Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T05:49:30.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The aerodynamic challenges of aeroengine gas-turbine combustion systems

Part of: RAeS Lanchester Lecture Papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

J. J. McGuirk
J. J. McGuirk*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical & Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The components of an aeroengine gas-turbine combustor have to perform multiple tasks – control of external and internal air distribution, fuel injector feed, fuel/air atomisation, evaporation, and mixing, flame stabilisation, wall cooling, etc. The ‘rich-burn’ concept has achieved great success in optimising combustion efficiency, combustor life, and operational stability over the whole engine cycle. This paper first illustrates the crucial role of aerodynamic processes in achieving these performance goals. Next, the extra aerodynamic challenges of the ‘lean-burn’ injectors required to meet the ever more stringent NOx emissions regulations are introduced, demonstrating that a new multi-disciplinary and ‘whole system’ approach is required. For example, high swirl causes complex unsteady injector aerodynamics; the threat of thermo-acoustic instabilities means both aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of injectors and other air admission features must be considered; and high injector mass flow means potentially strong compressor/combustor and combustor/turbine coupling. The paper illustrates how research at Loughborough University, based on complementary use of advanced experimental and computational methods, and applied to both isolated sub-components and fully annular combustion systems, has improved understanding and identified novel ideas for combustion system design.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 118 , Issue 1204 , June 2014 , pp. 557 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Mosier, S.A. and Pierce, R.M. Advanced combustion systems for stationary gas turbine engines: Vol. 1 – review and preliminary evaluation, US Environmental Protection Agency Report No. EPA-600/7-80-0171, 1980.Google Scholar
2. http://www.rolls-royce.com/civil/products/largeaircraft/trent_700/Google Scholar
3. Mongia, H.C. GE Aviation low emissions combustion technology evolution, SAE Paper 2007-01-3924, AeroTech Congress and Exposition, Los Angeles, USA, September 2007.Google Scholar
4. McKinney, R.G., Sepulveda, D., Sowa, W. and Cheung, A.K. The Pratt and Whitney TALON X low emissions combustor: revolutionary results with evolutionary technology, AIAA-2007-386, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, USA, January 2007.Google Scholar
5. Klein, A. Characteristics of combustor diffusers, Prog in Aerospace Sci, 31, 1995, pp 171–271.Google Scholar
6. Fishenden, C.R. and Stevens, S.J. Performance of annular combustor dump diffusers, J Aircr, 1977, 14, pp 60–67.Google Scholar
7. Barker, A.G. and Carrotte, J.F. Influence of compressor exit conditions on combustor annular diffusers, Part I: diffuser performance, J Prop Power, 17, 2001, pp 678–686.Google Scholar
8. Barker, A.G. and Carrotte, J.F. Influence of compressor exit conditions on combustor annular diffusers, Part II: fow redistribution, J Prop & Power, 2001, 17, pp 687–694.Google Scholar
9. Lefebvre, A.H. Gas-turbine Combustion, 2nd ed, Taylor and Francis 1999.Google Scholar
10. European Aeronautics: A vision for 2020, ACARE Report, www.acare4europe.com, 2001.Google Scholar
11. Flightpath 2050: Europe’s vision for aviation, Rep of High Level Group on Aviation Res, 2011.Google Scholar
12. Rayleigh, , The explanation of certain acoustical phenomena, Nature, 1878, 18, pp 319–320.Google Scholar
13. Lieuwen, T. and Zinn, B.T. The role of equivalence ratio oscillations in driving combustion instabilities in low NO x gas-turbines, Proc of the Combustion Institute, 1998, 27, pp 1809–1816.Google Scholar
14. Dowling, A.P. and Stow, S.R. Acoustic analysis of gas turbine combustors, AIAA J Propulsion and Power, 2003, 19, pp 751–764.Google Scholar
15. Spencer, A. and McGuirk, J.J. LDA measurements of feed annulus effects on combustor liner port flows, ASME J Fluids Eng, 2001, 123, pp 219–228.Google Scholar
