Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:08:51.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Present Trends in Research Towards All-Weather Landing for Civil Aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. R. Baxter
J. R. Baxter*
Affiliation:
Formerly Aeronautical Research Laboratories, Qantas Airways Ltd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Following a brief description of the basic radio aids and the terminology used, the paper discusses in some detail the differences between the original British and American approaches to all-weather landing; the different types of equipment resulting from these two approaches are broadly described. The mixing of ideas which occurred at the IATA Conference at Lucerne in 1963 and the more recent tendency towards a blending of British and American ideas are then discussed, and some predictions are made as to the form of the ultimate all-weather landing system. Certain Australian contributions to display research and the simulation of low visibility in flight are mentioned in context.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 71 , Issue 678 , June 1967 , pp. 401 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.IATA. All-weather Landing and Take-off, Part 1. Sum mary of Proceedings, Report on 15th lATA Technical Conference, April-May 1963.Google Scholar
2.ICAO. 1087th Report to Council from the Air Naviga tion Commission, Appendix A, November 1965.Google Scholar
3.Air France. An Assessment of the Percentage of Flight Irregularities Avoided by Lowering Landing Minima. 15th IATA Technical Conference, Working Paper 38, April 1963.Google Scholar
4.KLM. Effect of Lowering Landing Limits on Regularity. 15th IATA Technical Conference, Working Paper 149, April 1963.Google Scholar
5.Calvert, E. S., Sparke, J. W., Shayler, J. S. and Morrall, J. C. Safety and Regularity in Air Transport in Marginal Visibilities. RAE Tech Note Mech Eng 380, BL60, August 1963.Google Scholar
6.Winick, A. B. A Proposed Airborne System Configuration for Phase 2 and 3 Operations. 15th IATA Technical Conference, Working Paper 90, April 1963.Google Scholar
7.Knemeyer, S. and Yingling, G. The Pilot as an Active Control Element in the Automatic Control System. 15th IATA Technical Conference, Working Paper 115, April 1963.Google Scholar
8.Lane, J. C. and Cumming, R. W. The Role of Visual Cues in Final Approach to Landing. ARL Human Eng Note 1, May 1956.Google Scholar
9.Baxter, I. R. and Workman, J. D. Review of Projected Displays of Flight Information and Recommendations for Further Development. ARL Human Eng Report 2, August 1962.Google Scholar
10.Gold, T. and Workman, J. D.Research in the Application of Windshield Projection Displays to the All-Weather Landing Task. Journal of Aircraft, Vol 2, No 4, July-August 1965.Google Scholar
11.Baxter, J. R. Proposal for a Broader Research Programme on Information Displays for Approach and Landing. RAE Tech Memo BLEU 115, June 1965.Google Scholar
12.Naish, J. M.Combination of Information in Superimposed Visual Fields. Nature, Vol 202, No 4933, May 1964.Google Scholar
13.Baxter, J. R. and Cumming, R. W. Low Visibility Simulation for Pilot Training. ARL Human Eng Note 17, March 1964.Google Scholar