
7. Kosmatka, J.B. and Friedmann, P.P. Vibration analysis of composite turbopropellers using a nonlinear beam-type finite element approach, AIAA J, 1989, 27, (11).Google Scholar
8. Kosmatka, J.B. and Dong, S.B. Saint-Venant solutions for prismatic anisotropic beams, Int J Solids Structures, 1991, 28, (7), pp 917938.Google Scholar
9. Kosmatka, J.B. General behaviour and shear centre location of prismatic anisotropic beams via power series, Int J Solids Structures, 1994, 31, (3), pp 417439.Google Scholar
10. Kosmatka, J.B. and Dong, S.B. General behaviour and shear centre location of advanced composite beams via power series, Proc AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 1996, 3, pp 14311439.Google Scholar
11. Lekhnitskii, S.G. Theory of elasticity of an anisotropic elastic body., 1963, Translated by Fern, P. Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
12. Hodges, D.H. Review of composite rotor blade modelling, AIAA J, 1990, 28, (3), pp 561565.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, E.R., Vasilev, V.V and Vasilev, D.V. Anisotropic thinwalled beams with closed cross-sectional contours, AIAA J, 2001, 39, (12), pp 23892393.Google Scholar
14. Cesnik, C.E.S. and Shin, S. On the modeling of integrally activated helicopter blades, Int J Solids and Structures, 2001, 38, pp 17651789.Google Scholar
15. Cesnik, C.E.S., Hodges, and Vabs, D.H.. A new concept for composite rotor cross-sectional blade modeling, J American Helicopter Soc, 1997, 42, (1), pp 2738.Google Scholar
16. Paik, J., Volovoi, V. and Hodges, D.H. Cross-sectional sizing and optimization of composite rotor blades, 2002 AIAA Paper 2002-1322, Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Dynamics and Materials Conference, Denver, Co, USA.Google Scholar
17. Bull, J.W. (Ed), Numerical Analysis and Modelling of Composite Materials, Chapter 1, analysis of composite rotor blades, 1995, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
18. Rand, O. Fundamental closed-form solutions for solid and thin-walled composite beams including a complete out-of-plane warping model, Int J Solid Struct, 1998, 35, (21), pp 2775–93.Google Scholar
19. Alkahe, J. and Rand, O. Analytic extraction of the elastic coupling mechanisms in composite blades, Composite Structures, 2000, 49, pp 399413.Google Scholar
20. Rand, O. On the importance of cross-sectional warping in solid composite beams, Composite Structures, 49, pp 393397.Google Scholar
21. Bauchau, O. A beam theory for anisotropic materials, J Appl Mech, 1985, 52, pp 4126–422.Google Scholar
22. Chattapadhyay, A., Zhang, S. and Jha, R. Structural and aeroelastic analysis of composite wing box sections using higher-order laminate theory, Proc AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 1996, 3, pp 21852198.Google Scholar
23. Chandra, R., Stemple, A.D. and Chopra, I. Thin-walled composite beams under bending, torsional and extensional loads, J Aircr, 1990, 27, (7), pp 619626.Google Scholar
24. Chandra, R. and Chopra, I. Structural behaviour of two-cell composite rotor blades with elastic couplings, AIAA J, 1992, 30, (12), pp 29142921.Google Scholar
25. Hill, G.F.J. and Weaver, P.M. Analysis of arbitrary beam sections with non-homogeneous anisotropic material properties, Proc of the 13th International Conference on Composite Materials, ICCM13, June 2001 Beijing.Google Scholar
26. Hill, G.F.J. and Weaver, P.M. Structural properties of helicopter rotor blade sections, Paper 55, Proc of the 28th European Rotorcraft Forum, September 2002, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
27. MSC PATRAN 2001, MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, 2975 Redhill Avenue, Costa Mesa, California 92626, USA.Google Scholar
28. MSC NASTRAN Version 70.7, MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, 2975 Redhill Avenue, Costa Mesa, California 92626, USA.Google Scholar
29. Gere, J.M. and Timoshenko, S.P. Mechanics of Materials, 1997, 4th Ed., London PWS, Boston, USA.Google Scholar