Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:31:12.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An airframe/inlet integrated full-waverider vehicle design using as upgraded aerodynamic method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2019

F. Ding ,
J. Liu ,
W. Huang ,
C. Peng  and
S. Chen
F. Ding*
Affiliation:
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory College of Aerospace Science and Engineering National University of Defense TechnologyChangsha Hunan 410073China
J. Liu
Affiliation:
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory College of Aerospace Science and Engineering National University of Defense TechnologyChangsha Hunan 410073China
W. Huang
Affiliation:
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory College of Aerospace Science and Engineering National University of Defense TechnologyChangsha Hunan 410073China
C. Peng
Affiliation:
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory College of Aerospace Science and Engineering National University of Defense TechnologyChangsha Hunan 410073China
S. Chen
Affiliation:
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory College of Aerospace Science and Engineering National University of Defense TechnologyChangsha Hunan 410073China
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the aims of overcoming the limitations of the existing basic flow model derived from an axisymmetric generating body and extending the aerodynamic design method of the airframe/inlet integrated waverider vehicle, this study develops an upgraded basic flow model derived from an axisymmetric shock wave. It then upgrades the design method for airframe/inlet integration of an air-breathing hypersonic waverider vehicle, which is termed the ‘full-waverider vehicle’ in this study. In this paper, first, the design principle and method for the upgraded full-waverider vehicle derived from an axisymmetric basic shock wave are described in detail. Second, an upgraded basic flow model that accounts for both internal and external flows is derived from an axisymmetric basic shock wave by use of both the streamline tracing method and the method of characteristics (MOC). Third, the upgraded full-waverider vehicle is developed from the upgraded basic flow model by the streamline tracing method. Fourth, the design theories and methodologies of both the upgraded basic flow model and the upgraded full-waverider vehicle are validated by a numerical computation method. Finally, the aerodynamic performances and viscous effects of both the upgraded basic flow model and the upgraded full-waverider vehicle are analysed by numerical computation. The obtained results show that the upgraded basic flow model and aerodynamic design method are effective for the design of the airframe/inlet integration of an air-breathing hypersonic waverider vehicle.

Keywords

Air-breathing hypersonic waverider vehicleAerodynamic design methodAirframe/inlet integrated full-waveriderAirframe/inlet integrated basic flow modelMOCstreamline tracing method
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 123 , Issue 1266 , August 2019 , pp. 1135 - 1169
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

O’Neill, M.K. Optimized scramjet engine integration on a waverider airframe, Ph.D., University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, 1992.Google Scholar
O’Neill, M.K. and Lewis, M.J. Optimized scramjet integration on a waverider, J Aircraft 1992, 29, (6), pp 1114–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, Y.C., Liang, D.W., Guo, R.W. and Huang, G.P. Overview of the integration of three-dimensional inward-turning hypersonic inlet and waverider forebody, Adv Mech, 2009, 39, (5), pp 513–525 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Ding, F., Liu, J., Shen, C.-B. and Huang, W. Novel inlet-airframe integration methodology for hypersonic waverider vehicles, Acta Astronaut, 2015, 111, pp 178–197.Google Scholar
Heiser, W.H. and Pratt, D.T. Hypersonic airbreathing propulsion, AIAA Inc., USA, 1994, pp 24–26.Google Scholar
Haney, J.W. and Beaulieu, W.D. Waverider inlet integration issues, AIAA Paper 94–0383, 1994.Google Scholar
Nonweiler, T.R.F. Aerodynamic problems of manned space vehicles, J Royal Aeronaut Soc, 1959, 63, pp 521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Ding, F., Huang, W. and Jin, L. Novel approach for designing a hypersonic gliding-cruising dual waverider vehicle, Acta Astronaut, 2014, 102, pp 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, F., Shen, C.-B., Liu, J. and Huang, W. Influence of surface pressure distribution of basic flow field on shape and performance of waverider, Acta Astronaut, 2015, 108, pp 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, F., Liu, J., Shen, C.-B. and Huang, W. Novel approach for design of a waverider vehicle generated from axisymmetric supersonic flows past a pointed von Karman ogive, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2015, 42, pp 297–308.Google Scholar
