Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:43:13.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aerofoil ground effect revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

C. Coulliette  and
A. Plotkin
C. Coulliette
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering MechanicsSan Diego State UniversityCalifornia, USA
A. Plotkin
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering MechanicsSan Diego State UniversityCalifornia, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Steady state aerofoil ground effect is studied both numerically and analytically. Discrete vortex and linear vortex panel methods are applied to a parabolic arc and symmetric Joukowski aerofoil, respectively. A single vortex model for the flow over the parabolic arc aerofoil is developed. The single vortex model and other analytical solutions, valid either near or far from the ground, are compared with the numerical results. The numerical results are used to delineate the influences of angle of attack, camber and thickness. For small values of camber and angle of attack, normalised lift is enhanced near the ground and reduced far from it. For a fixed distance above the ground, normalised lift decreases with increasing angle of attack and camber. Thickness reduces lift at all heights above the ground.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 100 , Issue 992 , February 1996 , pp. 65 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wieselsberger, C. Wing resistance near the ground, NACA TM-77, 1922.Google Scholar
2. Tomotika, S., Nagamiya, T. and Takenouti, Y. The lift on a flat plate placed near a plane wall, with special reference to the effect of the ground upon the lift of a monoplane aerofoil, Aeron Res Inst, Tokyo Imperial Univ, August 1933, Report No 97, as reported in Pistolesi(3).Google Scholar
3. Pistolesi, E. Ground effect — theory and practice, NACA TM-828, 1935.Google Scholar
4. Havelock, T.H. The lift and moment on a flat plate in a stream of finite width, Proc R Soc, 1938, A166, pp 178–196.Google Scholar
5. Green, A.E. The forces acting on the circular-arc aerofoil in a stream bounded by a plane wall, Proc London Math Soc, 1940, 46, pp 19–54.Google Scholar
6. Green, A.E. The two-dimensional aerofoil in a bounded stream, Q J Maths, 1947, 18, pp 167–177.Google Scholar
7. Tomotika, S., Hasimoto, Z. and Urano, K. The forces acting on an aerofoil of approximate Joukowski type in a stream bounded by a plane wall, Q J Mech Appl Math, 1951, 4, pp 289–307.Google Scholar
8. Tomotika, S., Tamada, K. and Umemoto, H. The lift and moment acting on a circular-arc aerofoil in a stream bounded by a plane wall, Q J Mech Appl Math, 1951, pp 1–22.Google Scholar
9. Tuck, E.O. A nonlinear unsteady one-dimensional theory for wings in extreme ground effect, J Fluid Mech, 1980, 98, pp 37–47.Google Scholar
10. Tuck, E.O. Steady flow and static stability of aerofoils in extreme ground effect, J Eng Math, 1981, 15, pp 89–102.Google Scholar
11. Katz, J. and Plotkin, A. Low-speed aerodynamics: from wing theory to panel methods, McGraw-Hill, 1991, pp 187–191, 303-309 and 369-375.Google Scholar
12. Plotkin, A. and Kennell, C. Thickness-induced lift on a thin aerofoil in ground effect, AIAA J, 1981, 19, (11), pp 1484–1486.Google Scholar
13. Katz, J. Calculation of the aerodynamic forces on automotive lifting surfaces, J Fluids Eng, December 1985, 26, pp 438–443.Google Scholar
14. Nuhait, A.O. and Mook, D.T. Numerical simulation of wings in Steady and unsteady ground effects, J Aircr, December 1989, 26, pp 1081–1089.Google Scholar
15. Nuhait, A.O. and Zedan, M.F. Numerical simulation of unsteady flow induced by a flat plate moving near ground, J Aircr, September 1993, 30, pp 611–617.Google Scholar
16. Zedan, M.F. and Nuhait, A.O. Unsteady effects of camber on the aerodynamic characteristics of a thin aerofoil moving near ground, Aeronaut J, November 1992, 96, (959), pp 343–350.Google Scholar
17. Giesing, J.P. Potential flow about two-dimensional aerofoils, Douglas Aircraft Company Report LB31946, December 1965.Google Scholar
18. Yon, S.A. Systematic formulation and analysis of 2-D panel methods, MS Thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, Summer 1990.Google Scholar