Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:20:16.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Air–to–ground targeting — UAVs, data links and interoperability (project Extendor)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

K. L Edwards
K. L Edwards*
Affiliation:
QinetiQ, Farnborough, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Time-critical targets will generally be observed or ‘sensed’ by personnel inadequately equipped to shoot at them. Since time may be a critical parameter, the passage of information from the ‘sensor’ to the ‘shooter’ must be rapid and accurate. QinetiQ has developed and integrated airborne and ground equipment to facilitate the passage of targeting data digitally over standard air and ground radios. The UK and Holland have selected an integrated rugged PC, internal modem card and purpose-designed software to equip Forward Air Controllers (FACs) to enable digital forward air control. This gives direct interoperability with UK and NATO assets equipped with Improved Data Modem (IDM) technology.

A large, and growing, number of air, land and sea assets employ Link-16. This entails entirely different frequency, data rate and, generally, protocol, from the IDM. The UK MoD’s recently-ended applied research EXTENDOR programme was a three-year operational concept demonstrator for the purpose of translating in near real-time between selected key Link-16 and IDM-based messages. The intention was to demonstrate the viability and utility of translation between disparate data links. This staged programme centred around a translation engine designed to be flown in a Predator UAV. The programme was entirely successful, demonstrating the capability to translate both own position and nine-line target data. Thus the position of a non-Link-16-equipped asset could be seen in real time in the Link-16 recognised air picture (RAP). Also, a Link-16 asset was shown to be able to task an IDM-equipped asset with a nine-line brief via the translation engine. The high equipment readiness level offers considerable potential for near-to-medium term operational exploitation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 108 , Issue 1088 , October 2004 , pp. 493 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kosovo and the continuing SEAD Challenge. The Royal Air Force Air Power Review, Winter 2002, 5, (4).Google Scholar
2. Block 22, JMO Syllabus on LOAC, US Navy War College.Google Scholar
3. Additional Protocol 1 to the Geneva Convention, Article 51(2).Google Scholar
4. JWP 0-01 British defence doctrine, London, CS(M)G, 1996.Google Scholar
5. Ministry of Defence (UK), Strategic Defence Review supporting essays (London: The Stationery Office, 1998), p 32.Google Scholar
6. Report tallies damage, Lists US Weaknesses, Aviation Week and Space Technology, 14 February 2000.Google Scholar
7. Air power in Afghanistan. The Royal Air Force Air Power Review, Winter 2002, 5, (4).Google Scholar
8. Aviation Week and Space Technology, 7 July 2003, p 49.Google Scholar
9. Reflective mood, Aviation Week and Space Technology, 14 July, 2003, p 40.Google Scholar
10. Close call, Aviation Week and Space Technology, 7 July 2003, p 49.Google Scholar
11. Forward air controllers or flag wavers? Seeking common ground. Jane’s International Defence Review 9/1999.Google Scholar
12. The New American Way of War, Foreign Affairs, July/August 2003.Google Scholar
13. Edwards, K.L. Background to the use of the improved data modem in the UK, Tactical Data Link conference, Abbey Wood, May 2002.Google Scholar
14. Edwards, K.L. and Lloyd, S.J. The use of third party targeting in precision air-to-ground operations, J Defence Science, January 2002, 7, (1).Google Scholar
15. Edwards, K.L. Target tracking (sensor-to-shooter in practice – the Jaguar aircraft). SMi Sensor to Shooter conference, London, 26–27 June 2002.Google Scholar
16. MoD Contracts Bulletin 9 July 2002, Future Purchase Number SANSC2/04035 Google Scholar
17. Fatal US Training Accident. In Brief – Jane’s Defence Weekly – 16 March 2001.Google Scholar
18. Special Report – Afghanistan: the Key Lessons. Jane’s Defence Weekly – 2 January 2002.Google Scholar
19. NATO battles against the elements. Headlines – Jane’s Defence Weekly, 21 April 1999.Google Scholar
20. Kosovo bombing misses the target, says MoD report. Flight International, 15–21 August 2000.Google Scholar
21. F-14 upgrades to improve strike, recon for air war. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 7 June 1999.Google Scholar
22. Topiwala, P.N. (Ed), Wavelet Image and Video Compression, Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA 1998.Google Scholar
23. Airborne warning And control system (AWACS) Sentry lessons learned from Kosovo. Flight International, 15 – 21 September 1999.Google Scholar