Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T13:09:29.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unsteady effects of camber on the aerodynamic characteristics of a thin aerofoil moving near the ground

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. F. Zedan  and
A. O. Nuhait
M. F. Zedan
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
A. O. Nuhait
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of camber on the aerodynamic characteristics of an infinitely thin aerofoil approaching the ground is studied using a numerical model that accounts for the unsteady nature of the flow. The wake is computed as a part of the solution and the image technique is used to account for ground effects. The results indicate that relative deviations of lift and moment coefficients, from corresponding values far from ground, decrease as the camber ratio or angle of attack increases. Moving the location of maximum camber backward has a similar effect. Meanlines of NACA 4-digit series showed smaller deviations compared to NACA 6-digit series meanlines. Increasing camber ratio or moving maximum camber backward causes the wake trajectory to be lower. The steady ground-effect approach is inaccurate and may give erroneous results for plates with high camber ratios at small angles of attack, especially near the ground.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 96 , Issue 959 , November 1992 , pp. 343 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nuhait, A. and Zedan, M. Numerical simulation of unsteady flow induced by a flat plate moving near ground, accepted for publication in the J. Aircra, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Wieselsberger, C. Wing resistance near the ground, NACA TM-77, 1922.Google Scholar
3. Roshenhead, L. The lift on a flat plate between parallel walls, Proc R Soc, 1931, A132, pp 127–152.Google Scholar
4. Tomotika, S., Nagamiya, T. and Takenouti, Y. The Lift On a Flat Plate Placed Near a Plane Wall, With Special Reference To The Effect of The Ground Upon the Lift of a Monoplane Aerofoil, Aeron Res Inst, Tokyo Imperial Univ, Report No 97, Aug 1933, as reported in PISTOLESI.Google Scholar
5. Pistolesi, E. Ground effect-theory and practice, NACA TM-828, 1935.Google Scholar
6. Havelock, T.H. The lift and moment on a flat plate in a stream of finite width, Proc R Soc, 1938, A166, pp 178–196.Google Scholar
7. Green, A.E. The forces acting on the circular-arc aerofoil in a stream bounded by a plane wall, Proc London Math Soc, 1940, 46, pp 19–54.Google Scholar
8. Green, A.E. The two-dimensional aerofoil in a bounded stream, Q J Maths, 1947,18, pp 167–177.Google Scholar
9. Tomotika, S., Hasimoto, Z. and Urano, K. The forces acting on aerofoil of approximate joukowski type in a stream bounded by a plane wall, Q J Mech Appl Math, 1951, 4, pp 289–307.Google Scholar
10. Tomotika, S., Tamada, K. and Umemoto, H. The lift and moment acting on a circular-arc aerofoil in a stream bounded by a plane wall, Q J Mech Appl Math, 1951, 4, pp 1– 22.Google Scholar
11. Chen, Y-. S. and Schweikhard, W.G. Dynamic ground effects on a two-dimensional flat plate, J Aircra, July 1985, 22, pp 638–640.Google Scholar
12. Katz, J. Calculation of the aerodynamic forces on automotive lifting surfaces J FluidEng, December 1985, 107, pp 438–443.Google Scholar
13. Chang, R.C. An Experimental Investigation of Dynamic Ground Effect, PhD Dissertation, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, April 1985.Google Scholar
14. Chang, R.C. and Muirhead, V.U. Investigation of dynamic ground effect, NASA CP-2462, Proc of 1985 NASA Ground Effects Workshop.Google Scholar
15. Chang, R.C. and Muirhead, V.U. Effect of sink rate on ground effect of low-aspect-ratio wings J Aircra, March 1987, 24, pp 176– 180.Google Scholar
16. Nuhait, A.O. Numerical Simulation of Feedback Control of Aerodynamic Configurations in Steady and Unsteady Ground Effects, PhD Dissertation, Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksberg, Virginia, October 1988.Google Scholar
17. Nuhait, A.O. and Mook, D.T. Numerical simulation of wings in steady and unsteady ground effects J Aircra, December 1989, 26, pp 1081–1089.Google Scholar
18. Mook, D.T. and Nuhait, A.O. Simulation of the interaction between aerodynamics and vehicle dynamics in general unsteady ground effect, AIAA-89-1489, Intersociety Advanced Marine Vehicles Conference, June, 5-8, 1989, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
19. Mook, D.T., Roy, S., Choksi, G. and Dong, B. Numerical simulation of the unsteady wake behind an aerofoil, J Aircra, June 1989, 26, (6), pp 509–514.Google Scholar