Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:07:00.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

System analysis of turbo-electric and hybrid-electric propulsion systems on a regional aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

Hendrik Gesell
Affiliation:
German Aerospace Center (DLR)Institute of Propulsion Technology Linder Hoehe, 51147 Cologne, Germany
Florian Wolters*
Affiliation:
German Aerospace Center (DLR)Institute of Propulsion Technology Linder Hoehe, 51147 Cologne, Germany
Martin Plohr
Affiliation:
German Aerospace Center (DLR)Institute of Propulsion Technology Linder Hoehe, 51147 Cologne, Germany

Abstract

The increasing environmental requirements in the air transport sector pose great challenges to the aviation industry and are key drivers for innovation. Besides various approaches for increasing the efficiency of conventional gas turbine engines, electric propulsion systems have moved into the focus of aviation research. The first electric concepts are already in service in general aviation. This study analyses the potentials of electric and turbo hybrid propulsion systems for commercial aviation. Its purpose is to compare various architectures of electrical powertrains with a conventional turboprop on a regional aircraft, similar to the ATR 72, on engine and flight mission levels. The considered architectures include a turbo-electric (power controlled and direct driven), hybrid-electric (serial and parallel) and a pure electric concept. Their system weights are determined using today’s technology assumptions. With the help of performance models and flight mission calculations the impact on fuel consumption, CO ${}_{2}$ emissions and aircraft performance is evaluated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

European Commission, Flightpath 2050, Luxembourg, 2011.Google Scholar
Hepperle, M. Electric Flight - Potential and Limitations, STO-MP-AVT-209, 2012.Google Scholar
Trimble, S. Volts from the blue, Flight International, 2017.Google Scholar
Martini, F. Electric motor sets two speed records, Siemens AG, 2017, München.Google Scholar
Becker, R.G. Development of a Gas Turbine Performance Code and its Application to Preliminary Engine Design, DLRK, 2011, Bremen, Germany.Google Scholar
van der Geest, M. Power density limits and design trends of high-speed permanent magnet synchronous machines, IEEE Trans Transport Electrif, 2015, 1, (3), pp 266276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, N. Wo bleibt die Superbatterie?, 2016, Ilmenau.Google Scholar
Erickson, R., Maksimovic, D. and Afridi, K. A Disruptive Approach to Electric Vehicle Power Electronics, Department of Electrical, Computer, und Energy Engineering, University of Colorado, 2015, Boulder.Google Scholar
Casady, J. 88 Kilowatt Automotive Inverter with New 900 Volt Silicon Carbide MOSFET Technology, United States: Cree Inc., 2015.Google Scholar
Matlok, S. Bidirectional Full SiC 200 kW DC-DC Converter, Erlangen, Deutschland: Fraunhofer IISB, 2015.Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Gunston, B. IHS Jane’s Aero-Engines, London, United Kingdom: Jane’s Information Group, 2014.Google Scholar
Hosking, E., Kenny, D.P., McCormick, R.I., Moustapha, S.H., Sampath, P. and Smailys, A.A. The PWlOO engine: 20 years of gas turbine technology evolution, RTO AVT Symposium, 1998.Google Scholar
Avions de Transport Regional, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.atraircraft.com/products_app/media/pdf/FAMILY_septembre2014.pdf. [Accessed 06 09 2017].Google Scholar
European Aviation Safety Agency, Type certificate data sheet IM.E.041, 2014.Google Scholar
FOI Swedish Defence Research Agency, Turboprop emissions database, 2017.Google Scholar
Petroleum quality information system (PQIS) and defense logistics agency (DLA), Petroleum Quality Information System 2013 Annual Report, 2013.Google Scholar
AG Energiebilanzen E.V., Ausgewählte Effizienzindikatoren zur Energiebilanz Deutschland, 2015.Google Scholar
Novelli, P. Sustainable way for alternative fuels and energy in aviation, European Comission, 2011.Google Scholar
Sutkus, D.J. Commercial aircraft emission scenario for 2020: Database development and analysis, NASA/CR-2003-21331, 2003.Google Scholar
Wolters, F., Becker, R.G. and Schaefer, M. Impact of alternative fuels on engine performance and CO2 emissions, 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), Brisbane, Australia, 2012.Google Scholar
Icha, P. and Kuhs, G. Entwicklung der Spezifischen Kohlendioxid-Emissionen des Deutschen Strommix in den Jahren 1990 bis 2015, Umweltbundesamt, 2016, Dessau-Roßlau.Google Scholar