Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:09:50.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

QUACC, a novel method for predicting unsteady flows — including propellers and store release

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. L. Hunt ,
M. Childs  and
M. Maina
D. L. Hunt
Affiliation:
Aircraft Research Association (ARA) Bedford, UK
M. Childs
Affiliation:
Aircraft Research Association (ARA) Bedford, UK
M. Maina
Affiliation:
Aircraft Research Association (ARA) Bedford, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aerospace designers are increasingly interested in predicting unsteady flowfields such as those associated with store release, rotating propellers etc. However, the cost of performing fully unsteady calculations is usually prohibitively expensive. In order to address this problem for unsteady flows driven by a moving surface, a novel method is presented which calculates the time derivates as an analytic function of the instantaneous flowfield. This allows an accurate solution of the unsteady flow equations to be calculated using a quasi-unsteady approach. The validity of this approach is demonstrated for a store release and a propeller test case. Possible extensions to this method for more complex unsteady flows are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 105 , Issue 1050 , August 2001 , pp. 427 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Forsey, C.R., Maina, M. and Scrase, N. Development and validation of an Euler code for propeller flowfield prediction and thrust/drag accounting, RAeS European forum: Recent developments and applica tions in aeronautical CFD, University of Bristol, 1993.Google Scholar
2. Stokes, S, Chappell, J.A. and Leatham, M. Efficient numerical store trajectory prediction for complex aircraft/store configurations, AIAA 99-3713, 1999.Google Scholar
3. Shaw, J.A. and Peace, A.J. Simulating three-dimensional aeronautical flows on mixed block-structured/semi-structured/unstructured grids, Proceedings of the 21st Congress of 1CAS, Melbourne, Australia, 1998.Google Scholar
4. Leatham, M., Stokes, S., Shaw, J.A., Cooper, J., Appa, J. and Blaylock, T.A. Automatic mesh generation for rapid response Navier- Stokes calculations, AIAA 2000-2247, 2000.Google Scholar
5. Appa, J., Hughes, R.A., Porter, L., Woods, P.D., Hunt, D.L. and Rham, S. Generating rapid response Navier-Stokes solutions in hybrid mesh using 2-equation turbulence models, AIAA 2000-2677, 2000.Google Scholar
6. Gaitonde, A.L. A dual time method for the solution of the unsteady Euler equations, Aeronaut J, October 1994, 98, (978), pp 283–291.Google Scholar
7. Smith, W.A. and Caughey, D.A. Multi-grid solution of inviscid transonic flow through rotating blade passages, AIAA 87-608, 1987.Google Scholar
8. Strawn, R.C. and Barth, T.J. A finite-volume Euler solver for computing rotary-wing aerodynamics on unstructured meshes, J Amer Heli Sot; April 1993.Google Scholar
9. Wilcox, D.M. Turbulence Modelling for CFD, DCW Industries, 1993.Google Scholar
10. Hunt, D.L. Development and application of farfield drag extraction techniques for complex viscous flows, RAeS Aerodynamics Conference 2000, Aeronaut J, March 2001, 105 (1045), pp 161–169.Google Scholar