Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T09:57:36.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aeroelasticity analysis of a bird-damaged fan assembly using a large numerical model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. Imregun  and
M. Vahdati
M. Imregun
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK
M. Vahdati
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bird strike is a major consideration when designing fans for civil aero engines. Current methods rely on impact tests and structural optimisation but it is highly desirable to have predictive numerical models to assess the aerodynamic and aeroelastic stability of bird-damaged fan assemblies. A detailed feasibility study towards such a prediction capability, consisting of a CFD solver coupled to a finite element representation of the structure, is reported in this paper. A whole-assembly model was used for both the fluid and the structural domains, an approach necessitated by the loss of cyclic symmetry due to one or more blades undergoing plastic deformation under the effect of the bird impact. It was assumed that two consecutive blades had suffered unequal amount of bird damage, the so-called heavy and medium-damaged blades.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 103 , Issue 1030 , December 1999 , pp. 569 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Marshall, J.G. and Imregun, M. A survey of aeroelasticity methods with emphasis on turbomachinery applications, J of Fluid and Structures, 1996, 10, pp 237–267.Google Scholar
2. Cumpsty, N. Compressor Aerodynamics, Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, 1989.Google Scholar
3. Chew, J.W., Marshall, J.G., Vahdati, M. and Imregun, M. Part-speed flutter analysis of a wide-chord fan blade, 8th Int Symp on Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines, Stockholm, 1997.Google Scholar
4. Sayma, A.I., Vahdati, M., Imregun, M. and Green, J.S. Whole-assembly flutter analysis of a low pressure turbine blade. Aeronaut J, 1998, October-December 1998, 102. (1018), pp 459–463.Google Scholar
5. Denton, J.D. The use of a distributed body force to simulate viscous effecLs in 3D flow calculations, ASME Paper 86-GT-I44, 1986.Google Scholar
6. Emmons, H.W., Pearson, C.E. and Grant, H.P. Compressor surge and stall propagation. Trans ASME, 1955, 77, pp 455–469.Google Scholar
7. Moore, F.K. and Greitzer, E.M. A theory of post-stall transients in axial compressors — Part I Development of equations, ASME J of Eng for Gas Turb and Power, 1986, 108, pp 68–76.Google Scholar
8. Sisto, F., Wu, W., Tangham, S. and Jonnavithula, S. Computational aerodynamics of an oscillating cascade with evolution of rotating stall, A1AA J, 1989. 27, (4), pp 462–471.Google Scholar
9. Longley, J.P. A review of non-steady flow models for compressor stability, ASME paper 93-GT-17, 1993.Google Scholar
10. Outa, E., Kato, D. and Chiba, K. A Navier-Stokes simulation of stall cell behaviour in a 2D compressor rotor-stator system at various loads. ASME paper 94-GT-257, 1994.Google Scholar
11. He, L. Computational study of rotating stall inception in axial compressors, AlAA J of Prop and Power, 1997,13, (1), pp 31–38.Google Scholar
12. Ismael, J.O. and He, L. 3-D Navier-Stokes computation of rotating stall inception in a fan rotor. Proc of the 2nd European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid-Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Antewerpen, Belgium, 1997.Google Scholar
13. Saxer, A.P., Saxer-Felici, H.M., Ginter, F., Inderbitzin, A. and Gyarmathy, G. Structure and propagation of rotating stall cells in an axial compressor stage, IMechE paper C557/097/99, Proc 3rd European Conference on Turbomachinery, London, 1999, pp 605-618.Google Scholar
14. Ferrari, E., Vahdati, M. and Imregun, M. Flutter stability analysis of a bird-damaged fan assembly, IMechE paper C557/116/99 Proc 3rd European Conference on Turbomachinery, London, 1999, pp 365-376.Google Scholar
15. Vahdati, M. and Imregun, M. A non-linear integrated aeroelasticity analysis of a fan blade using unstructured dynamic meshes, J of Mech Eng Sci, Part C, 1996, 210, pp 549–564.Google Scholar
16. Sayma, A.I., Vahdati, M., Sbardella, L. and Imregun, M. Modelling of 3D viscous compressible turbomachinery flows using unstructured hybrid grids, unpublished.Google Scholar
17. Baldwin, B. and Barth, T. A one-equation turbulence transport model for high Reynolds number wall-bounded flows, AIAA Paper 91-0610, 1991.Google Scholar
18. Wilcox, D.C. Turbulence Modelling for CFD. DCW Industries, La Canada, Canada, 1993.Google Scholar
19. Sbardella, L., Sayma, A.I. and Imregun, M. Semi-unstructured mesh generator for flow calculations in axial turbomachinery blading, Proc of the 8th Int Symp on Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines, Stockholm, 1997.Google Scholar
20. Roe, P. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes, J of Comp Phy, 1981,43, pp 357–372.Google Scholar
21. Swanson, R.C. and Turkel, E. On central difference and upwind schemes, J of Comp Phy, 1992,101, pp 292–306.Google Scholar