Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:11:00.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A method for predicting the rate and effect of approach to the stall of a microlight aeroplane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

G. B. Gratton
G. B. Gratton*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK, (formerly of the British Microlight Aircraft Association)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The stall and immediately post-stall behaviour of a microlight aeroplane are shown to be a function of the deceleration rate prior to the stall; therefore, it is necessary to use a representative deceleration rate when determining the acceptability of stall and post-stall handling qualities. This research has found means by which the range of deceleration rates likely to be seen in a particular type can be estimated, so that flight test programmes can ensure these rates are included, and thus aircraft are confirmed to have acceptable stalling characteristics. Recommendations are made towards the use of this research for all aircraft type, and of further work which might usefully be carried out.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 110 , Issue 1112 , October 2006 , pp. 683 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. British Civil Airworthiness Requirements, Section S, Small Light Aeroplanes, CAP 482, Issue 3, UK Civil Aviation Authority.Google Scholar
2. Houghton, E.L. and Carruthers, N.B., Aerodynamics for Engineering Students, Third edition.Google Scholar
3. Cherokee Warrior II Information Manual, Report VB-880, Piper Aircraft Corporation.Google Scholar
4. ACI Stall Warning entry page, homepages.which.net/∽aci.stw/.Google Scholar
5. Pratt, J.M., Cessna 152 – A Pilots Guide.Google Scholar
6. Empire Test Pilots School Course Notes, No 20, 1996, FTE Course.Google Scholar
7. British Microlight Aircraft Association, Test Schedule for three-axis performance and handling (Section S, Issue 2 compliance, Vd not exceeding 140 knots), BMAA/AW/010a.Google Scholar
8. British Microlight Aircraft Association, Test Schedule for weightshift performance and handling (Section S, Issue 2 compliance, Vd not exceeding 140 knots), BMAA/AW/010b.Google Scholar
9. Glauert, H., The Elements of Aerofoil and Airscrew Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1926, First edition.Google Scholar
10. Gratton, G.B. and Newman, S.J., The ‘tumble’ departure mode in weight shift controlled microlight aircraft, Proceedings Institution Mechanical Engineers, 217, Part G, pp 149–166.Google Scholar
11. Eshelby, M.E., Aircraft Performance, Theory and Practice.Google Scholar