Ding, F., Shen, C.-B., Liu, J. and Huang, W. Comparison between novel waverider generated from flow past a pointed von Karman ogive and conventional cone-derived waverider, Proc IMechE Part G: J Aerosp Eng, 2015, 229, (14), pp 2620–2633.Google Scholar
Lobbia, M.A. and Suzuki, K. Experimental investigation of a Mach 3.5 waverider designed using computaional fluid dynamics, AIAA J, 2015, 53, (6), pp 1590–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, K., Li, G.-L., Xiao, Y. and Xu, Y.-Z. High-pressure capturing wing configurations, AIAA J, 2017, 55, (6), pp 1909–1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, F., Liu, J., Shen, C.-B., Liu, Z., Chen, S.-B. and Fu, X. An overview of research on waverider design methodology, Acta Astronaut, 2017, 140, pp 190–205.Google Scholar
Lewis, M.J. Application of waverider-based configurations to hypersonic vehicle design, AIAA Paper 91–3304, 1991.Google Scholar
Stevens, D.R. Practical considerations in waverider applications, AIAA Paper 92–4247, 1992.Google Scholar
Ding, F., Liu, J., Shen, C.-B., Huang, W., Liu, Z. and Chen, S.-H. An overview of waverider design concept in airframe/inlet integration methodology for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles, Acta Astronaut, 2018, 152, pp 639–656.Google Scholar
Starkey, R.P. and Lewis, M.J. Critical design issues for airbreathing hypersonic waverider missiles, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 2001, 38, (4), pp 510–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starkey, R.P. and Lewis, M.J. Aerodynamics of a box constrained waverider missile using multiple scramjets, AIAA Paper 99–2378, 1999.Google Scholar
Starkey, R.P., Rankins, F. and Pines, D. Coupled waverider/trajectory optimization for hypersonic cruise, AIAA Paper 2005–530, 2005.Google Scholar
Li, Y.Q., Han, W.Q. and You, Y.C. Integration waverider design of hypersonic inlet and forebody with preassigned pressure distirbution, Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin, 2016, 37, (9), pp 2711–2720 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Javaid, K.H. and Serghides, V.C. Airframe-propulsion integration methodology for waverider-derived hypersonic cruise aircraft design concepts, J Spacecr Rocket, 2005, 42, (4), pp 663–671.Google Scholar
Javaid, K.H. and Serghides, V.C. Thrust-matching requirements for the conceptual design of hypersonic waverider vehicles, J Aircraft, 2005, 42, (4), pp 1055–1064.Google Scholar
Lobbia, M. and Suzuki, K. Numerical investigation of waverider-derived hypersonic transport configurations, AIAA Paper 2003–3804, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takashima, N. and Lewis, M.J. Engine-airframe integration on osculating cone waverider-based vehicle designs. AIAA Paper 96–2551, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, T.F. RBCC engine-airframe integration on an osculating cone waverider vehicle, Ph.D., University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, T.F. and Lewis, M.J. RBCC engine-airframe integration on an osculating cone waverider vehicle, AIAA Paper 2000–3823, 2000.Google Scholar
O’Brien, T.F. and Lewis, M.J. Rocket-based combined-cycle engine integration on an osculating cone waverider vehicle, J Aircraft, 2001, 38, (6), pp 1117–1123.Google Scholar
Lyu, Z.J. and Wang, J.F. Design and comparative analysis of multistage compression cone-derived waverider and osculating cone waverider, J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut, 2015, 41, (11), pp 2103–2109 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wang, X.D., Wang, J.F. and Lyu, Z.J. A new integration method based on the coupling of mutistage osculating cones waverider and Busemann inlet for hypersonic airbreathing vehicles, Acta Astronaut, 2016, 126, pp 424–438.Google Scholar
He, X.Z., Le, J.L. and Wu, Y.C. Design of a curved cone derived waverider forebody, AIAA Paper 2009–7423, 2009.Google Scholar
He, X.Z., Le, J.L., Zhou, Z., Mao, P.F. and Wu, Y.C. Osculating inward turning cone waverider/inlet (OICWI) design methods and experimental study, AIAA Paper 2012–5810, 2012.Google Scholar
He, X.Z., Le, J.L., Zhou, Z. and Wei, F. Progress in waverider inlet integration study, AIAA Paper 2015–3685, 2015.Google Scholar
He, X.Z., Zhou, Z., Qin, S., Wei, F. and Le, J.L. Design and experimental study of a practical osculating inward cone waverider inlet, Chinese J Aeronaut, 2016, 29, (6), pp 1582–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodi, P.E. Engineering-based performance comparisons between osculating cone and osculating flowfield waveriders, AIAA Paper 2007–4344, 2007.Google Scholar
