Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:24:32.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supersonic flow simulation for a boat-tailed heat shield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Sharad C. Purohit*
Affiliation:
Applied Mathematics Division, Flight Dynamics Group, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum, India

Summary

For a 15° boat-tailed heat shield or payload shroud, the unsteady, compressible Navier-Stokes equations are numerically solved. For a Reynolds number of the order of one million and for four different freestream Mach numbers, the time integration is performed for 64 x 30 grid computational domain. The entire flow-field is analysed to delineate the gross dominant characteristics. It is observed that the flow in the boat-tail region is completely attached for Mach number 2·47 and beyond whereas it is separated for lower Mach numbers. A comparison between the numerical solutions and the available experimental results is provided and, for incipient flow separation conditions, an evaluation of unsteady surface pressure data is presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1987 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hancock, G. J. Aerodynamics — the role of the computer. The Aeronautical Journal, August 1985, 269.Google Scholar
2. Pearcy, H. Osbern, J. and Haines, A. B. The shock interaction between local effects at the shock and rear separation, AGARD-CP-35, 1968.Google Scholar
3. Ericsson, L. E. and Reding, J. P. Fluid dynamics of unsteady separated flow. Part I, Bodies of revolution. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1986, 23, 1.Google Scholar
4. Karamcheti, K. Airframe and Aerofoil noise, — Panel discussion, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1976, 45. 441.Google Scholar
5. Purohit, S. C. Navier-Stokes solution for a bulbous payload shroud, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1986.Google Scholar
6. Ahmed, S. Flow visualisation studies at transonic speeds on heat shield configuration, NAL-TWT-1-36, 1984.Google Scholar
7. Purohit, S. C. Analysis of unsteady pressure data for bulbous heat shield, VSSC:ADDG:PSLV:26:85, 1985.Google Scholar
8. Shang, J. S. An assessment of numerical solutions of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, Journal of Aircraft, 1985, 22, 353.Google Scholar
9. Baldwin, B. S. and Lomax, H. Thin layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows, AIAA Paper 78-257, January 1978.Google Scholar
10. Purohit, S. C., Shang, J. S. and Hankey, W. L. Jr. Effect of suction on the wake structure of a three-dimensional turret, AIAA Paper 83-1738, July 1983.Google Scholar
11. Rizzetta, D. P. and Shang, J. S. Numerical simulation of leading edge vortex flows, AIAA Journal, February 1986, 24, 237.Google Scholar
12. Prasad, J. K., Varambally, B. S., Pillai, N. M. and Sivaramakrishnan, A. E. Aerodynamic load on PSLV heat shield obtained through static pressure measurement on l/80th scale model on 0·3 m tunnel of NAL, ADDG: EWTT:PSLV:2:84, June 1984.Google Scholar
13. Purohit, S. C. A numerical grid generation technique for flow field simulation. Proceedings — National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, December 1984, 1.Google Scholar
14. MacCormack, R. W. and Baldwin, B. S. A numerical method for solving the Navier-Stokes equations with application to shock-boundary layer interactions. AIAA Paper 75-1, January 1975.Google Scholar
15. Purohit, S. C., Shang, J. S. and Hankey, W. L. Jr. Numerical simulation of flow around a three-dimensional turret, AIAA Journal, November 1983, 21, 1533.Google Scholar
16. Singh, K. P. Computation of supersonic flow past a multistage rocket at zero angle of attack VSSC-TR-08, December 1975.Google Scholar
17. Settles, G. S., Gilbert, R. B. and Bogdonoff, S. M. Data compilation for shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction experiments on two-dimensional compression corners, MAE-1489, August 1980.Google Scholar