Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:17:08.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of Handley Page Jetstream handling during landing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. J. Mullen
G. J. Mullen*
Affiliation:
National Flying Laboratory Centre, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Handley Page Jetstream G-NFLC has for many years been used to complement the theoretical teaching material on undergraduate and postgraduate aeronautical engineering courses through a set of airborne laboratories designed to expose students to practical measurements in a realistic environment. It is suspected by some of the Cranfield test pilots that the aeroplane may be prone to pilot involved oscillations in pitch during the flare; the most likely causes are a deterioration in the short period dynamics at aft centre of gravity locations and adverse longitudinal stick force characteristics. To date however, no objective data has been available to support this hypothesis. This study reports upon an experiment designed to quantify these effects by identifying linear models of the short term dynamics from flight-test data, and assessing them against the Gibson drop-back and phase rate criteria. As expected, a rearward shift in the centre of gravity causes the airframe short period pitching oscillation (elevator deflection to pitch rate) to become more sluggish, thereby producing a significant reduction in dropback, which can be traced directly to the size of the static margin. The longitudinal stick force characteristics have a negative impact on the response, causing a reduction in dropback and a substantial increase in phase rate.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 105 , Issue 1048 , June 2001 , pp. 307 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stevens, J.R.A. Data recording and POSTFLT analysis software, user guide, V2.00, Cranfield Aerospace, 1995.Google Scholar
2. Gibson, J.C. Piloted Handling Qualities Design Criteria for High Order flight Control Systems, AGARD CP-333, 1982.Google Scholar
3. Gibson, J.C. Handling qualities for unstable combat aircraft, ICAS-86- 5.3.4, 1986.Google Scholar
4. Gibson, J.C. The definition, understanding and design of aircraft handling qualities, Delft University of Technology, Report LR-756, 1995.Google Scholar
5. Moou, H.A. Criteria for Low-Speed Longitudinal Handling Qualities of Transport Aircraft with Closed-Loop Flight Control Systems, Martinus Nijhoff, The Netherlands, 1984.Google Scholar
6. Cook, M.V. Flight Dynamics Principles, Arnold, 1997.Google Scholar
7. Hopkin, H.R. A scheme of notation and nomenclature for aircraft dynamics and associated aerodynamics, Aeronautical Research Council, Reports and Memoranda, No 3562, 1970.Google Scholar
8. MATLABTM signal processing toolbox, Version 3.0b, 1994.Google Scholar
9. Klein, V. Parameter Identification Applied to Aircraft, Cranfield Institute of Technology, College of Aeronautics, PhD thesis, 1973.Google Scholar
10. Baek, Y.H. An Experimental Review of Some Aircraft Parameter Identification Techniques, PhD thesis, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, 1998.Google Scholar
11. MATLABTM system identification toolbox, Version 3.0a, 1992.Google Scholar
12. Marodon, F.P.J. Investigation of a Pilot Induced Oscillation During Landing of the Jetstream 100 Aircraft G-NFLC, MSc thesis, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, 1999.Google Scholar
13. Mullen, G.J. and Marodon, F.P.J. An investigation of Handley Page Jeststream handling during landing — nonlinear aspects, ICAS 2000 Conference, paper no ICA0692.1, 27 August-1 September 2000.Google Scholar