Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:51:53.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Airline flight departure procedures — choosing between noise abatement, minimum fuel consumption and minimum cost

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. E. Jones
R. E. Jones*
Affiliation:
Airbus Industrie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The advent of the commercial jet air liner, two decades ago, and growing public awareness of the noise of aircraft operations, led to the adoption by airlines of two distinct take-off departure procedures. A Standard Procedure for aircraft departures is usually recommended by the aircraft manufacturer, such that the air liner is operated in a safe and expeditious manner. A Noise Abatement Procedure was devised to reduce the noise impact of airline operations in the airport community environs. Generally, noise abatement procedures were thought to increase pilot work load and, therefore, reduce margins of safety, and increase fuel consumption.

In the 1960s, when most of the air liners were powered by low by-pass ratio engines, the noise abatement procedure included a so called cut-back. This procedure included throttling back from take-off thrust (TOT) to less than climb thrust shortly after take-off (during cut-back) to benefit those communities living close to the airport. Subsequently climb thrust (MCLT) would be applied.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 85 , Issue 843 , April 1981 , pp. 154 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. FAA AC 91-39. Recommended noise abatement take-off and departure procedures for civil turbojet powered airplanes. 18th January 1974.Google Scholar
2. FAA AC 91-53. Noise abatement departure profiles. 17th October 1978.Google Scholar
3. Boeing. Noise course for performance engineers. February 1978.Google Scholar
4. Unpublished study prepared for the 68th meeting of the IATA Technical Committee. October 1978.Google Scholar
5. Federal Aviation Regulation Part 36. Noise Standards: Aircraft Type Certification. US Federal Aviation Administration.Google Scholar
6. Performance Engineers Manual B747. Boeing Document D6-34128,1976.Google Scholar
7. Performance Engineers Manual B737. Boeing Document P.E.M. 30,1972.Google Scholar
8. Community Noise Document B747. Boeing Document D6-30867,1972.Google Scholar
9. Community Noise Document B737. Boeing Document D6-42144,1974.Google Scholar
10. Federal Aviation Regulation Part 25. Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes. US Federal Aviation Administration.Google Scholar
11. Standard Instrument Departure (SID). Noise Abatement Procedures, Manchester, UK. Jeppesen Airways Charts, May 1979.Google Scholar
12. Wire to KLM and Qantas. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Group. Circa 1978.Google Scholar
13. Hot section component life benefits using reduced thrust. Letter from Pratt and Whitney Aircraft to CP Air, 1976.Google Scholar