Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:21:41.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential fuel savings due to hybrid laminar flow control under operational conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

T. M. Young  and
J. P. Fielding
T. M. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Limerick, Ireland
J. P. Fielding
Affiliation:
College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) is an active drag reduction technique that permits extended laminar flow on an aircraft surface and thus offers the potential for significant fuel savings. This is at the expense of an increase in system weight and specific fuel consumption. An overview of HLFC system failure types and consequences is presented as an introduction to this study, which investigated the impact of a potential loss of laminar flow due to flight in cirrus clouds. At typical cruising altitudes, the ice crystals are of a sufficient size and may result in sufficient particle flux to cause a temporary transition of the boundary layer. A computer performance model of a twin engine aircraft in the class of the Boeing 757 has been used to study the impact of alternative fuel planning scenarios on the fuel consumed by a HLFC aircraft, taking into account a model of probable cloud encounter. Based on the models, the study showed that if the fuel planning assumed 25% time-in-cloud (TIC) during the cruise, then in the extreme case of 55% TIC during the cruise, the contingency fuel (taken as 3% of the trip fuel), would be sufficient for the aircraft to complete the mission (including the alternate leg and hold).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 105 , Issue 1052 , October 2001 , pp. 581 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. JAA, Joint Airworthiness Requirements OPS 1, European Joint Aviation Authorities.Google Scholar
2. Young, T.M. and Fielding, J.P. Flight operational assessment of hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) aircraft, European drag reduction conference, 19–21 June 2000, Potsdam, Germany.Google Scholar
3. Coleman, W.S. Roughness due to insects, Boundary Layer and Flow Control, Vol II, 1961, Lachmann, G.V. (Ed), Pergammon Press.Google Scholar
4. Croom, C.C. and Holmes, B.J. Insect contamination protection for laminar flow surfaces, 1986, Langley symposium on aerodynamics, Vol 1, December 1986.Google Scholar
5. Humphreys, B. Contamination avoidance for laminar flow surfaces, First European forum on laminar flow technology, March1992, Hamburg.Google Scholar
6. Hall, G.R. On the mechanics of transition produced by particles passing through an initially laminar boundary layer and estimated effect on the LFC performance of the X-21 aircraft, 1964, Northrop Corp.Google Scholar
7. Nastrom, G.D., Holderman, J.D., Davis, R.F. Cloud-encounter and particle-concentration variabilities from GASP data, NASA TP-1886, 1981.Google Scholar
8. Jasperson, W.H., Nastrom, G.D., Davis, R.E. and Holderman, J.D. GASP cloud encounter statistics: implications for laminar flow control flight, J Aircr, November 1984.Google Scholar
9. IPCC, Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, a Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 1999, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
10. Boeing, Performance Engineer General Course Notes, Volumes No 1 and 2, 1996, The Boeing Company.Google Scholar
11. Boeing, Performance Engineers Manual 7G7, undated, The Boeing Company.Google Scholar
12. Boeing, Operations Manual: Boeing 757-200, Volume III, 1993, The Boeing Company.Google Scholar
13. Boeing, Hybrid laminar flow control study: final technical report, 1992, NASA CR-165930.Google Scholar
14. Robert, J-P. Hybrid laminar flow control — a challenge for a manufacturer, 1992, First European forum on laminar flow technology, March 1992, Hamburg.Google Scholar
15. Mullender, A.J. and Riedel, H.A. Laminar flow nacelle flight test me, 1996, Second European forum on laminar flow technology, June 1996, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
16. Wilson, R.A.L. The Introduction of Laminar Flow to the Design and Optimisation of Transport Aircraft, 1997, PhD thesis, Cranfield University.Google Scholar