Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:12:14.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aeroelastic design and flight test evaluation of the Ranger 2000 training aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. Schweiger
Affiliation:
Daimler Benz Aerospace, Military Aircraft Munich, Germany
F. Weiss
Affiliation:
Daimler Benz Aerospace, Military Aircraft Munich, Germany
S. K. Dobbs
Affiliation:
Rockwell International — North American Aircraft , Seal Beach, California, USA

Abstract

The paper describes the aeroelastic analysis for the design, the ground verification tests and the flight test programme, for the Ranger 2000 training aircraft, developed jointly by Dasa and Rockwell International between 1991 and 1994, as a competitor for the next generation US Air Force and Navy Joint Primary Advanced Training System (JPats). Special efforts with respect to the aeroelastic stability were required for the T-tail configuration, for the design of the manual flight control system, and for the establishment of sufficient mass balance for the control surfaces. Several ground vibration tests were performed for the complete aircraft and for individual components for all major design improvements during the flight test evaluation. To minimise the required time for these tests, highly modular test equipment was required. For an efficient flutter flight test programme a reliable excitation system was chosen. This system consists of slotted rotating cylinders, mounted on small vanes, which can be attached to any aerodynamic surface. This equipment creates defined unsteady aerodynamic forces to excite the eigenmodes of the structure.

Quasi-on-line frequency and damping data evaluation between consecutive flight test points was made possible by installing the required hardware and software directly at the flight test quick-look control room, for the direct use of telemetry data. With this approach only a small number of dedicated flutter flights was required.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Krammer, J. Practical architecture of design optimisation software for aircraft structures taking the MBB-Lagrange code as an example, AGARD Lecture Series 186, Integrated design analysis and optimisation of aircraft structures, May 1992.Google Scholar
2. Gödel, H. Recent developmnts in structural optimisation with respect to dynamic and aeroelastic problems, In proceedings of the International forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Aachen, June 1991.Google Scholar
3. Giesing, J.P., Kalmann, T.P. and Rodden, W.P. Subsonic steady and oscillatory aerodynamics for multiple interfering wings and bodies, AFFDL-TR-71-5, 1991.Google Scholar
4. French, M., Noll, T., Cooley, D., Moore, R. and Zapata, F. Flutter investigation involving a free floating aileron, AIAA-87-0909.Google Scholar
5. Weiss, F., Schweiger, J. and Hönlinger, H. Meeting on advanced aeroelastic testing and data analysis, Rotterdam, May 1994.Google Scholar
6. Bak, D.J. Rotating cylinder excites in-flight vibration modes. Design News, March 1989.Google Scholar