Rodi, P.E. Preliminary ramjet/scramjet integration with vehicles using osculating flowfields waverider forebodies, AIAA Paper 2012–3223, 2012.Google Scholar
You, Y.C., Zhu, C.X. and Guo, J.L. Dual waverider concept for the integration of hypersonic inward-turning inlet and airframe forebody, AIAA Paper 2009–7421, 2009.Google Scholar
Li, Y.Q., An, P., Pan, C.J., Chen, R.Q. and You, Y.C. Integration methodology for waverider-derived hypersonic inlet and vehicle forebody, AIAA Paper 2014–3229, 2014.Google Scholar
Cui, K., Hu, S.C., Li, G.L., Qu, Z.P. and Situ, M. Conceptual design and aerodynamic evaluation of hypersonic airplane with double flanking air inlets. Sci China Technol Sci, 2013, 56, (8), pp 1980–1988.Google Scholar
Atamanchuk, T., Sislian, J. and Dudebout, R. An aerospace plane as a detonation wave ramjet/airframe integrated waverider, AIAA Paper 92–5022, 1992.Google Scholar
Tarpley, C., and Lewis, M.J. Optimization of an engine-integrated waverider with steady state flight constraints. AIAA Paper 95–0848, 1995.Google Scholar
Tarpley, C. The optimization of engine-integrated hypersonic waveriders with steady state flight and static margin constraints, Ph.D., University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, 1995.Google Scholar
Newberry, C.F. The conceptual design of deck-launched waverider configured aircraft, AIAA Paper 95–6155, 1995.Google Scholar
Takashima, N. and Lewis, M.J. Optimization of waverider-based hypersonic cruise vehicles with off-design considerations, J Aircraft, 1999, 36, (1), pp 235–245.Google Scholar
Takashima, N. Optimization of waverider-based hypersonic vehicle designs, Ph.D., University of Maryland, College Park, 1997.Google Scholar
Zucrow, M.J. and Hoffman, J.D. Gas Dynamics, Vol. 2: Multidimensional Flow, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1977, pp 112–266.Google Scholar
Kothari, A.P., Tarpley, C., Mclaughlin, T.A., Babu, B.S. and Livingston, J.W. Hypersonic vehicle design using inward turning flow fields, AIAA Paper 96–2552, 1996.Google Scholar
Billig, F.S. and Kothari, A.P. Streamline tracing: technique for designing hypersonic vehicles, J Propuls Power, 2000, 16, (3), pp 465–471.Google Scholar
Fluent Inc., ANSYS FLUENT 13.0 Theory Guide, ANSYS, Inc., 2010.Google Scholar
Barth, T.J. and Jespersen, D. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes, AIAA Paper 89–0366, 1989.Google Scholar
Huang, W., Wang, Z.G., Pourkashanian, M., Ma, L., Ingham, D.B., Luo, S.B., Lei, J. and Liu, J. Numerical investigation on the shock wave transition in a three-dimensional scramjet isolator, Acta Astronaut, 2011, 68, pp 1669–1675.Google Scholar
Huang, W. and Wang, Z.G. Numerical study of attack angle characteristics for integrated hypersonic vehicle, Appl Math Mech (Engl Ed), 2009, 30, (6), pp 779–786.10.1007/s10483-009-0612-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W., Liu, W.D., Li, S.B., Xia, Z.X., Liu, J. and Wang, Z.G., Influences of the turbulence model and the slot width on the transverse slot injection flow field in supersonic flows, Acta Astronaut, 2012, 73, pp 1–9.Google Scholar
Mansour, K. and Khorsandi, M. The drag reduction in spherical spiked blunt body, Acta Astronaut, 2014, 99, pp 92–98.Google Scholar
Chen, X.Q., Hou, Z.X., Liu, J.X. and Gao, X.Z. Bluntness impact on performance of waverider, Comput. Fluids, 2011, 48, pp 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J.X., Hou, Z.X., Chen, X.Q. and Zhang, J.T. Experimental and numerical study on the aero-heating characteristics of blunted waverider, Appl. Therm Eng, 2013, 51, pp 301–314.Google Scholar
Roy, C.J. and Blottner, F.G. Review and assessment of turbulence models for hypersonic flows, Prog. Aerosp. Sci, 2006, 42, pp 469–530.Google Scholar
Reinartz, B.U., Herrmann, C.D. and Ballmann, J. Aerodyanmic performance analysis of a hypersonic inlet isolator using computation and experiment, J. Propuls Power, 2003, 19, (5), pp 868–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, F., Shen, C.-B., Huang, W. and Liu, J. Numerical validation and back-pressure effect on internal compression flows of typical supersonic inlet, Aeronaut J, 2015, 119, (1215), pp 631–645.Google Scholar
Schmitz, D.M. and Bissinger, N.C. Design and testing of 2-D fixed-geometry hypersonic intakes, AIAA Paper 98–1529, 1998.Google Scholar
Huang, P.G. and Coakley, T.J. Turbulence modeling for complex hypersonic flows, AIAA Paper 93–0200, 1993.Google Scholar
Li, S.X. The flow characteristics for the typical model in hypersonic flows, National Defence Industry Press, Beijing, 2007.Google Scholar