Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:12:34.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Satellite attitude slew manoeuvres using inverse control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

C.R. Mclnnes*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Inverse dynamics is investigated as an efficient means of generating large angle satellite attitude slew manoeuvres. The required slew manoeuvres are specified using high order polynomials which result in a smooth control torque profile. Such smooth torque profiles are of importance in avoiding excitation of elastic modes of the satellite structure. In addition, the polynomial functions may be used to define a slew trajectory between arbitrary initial and final states allowing track-to-track manoeuvres. To compensate for uncertainties in the satellite dynamics, the inverse control is extended to include feedback linearisation about the nominal reference trajectory. It is shown that for rest-to-rest slew manoeuvres the resulting composite control is robust to uncertainties in the satellite inertia matrix and to actuator degradation. In addition, it is shown that complex paths may be generated through the use of high order polynomial functions which contain all the information required to enforce user defined constraints and boundary conditions in a compact, computationally efficient form.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mckerrow, P.J. Introduction to Robotics, Addison-Wesley, Sydney, 1991.Google Scholar
2. Lane, S.H. and Stencel, R.F. Flight control using nonlinear inverse dynamics, Automatica, 1988, 24, (4), pp 471483.Google Scholar
3. Thomson, D.G. and Bradley, R. Development and verification of an algorithm for helicopter inverse simulation, Vertica,1990, 14, (2), pp 185200.Google Scholar
4. Scrivener, S.L. and Thompson, R.C. Survey of time-optimal attitude manoeuvres, J Guid Contr Dynamics, 1994, 17, (2), pp 225232.Google Scholar
5. Lo, S. and Chen, Y. Smooth sliding-mode control for spacecraft attitude tracking manoeuvres, J Guid Contr Dynamics, 1995, 18, (6), pp 13451349.Google Scholar
6. Wie, B. and Barba, P.M. Quaternion feedback for spacecraft large angle manoeuvres, J Guid Contr Dynamics, 1985, 8, (3), pp 360365.Google Scholar
7. Mcinnes, C.R. Large angle attitude manoeuvres with autonomous sun vector avoidance, J Guid Contr Dynamics, 1994, 17, (4), pp 875877.Google Scholar
8. Schaub, H., Junkins, J.L. and Robinett, R.D. Globally stable feedback laws for near-minimum fuel and near minimum-time manoeuvers for a landmark-tracking spacecraft, AAS 95-417, AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 14-17 August 1995.Google Scholar
9. Burden, R.L. and Faires, J.D. Numerical Analysis, 6th Edition, Brooks/Cole Publishing, California, 1997.Google Scholar