16. McGuirk, J.J. and Spencer, A. Coupled & uncoupled CFD prediction of the characteristics of jets from combustor air admission ports, J Eng for Gas Turb & Power, 2001, 123, pp 327–332.Google Scholar
17. Midgley, K, Spencer, A. and McGuirk, J.J. Unsteady flow structures in radial swirler fed fuel injectors, ASME J Eng for Gas Turbines and Power, 2005, 127, pp 755–764.Google Scholar
18. Spencer, A., McGuirk, J.J. and Midgley, K. Vortex breakdown in swirling fuel injector flows, ASME J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2008, 130, pp 021503-1-8.Google Scholar
19. Cheng, L., Dianat, M., Spencer, A. and McGuirk, J.J. Validation of LES predictions of scalar mixing in high swirl fuel injector flows, Flow Turbulence and Combustion, 2012, 88, pp 146–168.Google Scholar
20. Denman, P.A. Aerodynamic evaluation of a double annular combustion system, ASME GT-2002-30465, 2002.Google Scholar
21. Ferzinger, J. and Peric, M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, Germany 1999.Google Scholar
22. Anand, M.S., Zhu, J., Connor, C. and Razdan, M.K. Combustor flow analysis using an advanced finite-volume design system, ASME 99-GT-273, 1999.Google Scholar
23. Malecki, R.E. and Rhie, C.M. McKinney, R.G., Ouyang, H., Syed, S.A., Colket, M.B. and Madabushi, R.V. Application of an advanced CFD-based analysis system to the PW6000 Combustor to optimise exit temperature distribution – Part I: Description and validation of the analysis tool, ASME 2001-GT-62, 2001.Google Scholar
24. Poinsot, T. and Veynante, D. Theoretical & Numerical Combustion, RT Edwards, North Yorkshire, 2005.Google Scholar
25. Selle, L., Lartigue, G., Poinsot, T., Koch, R. Schildmacher, K-U., Krebs, W., Prade, B., Kaufmann, P., and Veynante, D. Compressible Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent combustion in complex geometry on unstructured meshes, Combustion and Flame, 2004, 137, pp 489–505.Google Scholar
26. Menon, S. and Patel, N. Sub-Grid modelling for simulation of spray combustion in large-scale combustors, AIAA J, 2006, 44, pp 709–723.Google Scholar
27. Choi, D. and Merkle, C.L. Application of time iterative schemes to incompressible flow, AIAA J, 1985, 23, pp 1518–1524.Google Scholar
28. Choi, D. and Merkle, C.L. The application of pre-conditioning in viscous fows, J Comp Phys, 1993, 105, pp 207–223.Google Scholar
29. Acharya, S., Baliga, B.R., Karki, K., Murthy, J.Y., Prakash, C. and Vanka, S.P. Pressure-based finite-volume methods in CFD, J Heat Transfer, 2007, 129, pp 407–424.Google Scholar
30. Karki, K.C. and Patankar, S.V. Pressure-based calculation procedure for viscous flows at all speeds in arbitrary configurations, AIAA J, 1989, 27, pp 1167–1173.Google Scholar
31. McGuirk, J.J. and Page, G.J. Shock capturing using a pressure-correction method, AIAA J, 1990, 27, pp 1751–1757.Google Scholar
32. Gunasekaran, B. and McGuirk, J.J. Mildly-compressible pressure-based CFD methodology for acoustic propagation and absorption prediction, ASME GT2011-45316, 2011.Google Scholar
33. Pope, S.B. Turbulent Flow, Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
34. Walker, A.D., Carrotte, J.F., Peacock, G.L., Spencer, A. and McGuirk, J.J. Experimental study of the unsteady aerodynamics at the compressor/combustor interface of a lean burn combustion system, AIAA 2013-3603 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, San Jose, California, USA, July 2013.Google Scholar
35. Spencer, A. and Adumitroaie, V. Large Eddy Simulation of impinging jets in a cross-flow, ASME GT2003-38756, 2003.Google Scholar
36. Sagaut, P., Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, 2nd ed, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2002.Google Scholar
37. Menzies, K. Rolls-Royce, Personal Communication, 2013.Google Scholar
38. Walker, A.D., Carrotte, J.F. and McGuirk, J.J. Compressor/diffuser/combustor aerodynamic interactions in lean module combustors, ASME J Eng for Gas Turbines and Power, 2008, 130, pp 011504–01-011504-08.Google Scholar
39. Walker, A.D., Carrotte, J.F. and McGuirk, J.J. The influence of dump gap on external combustor aerodynamics at high fuel injector flow rates, ASME J Eng For Gas Turbines and Power, 2009, 131, pp 031506–01-031506-10.Google Scholar
40. Barker, A.G., Carrotte, J.F., Luff, J. and McGuirk, J.J. 2003, Design of an Integrated OGV/Diffuser System, EU FP5 project LOPOCOTEP Final Report No.GRD1-2000-25062, 2003.Google Scholar
