Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:30:17.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Aircraft in Forest Inventories in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

L. Sayn-Wittgenstein*
Affiliation:
Research Officer, Forest Inventories Section, Forest Research Branch, Department of Forestry, Ottawa

Extract

The task of completing an inventory of Canada's forests is an immense one and it is not surprising that aircraft have been used in Canadian forest inventories ever since they became available in reasonable numbers. As will be seen, the nature of the forest to be surveyed and the characteristics of the organisations engaged in forest inventories provide the strongest argument in favour of aircraft.

Canadian forest inventories, like all forest inventories, are concerned with estimating the area of forest land and the description of the timber on that area. More specifically, one usually seeks an estimate of timber volume by tree species and size classes and information on various characteristics of tree quality, such as extent of decay and tree form.

Type
All-day symposium on agricultural aviation
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.ANON. The Air Board, Ottawa, Canada. General Progress Report. 1921.Google Scholar
2.Hales, B. J.Forests and trees. Macmillan. 1925.Google Scholar
3.Francis, D. A.The Use of Aerial Photographs in Tropical Forests. Unasylva Vol. 11, No. 3, 1957.Google Scholar
4.Fraser, D. G.Forest Fire Control Aircraft in Canada. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 68, August 1964.Google Scholar
5.Gardiner, L. M. and Prielipp, D. O.Aerial Survey of Dying Balsam Fir in Northern Ontario Using an Operation Recorder. Forestry Chronicle, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1964.Google Scholar