Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:11:44.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reducing speed commands in interval management with speed planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

T. Riedel Open the ORCID record for T. Riedel [Opens in a new window] ,
M. Takahashi  and
E. Itoh
T. Riedel*
Affiliation:
Keio University, Graduate School of Science and Technology Yokohama Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Air Traffic Management Department TokyoJapan
M. Takahashi
Affiliation:
Keio University, Graduate School of Science and Technology YokohamaJapan
E. Itoh
Affiliation:
Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Air Traffic Management Department TokyoJapan
*
[email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Flight-deck Interval Management (FIM) is a modern airborne self-spacing technology that improves arrival route throughput and runway utilisation and increases hourly arrival capacity by up to four aircraft per hour and per runway, compared to conventional air traffic controller guided arrivals. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has been the leader in FIM research and formulated a logic that was put to an actual flight test in 2017. Despite the overall success of the project, operational deficiencies concerning the number of speed commands, which led to several recommendations for future research before operational implementation, were discovered. In this study, a new logic that implements a two-stage rule-based selection algorithm was developed to overcome those deficiencies. The proposed logic was compared to NASA’s logic on an arrival in Tokyo International Airport with multiple induced error patterns. The results indicate that the new logic significantly decreases the number of speed commands with only minor aggravations in spacing performance. The results that highlight the strengths and weaknesses of both concepts are discussed, and an outlook on and ideas for future research on FIM and the proposed logic are presented.

Keywords

Air Traffic ManagementInterval ManagementControl LogicHuman Factors
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 124 , Issue 1272 , February 2020 , pp. 189 - 215
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

