Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:19:23.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aerodynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. B. Haines
A. B. Haines*
Affiliation:
Aircraft Research Association
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This Convention poses a challenge to the lecturers. It asks us to gaze into a crystal ball and to forecast the future on the basis of the research of today. My contribution is to review the aerodynamics scene. I am the first specialist lecturer; this is perhaps a recognition that many of the significant advances of the past have been aerodynamically inspired. It is natural to start by thinking back 20 years and asking whether we would then have predicted what has come true today. In aerodynamics, there is obviously a clear answer to this question.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 80 , Issue 787 , July 1976 , pp. 277 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1976 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Morgan, M. A new shape in the sky. The Aeronautical Journal, Vol 76, No 733, pp. 1–18, January 1972.Google Scholar
2. Maskell, E. C. Flow separation in three dimensions. RAE Report Aero 2565, November 1955.Google Scholar
3. Maskell, E. C. and Kuchemann, D. Controlled separation in aerodynamic design. RAE TM Aero 463, March 1956.Google Scholar
4. Kuchemann, D. Aerodynamic design. The Aeronautical Journal, February 1969.Google Scholar
5. Nonweiler, T. Delta wings of shapes amenable to exact shock-wave theory. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 67, p. 39, January 1963.Google Scholar
6. Jones, J. G. A method for designing lifting configurations for high supersonic speeds using the flow fields of nonlifting cones. RAE TR Aero 2674, 1963.Google Scholar
7. Gaster, M. On the flow along swept leading edges. C of A Note Aero 167, October 1965.Google Scholar
8. Landeryou, R. R. and Porter, P. G. Further tests of a laminar flow swept wing with boundary layer control by suction. C of A Report Aero 192, May 1966.Google Scholar
9. Pfenninger, W. and Bacon, J. W. Jr. About the development of swept laminar suction wings with full chord laminar flow. Boundary layer and flow control. Vol 2, Ed. Lachmann, G. V., Pergamon Press, 1961.Google Scholar
10. Gaster, M. A simple device for preventing turbulent contamination on swept leading edges. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 69, No 659, p. 788, November 1965.Google Scholar
11. Edwards, J. B. A carefully considered assessment of the reduction of direct operating cost made possible by laminar flow. ARC 20 967, April 1959.Google Scholar
12. Longer-range technology offers fuel saving. Aviation Week, November 1975.Google Scholar
13. Lee, G. H. Possibilities of cost reduction with all-wing aircraft. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 69, No 659, pp 744–749, November 1965.Google Scholar
14. Bocci, A. J. To be published.Google Scholar
15. Transonic Aerodynamics. AGARD CP 35, September 1968.Google Scholar
16. Krupp, J. A. The numerical calculation of plane steady transonic flows past lifting aerofoils. Boeing Scientific Research Lab. Paper D180-12958-1, 1971.Google Scholar
17. Murman, E. M. and Cole, J. D. Calculation of plane steady transonic flows. Boeing Scientific Research Lab, Paper D1-82-0943, 1970.Google Scholar
18. Garabedian, P. R. and Korn, D. G. Analysis of transonic aerofoils. Com. Pure Appl. Math., 24, 841–851, 1971.Google Scholar
19. Lock, R. C. Research in the UK on finite difference methods for computing steady transonic flows. IUTAM Symposium II, Göttingen 1975, Spr.-Verlag 1976.Google Scholar
20. Catherall, D. The computation of transonic flows past aerofoils in solid, porous or slotted wind tunnels. AGARD CP 174, 1975.Google Scholar
21. Albone, C. M., Hall, M. G., and Joyce, Gaynor. Numerical solutions for transonic flows past wing-body combinations. IUTAM Symposium II, Göttingen 1975, Spr.-Verlag 1976.Google Scholar