41. Walker, A.D. Carrotte, J.F. and McGuirk, J.J. Enhanced external aerodynamic performance of a generic combustor using an integrated OGV/pre-diffuser technique, ASME J Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2007, 129, pp 80–87.Google Scholar
42. Zierer, T. Experimental investigation of the flow in diffusers behind an axial flow compressor, ASME 93-GT-347, 1993.Google Scholar
43. Carrotte, J.F., Young, K.F. and Stevens, S.J. Measurements of the flowfield within a compressor outlet guide vane passage, ASME J Turbomachinery, 1995, 117, pp 29–37.Google Scholar
44. Howard, J.H.G., Henseler, H.J. and Thornton-Trump, A.B. Performance and flow regimes for annular diffusers, ASME 67-WA/FE-21, 1967.Google Scholar
45. Midgley, K., Dianat, M., Spencer, A., Yang, Z. and McGuirk, J.J. Scalar measurements and unsteady simulations in high swirl confned flows, Proc of 9th International Gas Turbine Conference, Tokyo, Japan, December 2007.Google Scholar
46. Dunham, D., Spencer, A., McGuirk, J.J. and Dianat, M. Comparison of unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes and Large Eddy Simulation CFD Methodologies for air swirl fuel injectors, ASME J Eng For Gas Turbines & Power, 2009, 131, pp 011502–1-015502-8.Google Scholar
47. Dianat, M., McGuirk, J.J., Fokeer, S. and Spencer, A. LES of unsteady vortex aerodynamics in complex geometry gas-turbine fuel injectors, Proc. of ETMM10, Spain, 2014.Google Scholar
48. Fokeer, S. and Spencer, A. PIV measurements for Trent rich burn fuel injectors, Loughborough University, Department of Aero & Auto Eng Internal Report TT08R03, 2008.Google Scholar
49. Jeong, J. and Hussein, F. On the Identification of a Vortex, J Fluid Mech, 1995, 285, pp 69–94.Google Scholar
50. Rupp, J., Carrotte, J.F. and Spencer, A. Interaction between the acoustic pressure fuctuations and the unsteady flow-field through circular holes, ASME J Eng For Gas Turbines & Power, 132, 2010, pp 06150–01 to 06150-09.Google Scholar
51. Su, J., Rupp, J., Garmory, A. and Carrotte, J.F. Measurements and CFD predictions of the acoustic impedance of plenum-fed orifces, J Sound and Vibration, submitted 2014.Google Scholar
52. Apte, S.V., Gorokhovski, M. and Moin, P. LES of atomizing spray with stochastic modelling of secondary breakup, Int J Multiphase Flow, 2003, 29, pp 1503–1522.Google Scholar
53. Xiao, F., Dianat, M. and McGuirk, J.J. Large Eddy Simulation of liquid jet primary breakup in air crossflow, AIAA J, 2013, 51, pp 2878–2893.Google Scholar
54. Elshamy, O.M., Experimental investigations of steady and dynamic behavior of transverse liquid jets, PhD Thesis, University of Cincinnati, USA, 2007.Google Scholar
55. Ford, C.L. Novel Lean Burn Injector Designs For Improved Flow Uniformity, PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, 2013.Google Scholar
56. Wilfert, G., Sieber, J., Rolt, A., Baker, A. Touyeras, A. and Colantuoni, S. New Environmentally Friendly Aero Engine core Concepts(NEWACC), ISABE 2007-1120, 2007.Google Scholar
57. Bock, S., Horn, W. and Sieber, J. Active Core – a key technology for more environmentally friendly engines being investigated under the NEWACC program, 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), 2008.Google Scholar
58. Jones, S.M. and Paxson, D.E. Potential benefits to commercial propulsion systems from pressure gain combustion, AIAA-2013-3623, 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2013.Google Scholar
59. Winterberger, E. and Shepherd, J.E. Introduction to – To the question of energy use of detonation combustion by Ya Zel’dovich, AIAA J Prop & Power, 2006, 22, pp 586–592.Google Scholar
60. Offord, T., Miller, R.J., Dawson, J.A., Heffer, J.J.H., Mason, S. and Taylor, M. Improving the performance of a valveless pulse combustor using unsteady fuel injection, AIAA 2008-120, 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2008.Google Scholar
61. Fernelius, M., Gorrell, S., Hoke, J. and Schauer, F. Effect of periodic pressure pulses on axial turbine performance, AIAA 2013-3687, 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2013.Google Scholar
62. Ward, C.M. and Miller, R.J. Performance analysis of an ejector enhanced pressure gain combustion gas turbine, AIAA 2012-0772, 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2013.Google Scholar