JADC, Worldwide Market Forecast 2018–2037. http://www.jadc.jp/files/topics/140_ext_01_en_0.pdf, 2018 [Accessed 31 March 2019].Google Scholar
ICAO, Doc 9750-AN/963, 2016-2030 Global Air Navigation Plan. https://www.icao.int/airnavigation/Documents/GANP-2016-interactive.pdf, 2016 [Accessed 31 March 2019].Google Scholar
FAA, NextGen Implementation Plan 2016. https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/media/NextGen_Implementation_Plan-2016.pdf, 2016 [Accessed 31 March 2019].Google Scholar
SESAR, European ATM Master Plan 2015 Edition. https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/downloads/202, 2015 [Accessed 31 March 2019].Google Scholar
Study Group for the Future Air Traffic Systems, Long-term Vision for the Future Air Traffic Systems CARATS, Collaborative Actions for Renovations of Air Traffic Systems. https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/000128185.pdf, 2010 [Accessed 31 March 2019]Google Scholar
Baxley, B.T., Johnson, W.C., Scardina, J. and Shay, R.F., Air Traffic Management Technology Demonstration-1 Concept of Operations (ATD-1 ConOps), Version 3.0, NASA/TM-2016-219213, 2016.Google Scholar
Bone, R.S. and Mendolia, A.S., Pilot and Air Traffic Controller Use of Interval Management During Terminal Metering Operations, MITRE Technical Report MTR170570, 2018.Google Scholar
Abbott, T.S., An Overview of a Trajectory-Based Solution for En Route and Terminal Area Self-Spacing: Seventh Revision, NASA/CR–2015-218794, 2015.Google Scholar
Abbott, T.S., An Overview of a Trajectory-Based Solution for En Route and Terminal Area Self-Spacing: Third Revision, NASA/CR–2014-218288, 2014.Google Scholar
RTCA, Minimal operational performance standards (MOPS) for flight-deck interval management (FIM), RTCA DO-361, 2015.Google Scholar
RTCA, Safety, Performance and Interoperability Requirements Document for Airborne Spacing – Flight Deck Interval Management (ASPA-FIM), RTCA DO-328, 2011.Google Scholar
Weitz, L.A. and Swieringa, K.A., Comparing Interval Management Control Laws for Steady-State Errors and String Stability, 2018 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Kissimmee, FL, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, X. and Weitz, L.A., Exploring a Model Predictive Control Law to Design Four-Dimensional Trajectories for Interval Management, AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace, Grapevine, TX, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussink, F.J.L., van der Laan, J.J. and de Jong, P.M.A., Combining Flight-deck Interval Management with Continuous Descent Approaches in high density traffic and realistic wind conditions, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Gelder, N., Bussink, F.J.L., Knapen, E.G. and in ‘t Veld, A.C., Interval Management Operations in the Terminal Airspace of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, San Diego, CA, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoh, E. and Uejima, K., Applying Flight-deck Interval Management based Continuous Descent Operation for Arrival Air Traffic to Tokyo International Airport, 10th ATM Seminar, Chicago, IL, 2013.Google Scholar
Itoh, E., Uejima, K., Kakichi, Y. and Suzuki, S., Modeling and Simulation Study on Airborne-based Energy Saving Arrivals to Tokyo International Airport, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-located Conferences, Boston, MA, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoh, E., Fukushima, S., Hirabayashi, H., Wickramasinghe, N.K. and Toratani, D. Evaluating energy-saving arrivals of wide-body passenger aircraft via flight-simulator experiments, J Aircraft, November 2018, 55, (6), pp 2427–2443, http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.C034348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedel, T., Itoh, E. and Takahashi, M., Investigating Aircraft Speed Control Logics for Interval Management Targeting Arrival Traffic to Tokyo International Airport, Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology, Seoul, South Korea, 2017.Google Scholar
Riedel, T., Itoh, E., Tatsukawa, T. and Takahashi, M., Preliminary Study on Interval Management for Improving Aircraft Speed Command Behavior, 55. JSASS Aircraft Symposium, Matsue-Shi, Japan, 2017.Google Scholar
Riedel, T., Takahashi, M. and Itoh, E., Conceptual Design of a Speed Command Algorithm for Airborne Spacing Interval Management, 2018 International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Castelldefels, Spain, 2018.Google Scholar
Riedel, T., A Novel Control Approach to Improve Speed Commands and Pilot Workload for Flight-deck based Interval Management, 31st Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2018.Google Scholar
Swieringa, K.A., Wilson, , Baxley, B.T., Roper, R.D., Abbott, T.S., Levitt, I. and Scharl, J. Flight test evaluation of the ATD-1 interval management application, 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, Denver, CO, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, B.T., Swieringa, K.A., Wilson, S.R., Roper, R.D., Hubbs, C., Goess, P. and Shay, R., Flight crew survey responses from the interval management (IM) avionics phase 2 flight test, 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, Denver, CO, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, B.T., Swieringa, K.A., Roper, R.D., Hubbs, C., Goess, P. and Shay, R., Recommended changes to interval management to achieve operational implementation, 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), St. Petersburg, FL, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, User manual for the base of aircraft data (BADA) Revision 3.12, EEC Technical/Scientific Report No. 14/04/24-44, 2014.Google Scholar
Japan Civil Aviation Bureau: Aeronautical Information Publication AD2-24, RJTT Charts Related to an Aerodrome, Effective: 19 July 2018.Google Scholar
Itoh, E., Wickramasinghe, N.K., Hirabayashi, H. and Fukushima, S., Feasibility study on fixed flight-path angle descent for wide-body passenger aircraft, CEAS Aeronaut J, October 2018, 10, (2), pp 589–612. doi: 10.1007/s13272-018-0337-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NATS, Aeronautical Information Circular P 001/2015, https://www.nats.aero/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/TBS-Aeronautical-Info-Circular.pdf, 2015 [Accessed 31 March 2019]Google Scholar
Baxley, B.T., Palmer, M.T. and Swieringa, K.A., Cockpit Interfaces, Displays, and Alerting Messages for the Interval Management Alternative Clearances (IMAC) Experiment, NASA/TM–2015-218775, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar