Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:09:07.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separation control on highly-swept wings with fixed or variable camber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P. R. Ashill ,
G. L. Riddle  and
M. J. Stanley
P. R. Ashill
Affiliation:
DRA Bedford, UK
G. L. Riddle
Affiliation:
DRA Bedford, UK
M. J. Stanley
Affiliation:
DRA Bedford, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes an experimental investigation into the effect of miniature vortex generators (VGs) on the longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of a highly-swept wing with drooped leading edges. The experiments were performed in a low-speed windtunnel on a wing of the same delta planform as that used in a previous study. The latter wing was of fixed camber, while the subject of the present study was a wing with three different leading edge droop angles. The maximum reduction in drag due to the VGs was found to be about half that for the fixed-camber wing. This is reconciled with the different behaviour of the flow on the upper surface for the two types of wing. Without control, the drag of the variable-droop wings is much lower than that of the fixed-camber wing. As a result, with control, the variable droop wings have lower drag than that of the fixed-camber wing. Compared to that of the variable-droop wings without control, the fixed-camber wing, with control, has lower lift-dependent drag for lift coefficients between 0·4 and 0·7. However, at higher lift coefficients, the reverse applies.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 99 , Issue 988 , October 1995 , pp. 317 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ashill, P.R. and Riddle, G.L. The control of leading edge separation on a cambered delta wing, AGARD-CP-548, pp 11-1 - 11-13, March 1994.Google Scholar
2. Ashill, P.R, Riddle, G.L. and Stanley, M.J. Control of three- dimensional separation on highly-swept wings, ICAS-94-4.6.2, September 1994.Google Scholar
3. Mabey, D.G. and Pyne, C.R. Tangential leading edge blowing on a combat aircraft configuration, ICAS-94-4.6.1, September 1994.Google Scholar
4. Pearcey, H.H. Shock-induced separation and its prevention by design and boundary-layer control, In: Boundary Layer and Flow Control, Its Principles and Application, Vol 2, Lachmann, G.V. (Ed) Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
5. Freestone, M.M. Vortex generators for control of shock-induced separation, Part 1: Introduction and aerodynamics, ESDU Transonic Data Memorandum 93024, December 1993.Google Scholar
6. Wendt, B.J. Greber, I. and HINGST, W.R. The structure and development of streamwise vortex arrays embedded in a turbulent boundary layer, NASA Tech Memo 105211, 1991.Google Scholar
7. Stratford, B.S. Flow in the laminar layer near separation, ARC R&M 2002, 1954.Google Scholar
8. Rosenhead, L. (Ed) Laminar boundary layers, Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
9. Ashill, P.R. and Smith, P.D. An integral method for calculating the effects on turbulent boundary layer development of sweep and taper, Aeronaut J, February 1985, 89, (882), pp 43–45.Google Scholar