Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:32:40.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

R.101

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

V. C. Richmond
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Proceedings
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 33 , Issue 224 , August 1929 , pp. 686 - 723
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

note on page 686 1 e.g., a paper by Mr. H. R. Cox, of the Staff of the Royal Airship Works, on “The External Forces in an Airship Structure, with special reference to the requirements of Rigid Airship Design,” won the Society's R.38 Memorial Prize last year, and will be published shortly

note on page 687 2 Vide Aeronautical Research Committee's Reports & Memoranda Nos. 1168 and 1169.

note on page 687 3 Vide Aeronautical Research Committee's Reports & Memoranda No. 1044.

note on page 688 4 Vide “Some Modern Developments in Rigid Airship Construction,” V. C. Richmond, Inst, of Naval Architects, March 30th, 1928.

note on page 688 5 5 The criteria taken for fin efficiency at a given angle of yaw are :—

(Lateral force on hull and fins—Lateral force on hull alone)/ρV2 Atλ and

(Moment on hull and fins–Moment on hull alone)/ρV2 Atλ

At=Area of fins and flaps

λ=Distance of centre of area of fins from the C.B.

note on page 689 6 The scale of the models used in such experiments was:—

For R.33, 1/161.

For R.101, 1/217.26

note on page 689 7 Vide Aeronautical Research Committee's Reports & Memoranda No. 827.

note on page 690 8 See also Journal Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. XXXIII., No. 219, p. several errors in this drawing, however.

Note on page 692 9 lust, of Naval Architects Inc. cil.

Note on page 692 10 Failure to provide for this is believed to have caused the American airship Shenandoah to break away from her mooring mast.

Note on page 705 11 Flight, November 29th, 1928, p. 1020.

Aeroplane, November 29th, 1928, p. 881.

Engineering, November 30th, 1928, p. 689.

The Engineer, November 30th, 1928, p. 598.

The Engineer, December 7th, 1928, p. 622.

“Some Modern Developments in Rigid Airship Construction,” V. C. Richmond, Inst, of Naval Architects Spring Meeting, March 30th, 1928.

Note on page 706 12 Vide Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. XXX., No. 190, p. 565.

note on paeg 706 13 Inst, of Naval Architects loc. cit.

Note on page 706 14 Vide Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. XXXIIL.No. 219.

Note on page 708 15 Vide Giblett, Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. XXXI., No, 198, p. 528.