Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:49:08.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aircraft that fly backwards? The application of forward swept wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Dennis Howe*
Affiliation:
College of Aeronautics, Cranfield

Extract

It was recognised over 40 years ago that sweeping the wing of an aircraft could be used to offset the effects of compressibility. However, by no means all of the earlier swept-back wing aircraft used sweep for performance reasons. Some, such as the Horten tailless gliders built in Germany, had swept back wings to ensure necessary longitudinal stability. Likewise the Messerschmitt Me163 rocket interceptor employed a swept back wing as an essential feature of its layout but it operated at a sufficiently high Mach number for the beneficial aerodynamic effects of sweep to be of value. From the compressibility point of view, the wing may be either swept back or swept forward, and the idea of forward sweep was incorporated in the Junkers Ju287 jet propelled bomber (Fig. 1). The 18 degrees forward sweep enabled the wing-fuselage intersection to be positioned behind the deep bomb-bay and thus avoided a difficult structural cut-out problem. A more elegant solution to the same difficulty was the ‘crescent’ swept-back wing layout for the Handley-Page Victor bomber.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Howe, D. A comparison between forward and aft swept wings on V/STOL combat aircraft. Bristol Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
2. Paisley, D. J. and Poll, D. I. A. Laminar flow and transition on swept wings. Bristol Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
3. Chen, R. and Butler, R. J. Divergence of forward swept wings. Bristol Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
4. Qui, C. H. and Poll, D. I. A. A comparison of the aerodynamic characteristics of swept-forward and swept-back wings, including the effects of strake. Bristol Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
5. Fielding, J. P. A supersonic V/STOL fighter design project. The Aeronautical Journal. August 1982, 86, 857.Google Scholar