Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:14:34.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A summary of measurements of steady and oscillatory pressures on a rectangular wing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. G. Mabey ,
B. L. Welsh  and
C. R. Pyne
D. G. Mabey
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment, Bedford
B. L. Welsh
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment, Bedford
C. R. Pyne
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment, Bedford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper describes a series of steady and time-dependent pressure measurements on a half-model of a rectangular wing of aspect ratio 4. The wing was mounted on a half-body attached to a sidewall of the RAE 8 x 8 ft wind tunnel and the tests were made at Mach numbers of 0·20, 0·42, 0·70, 0·80 and 0·85 with fixed transition and a Reynolds number of about 2·5 x 106 at the highest Mach number. The wing was oscillated about its mid-chord axis at four frequencies giving frequency parameters up to 1·15 at M = 0·20 and 0·25 at M = 0·85. The static angle of incidence was varied from –10° to + 10°.

Selected mean and oscillatory measurements are offered as a challenge to computational fluid dynamicists for this simple three-dimensional configuration. Comparisons are made with calculations by means of subsonic linearised theory and recent transonic small perturbation methods. The measurements are of particular interest at transonic speeds, where both attached and incipient separated flows are considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 92 , Issue 911 , January 1988 , pp. 10 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bland, S. R. AGARD three-dimensional aeroelastic configurations. AGARD AR-167, 1982.Google Scholar
2. Lambourne, N. C. Compendium of unsteady aerodynamic measurements. AGARD Report 702, 1982 and Addendum No 1, 1985.Google Scholar
3. Garner, H. C. Theoretical use of variable porosity in slotted tunnels for minimising wall interference in dynamic measurements. R & M 3706, 1971.Google Scholar
4. Winter, K. G. and Gaudet, L. Turbulent boundary layer studies at high Reynolds numbers at Mach numbers between 0.2 and 2.8. R&M 3712, 1970.Google Scholar
5. Mabey, D. G. A review of experimental research in time-dependent aerodynamics. RAE Technical Memorandum Aero 2002, 1984.Google Scholar
6. Purslow, D. The application of composites fractography to the investigation of the failure of a wind tunnel model. RAE Technical Report 83020, 1983.Google Scholar
7. Pyne, C. R. and Drew, W. Distortion modes of dynamically excited wind tunnel models using a real-time Moiré fringe technique. 5th International Model Analysis Conference, April 1987.Google Scholar
8. Welsh, B. L. A method to improve the temperature stability of semi-conductor strain gauge pressure transducers. RAE Technical Report 77155, 1977.Google Scholar
9. Pearcey, H. H. and Holder, D. W. Simple methods for the prediction of wing buffeting resulting from bubble type separations. ARC 23884 (NPL Aero Report 1024), 1962.Google Scholar
10. Welsh, B. L. and Mcowat, D. M. Presto: a system for the measurement and analysis of time-dependent signals. RAE Technical Report 79135, 1979.Google Scholar
11. Welsh, B. L. Recent developments in the measurement of time-dependent pressures. AGARD CP-348, Paper 35, 1983.Google Scholar
12. Stott, G., Pyne, C. R. and McOwat, D. M. An hydraulic actuation system for the excitation of wind tunnel models. RAE Technical Report 85037, 1985.Google Scholar
13. Mabey, D. G. and Welsh, B. L. The measurement of oscillatory pressures with discrete and sweep excitation. J Fluids Struct, 1987, 1, 95–105.Google Scholar
14. Mabey, D. G., Welsh, B. L. and Pyne, C. R. Measurements of steady and oscillatory pressures on a rectangular wing. RAE Technical Report 86040, 1986.Google Scholar
15. Mabey, D. G. Beyond the buffet boundary. Aeronaut J, 1973, 77, (748), 201–215.Google Scholar
16. Mabey, D. G., Welsh, B. L., Stott, G., and Cripps, B. E. The dynamic characteristics of rapidly moving spoilers at subsonic and transonic speeds. RAE Technical Report 82109, 1982.Google Scholar
17. Mabey, D. G. Flow unsteadiness and model vibration in wind tunnels at subsonic and transonic speeds. ARC CP 1155, 1971.Google Scholar
18. Tijdeman, H. Investigations of the transonic flow around oscillatory aerofoils. NLR TR 77-090U, 1977.Google Scholar
19. Dowell, E. H., Williams, M. H. and Chi, M. R. An assessment of theoretical models for viscous and transonic flow. AGARD CP 296, Paper 1, 1980.Google Scholar
20. Davies, D. E. Theoretical determination of subsonic oscillatory airforce coefficients. RAE Technical Report 76059, R & M 3804, 1976.Google Scholar
21. Davies, D. E. On the use of Fortran programs for evaluating the generalised airforces and aerodynamic loading on a flat plate wing oscillating harmonically in subsonic flow. RAE Technical Memorandum Structures 881, 1976.Google Scholar
22. Satyanarayan, B. and Davis, S. Experimental studies of unsteady trailing edge conditions. AlAA J, 1978, 16, (2), 125–129.Google Scholar
23. Goorjian, P. M. Private communication, 30 August 1985.Google Scholar
24. Watson, M. Private communication, 2 December 1985.Google Scholar
25. Mabey, D. G., Welsh, B. L. and Cripps, B. E. Measurements of steady and oscillatory pressures on a low aspect ratio model at subsonic and supersonic speeds. RAE Technical Report 84095, 1984.Google Scholar
26. Mabey, D. G. and Welsh, B. L. Measurements and calculations of steady and oscillatory pressures on a low aspect ratio model at subsonic and transonic speeds. J Fluids Struct, 1987, 1, 445–468.Google Scholar
27. Garner, H. C. Further appraisal of a semi-empirical method for oscillatory pressure distributions in supercritical flow. RAE Technical Memorandum Aero 1969, 1983.Google Scholar