Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:27:56.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of some experimental data on the cost effectiveness of flight simulators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

C. G. Durose
C. G. Durose*
Affiliation:
Research Branch, HQ, Royal Air Force Support Command
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of all the factors taken into account when justifying the use of flight simulators cost is most important. As one airline administrator put the case in 1970, ‘If simulators did not save the airlines money they would not exist however valid the other reasons are, we would have no difficulty in convincing ourselves that training in the air was better in every way’. In their 1977 study of the cost effectiveness of flight simulators for military training Orlansky and String could find only 30 studies between 1950-1977 which attempted to measure training effectiveness in a controlled and effective manner. This paper directs attention to one particular method of measuring training effectiveness, namely, the Incremental Transfer Effectiveness Function (ITEF).

Type
Flight Simulation Training Techniques
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 86 , Issue 853 , March 1982 , pp. 90 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1982 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Orlansky, J. and String, J. Cost Effectiveness of Flight Simulators for Military Training, Institute for Defence Analysis, IDA Paper P-1275, August 1977.Google Scholar
2. Roscoe, S. N. Incremental Transfer Effectiveness, Human Factors, 1971, 13, 561–567.Google Scholar
3. Povenmire, H. D. and Roscoe, S. N. Incremental Transfer Effectiveness of a Ground Based General Aviation Trainer, Human Factors 1973. 15, 534–542.Google Scholar
4. Bickley, W. R. Training Effectiveness Evaluations of the AH-1 Flight Simulator, Proceedings of the 2nd Interservice Industry Training Equipment Conference, Salt Lake City, November 1980.Google Scholar
5. Holman, G. L. Training Effectiveness of the CH-47 Flight Simulator US Army Research Institute for the Behavioural and Social Sciences, Research Report 1209, May 1979.Google Scholar
6. Carter, G. and Trollip, S. A Constrained Maximisation Extension to Incremental Transfer Effectiveness, or. How to Mix Your Training Technologies, Human Factors, 1980, 22(2), 141–152.Google Scholar