22. Baker, T. J. A numerical method to compute inviscid transonic flows around axisymmetric ducted bodies. IUTAM Symposium II, Göttingen 1975, Spr.-Verlag 1976. Also ARA Memo 173 and Addendum, January 1976.Google Scholar
23. Langley, M. J. Numerical methods for two-dimensional and axisymmetric transonic flows. ARA Memo 143, August 1973.Google Scholar
24. Young, C. An investigation of annular aerofoils for turbofan engine cowls. RAE TR 69285, December 1969.Google Scholar
25. Callaghan, J. G., and Beatty, T. D. A theoretical method for the analysis and design of multi-component aerofoils. AIAA 72-3, 1972.Google Scholar
26. Stevens, W. A., Goradia, S. H., Braden, J. A., and Morgan, M. L. Mathematical model for two-dimensional multi-component aerofoils in viscous flow. AIAA 72-2, 1972.Google Scholar
27. Williams, B. R., and Woodward, D. S. RAE unpublished communication.Google Scholar
28. Haines, A. B. Some evidence concerning scale effect on low speed stalling characteristics. ARA Memo 52, October 1964.Google Scholar
29. LaWs Group. The need for large wind tunnels in Europe. AGARD AR 60, December 1972.Google Scholar
30. Haines, A. B. Further evidence and thoughts on scale effects at high subsonic speeds. AGARD CP 174, October 1975.Google Scholar
31. Peckham, D. H. Multivariate analysis applied to aircraft optimisation—a first progress report. RAE unpublished work.Google Scholar
32. Edwards, J. B., Kirkpatrick, D. L. I. and Edwards, J. B. W. A forecast of CTOL transport aircraft developments including the effect of a fuel price increase. RAE unpublished work.Google Scholar
33. Lock, R. C. and Fulker, J. L. Design of supercritical aerofoils. The Aeronautical Quarterly, November 1974.Google Scholar
34. Goodmanson, L. T. Transonic transports. Proceedings, 12th Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference, Calgary, 1971.Google Scholar
35. Pearcey, H. H. Aerodynamic design of section shapes for swept wings. Advances in Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 3, pp 277–323, Pergamon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
36. ESDU Item No 71019.Google Scholar
37. ESDU Item No 71020.Google Scholar
38. ESDU Item No 67011.Google Scholar
39. Bocci, A. J. Unpublished ARA Report.Google Scholar
40. Chichester-Miles, I. The economic utilisation of resources through aviation. The Aeronautical Journal, October 1974.Google Scholar
41. Bowden, M. K., Sweep, H. S. and Waters, Mark H. Design of short haul aircraft for fuel conservation. SAE Report 75-0587, May 1975.Google Scholar
42. Kirkpatrick, D. L. I. and Peckham, D. H. Multivariate analysis applied to aircraft optimisation—some effects of research advances on the design of future subsonic transport aircraft. DGLR Jahrestagung 5th, Berlin, 4th-6th October 1972. Paper 72-093.Google Scholar
43. Astronautics & Aeronautics, February 1976.Google Scholar
44. Aviation Week, 10th November 1975.Google Scholar
45. Woodward, D. S. RAE unpublished communication.Google Scholar
46. Ashill, P. R. A theoretical and experimental investigation of the external-flow, jet-augmented flap. AGARD CP 135, September 1973.Google Scholar
47. Ashill, P. R. and Foster, D. N. The flow around a wing with an external-flow jet flap. AGARD CP 143, April 1974.Google Scholar
48. Goldsmith, H. A. and Leyman, C. Aircraft considerations for advanced SST propulsion systems. 3rd International Symposium on air-breathing engines, Munich, 1976.Google Scholar
49. Tomlinson, B. N. Direct lift control in a large transport aircraft—simulator study of proportional DLC. RAE TR 72154, July 1972.Google Scholar
50. Pinsker, W. J. G. Active control as an integral tool in advanced aircraft designs. AGARD CP 157, October 1974.Google Scholar
51. Wilkinson, K. G. The technology and economics of air transport in its next phase. 64th Wright Memorial Lecture. The Aeronautical Journal, Vol 80, No 783, pp 102–127, March 1976.Google Scholar