Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T23:22:20.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Air Travel – Greener by Design Mitigating the environmental impact of aviation: Opportunities and priorities

Part of: Sustainable Aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

Report of the Air Travel - Greener by Design Science and Technology Sub Group
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Technology Sub-Group of Air Travel – Greener by Design was instituted at the first full meeting of the GBD community in March 2000. Its first period of intense activity was from the summer of 2000 to the spring of 2001, culminating in the publication of its report The Technology Challenge in July 2001 at the first Air Travel – Greener by Design Conference at the Royal Aeronautical Society.

In the period that followed, the contents of the report were further disseminated by presentations at conferences and publication of the report in The Aeronautical Journal but there was no substantial activity by the Sub-Group as such. In July 2003, a workshop on ‘The Effect of Aviation on the Atmosphere’, was held at St Catherine’s College, Cambridge. This was planned jointly by members of the Sub-Group and of the Centre for Atmospheric Science in the Department of Chemistry at Cambridge and was jointly funded by GBD and the EC project SCENIC. The organisation of events on the day and the collating and editing of the workshop report was done by Dr Helen Rogers of the Centre for Atmospheric Science. The workshop was attended by a broad cross section from the manufacturing and operating industries, government and academia and its report is a valuable summary of current understanding in 2003.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 109 , Issue 1099 , September 2005 , pp. 361 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Department for Transport, Aviation and the environment: using economic instruments, March 2003.Google Scholar
2. Thorpe, A.J., Lee, D.S., Rogers, H.L., Forster, P.M., De, F., Clift, R., Poll, D.I.A., Raper, D. and Pyle, J.A.. 2005 Aviation impacts on the atmosphere, Report of the Town Meeting held by NCAS on 11/12 November 2004, available from the authors and from http://ncas.nerc.ac.uk Google Scholar
3. Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe, Strategic Research Agenda (SRA-1), October 2002.Google Scholar
4. Green, J.E.. Greener by Design – The Technology Challenge, Aeronaut J, February 2002, 106, (1056), pp 57–103 and erratum, February 2005, 109, (1092), pp 98–99.Google Scholar
5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, 1999, University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
6. Rogers, H.L., Lee, D.S., Raper, D.W., Foster, P.M.Def., Wilson, C.W. and Newton, P.J.. The impacts of aviation on the atmosphere, Aeronaut J, October 2002, 104, (1064), pp 521–546.Google Scholar
7. Eyers, C.J., Norman, P., Middel, J., Plohr, M., Michot, S., Atkinson, K. and Christou, R.A. AERO2k Global aviation emissions inventories for 2002 and 2025, QINETIQ/04/01113, available at http://www.cate.mmu.ac.uk/reports_AERO2k.asp.Google Scholar
8. Gauss, M., Isaksen, I., Grewe, V., Köhler, M., Hauglustaine, D. and Lee, D.. Impact of aircraft NOx emissions: effect of changing the flight altitude. Proceedings of EC conference Aviation, Atmosphere and Climate, Friedrichshafen, Germany, 30 June-3 July 2003, EOR 21051.Google Scholar
9. Saynor, R., Bauen, A. and Leach, M.. The potential for renewable energy sources in aviation, Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and Technology, London, August 2003.Google Scholar
10. Holbeche, T.A. and Hazell, A.F.. An experimental study of wing shielding of noise by a Lockheed TriStar aircraft, RAE Tech Report 82048, April 1982.Google Scholar
11. Kuchemann, D., The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft, Pergamon, 1978.Google Scholar
12. Peel, C.J.. Advances in materials for aerospace, December 1996, Aeronaut J, 100, (1000), pp 487–503.Google Scholar
13. Denisov, V.E., Bolsunovky, A.L, Buzoverya, N.P. and Gurevich, B.I.. Recent investigations of the very large passenger blended wing-body aircraft, Proceedings of ICAS 98 Congress, paper 4.10.2, September 1998 Google Scholar
14. Henke, R., Capbern, P., Davies, A.J., Hinsinger, R. and Santana, J.L.. The A320 HLF Fin Programme: objectives and challenges, Proceedings of 2nd European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, Bordeaux, 10-12 June 1996.Google Scholar
15. Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, Natural laminar flow airfoil analysis and trade studies, NASA Contractor Report 159029, May 1979 Google Scholar
16. Sawyers, D.M. and Wilson, R.A.L.. Assessment of the impact of hybrid laminar flow on a large subsonic aircraft, Proceedings of 2nd European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, Bordeaux, 10-12 June 1996.Google Scholar
17. Wong, P.W.C. and Maina, M.. Flow control studies for military aircraft applications, AIAA 2nd Flow Control Conference, Portland, Ore, 2004, AIAA 2004-2313.Google Scholar
18. Liebeck, R.H., Page, M.A. and Rawdon, B.K.. Blended wing-body subsonic commercial transport, AIAA-98-0438, 1998.Google Scholar
19. Lachmann, G.V. (Ed) Boundary Layer and Flow Control, Pergamon Press, 1961.Google Scholar
20. Daggart, D.L., Kawai, R. and Friedman, D.. Blended wing-body systems studies: boundary layer ingestion inlets with active flow control, NASA CR-2003-212670.Google Scholar
21. Kim, H.D. and Sanders, J.D.. Embedded wing propulsion conceptual study, NASA TM-2003-212696.Google Scholar
22. Air Travel – Greener by Design, Air Travel: Improving Operations; The Technology Challenge; Market-Based Options, February 2002.Google Scholar
23. ICAO, Operational opportunities to minimise fuel use and reduce emissions, proposed ICAO Circular, CAEP/50IP/4, January 2001.Google Scholar
24. Fichter, C., Marquart, S., Sausen, R., Lee, D.S. and Norman, P.D.. Impact of cruise altitude on contrails, Proceedings of EC conference Aviation, Atmosphere and Climate, Friedrichshafen, Germany, 30 June – 3 July 2003, EOR 21051.Google Scholar
25. Williams, V., Noland, R.B. and Toumi, R.. Reducing the climate change impacts of aviation by restricting cruise altitudes, Transportation Research, 2002 D, 7, (6), pp 451–464.Google Scholar
26. Williams, V., Noland, R.B. and Toumi, R.. Variability of contrail formation conditions and the implications for policies to reduce the climate impacts of aviation, 2005, draft in preparation ([email protected]).Google Scholar
27. Whellens, M.W. and Singh, R.. Propulsion system optimisation for minimum Global Warming Potential, Proceedings of ICAS 2002 Congress, Toronto, September 2002, Paper 7111.Google Scholar
28. Influence of engine cycle on emissions, Aeronet Working paper No. 2, Results of a workshop held at Munich on 14 September 1999.Google Scholar
29. Mannstein, H. and Schumann, U.. Observation of contrails and cirrus over Europe, Proceedings of EC conference Aviation, Atmosphere and Climate, Friedrichshafen, Germany, 30 June-3 July 2003, EOR 21051.Google Scholar