Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:05:21.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Life extending controller design for reusable rocket engines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. Ray ,
M. S. Holmes  and
C. F. Lorenzo
A. Ray
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, USA
M. S. Holmes
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, USA
C. F. Lorenzo
Affiliation:
Instrumentation and Control Division, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goal of life extending control (LEC) is to enhance structural durability of complex mechanical systems, such as aircraft, spacecraft, and energy conversion devices, without incurring any significant loss of performance. This paper presents a concept of robust life-extending controller design for reusable rocket engines, similar to the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME), via damage mitigation in both fuel and oxidiser turbines while achieving the required performance for transient responses of the main combustion chamber pressure and the oxidant/fuel mixture ratio. The design procedure makes use of a combination of linear robust control synthesis and nonlinear optimisation techniques. Results of simulation experiments on the model of a reusable rocket engine are presented to this effect.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 105 , Issue 1048 , June 2001 , pp. 315 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dai, X. and Ray, A. Damage-mitigating control of a reusable rocket engine: Parts I and II, ASME J of Dyn Svs, Measur and Ctrl, 1996, 118, (3), pp 401–415.Google Scholar
2. Ray, A. and Caplin, J. Damage mitigating control of aircraft: trade-off between flight performance and structural durability, Aeronaut J, 2000, 104, (1039), pp 397–408.Google Scholar
3. Ray, A. and Dai, X. Damage-mitigating control of a reusable rocket engine, 1995, NASA Contractor Report 4640 under Lewis Research Center Grant NAG 3-1240.Google Scholar
4. Lorenzo, C.F. and Merrill, W.C. An intelligent control system for rocket engines: need, vision, and issues, Control Systems Magazine, 12, (1), 1991, pp 42–46.Google Scholar
5. Ray, A., Wu, M.K., Carpino, M. and Lorenzo, C.F. Damage-mitigating control of mechanical systems: Parts I and II, ASME J of Dyn Sys, Measur and Ctrl, 1994, 116, (3), pp 437–455.Google Scholar
6. Holmes, M. and Ray, A. Fuzzy damage mitigating control of mechanical structures, ASME J of Dyn Sys, Measur and Ctrl, 1998, 120, (2), pp 249–256.Google Scholar
7. Rozak, J.H. and Ray, A. Robust multivariable control of rotorcraft in forward flight, J of the Ameri Heli Soc, 1997, 42, (2), pp 149–160.Google Scholar
8. Rozak, J.H.,and Ray, A. Robust multivariable control of rotorcraft in forward flight: impact of bandwidth on fatigue life, J of the Ameri Heli Soc, 1998, 43, (3), pp 195–201.Google Scholar
9. Kallappa, P., Holmes, M.S. and Ray, A. Life extending control of fossil power plants for structural durability and performance enhancement, Automatica, 1997, pp 1101–1118.Google Scholar
10. Kallappa, P. and Ray, A. Fuzzy wide-range control of fossil power plants for life extension and robust performance, Automatica, 2000, 36, (1), pp 69–82.Google Scholar
11. Zhang, H. and Ray, A. Robust damage-mitigating control of mechanical structures: experimental validation on a test apparatus, ASME J of Dyn Sys, Measur and Ctrl, 1999, 121, (3), pp 377–385.Google Scholar
12. Zhou, K., Doyle, J.C. and Glover, K. Robust and Optimal Control, 1996, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
13. Bamieh, B.A. and Pearson, J.B. A general framework for linear periodic systems with applications to Hx sampled-data control, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1992, 37, (4), pp 418–435.Google Scholar
14. Sivashankar, N. and Khargonekar, P.P. Robust stability and performance analysis of sampled-data systems, IEEE Transactions on Auto matic Control, 1993, 38, (1), pp 58–69.Google Scholar
15. Balas, G.J., Doyle, J.C., Glover, K., Packard, A. and Smith, R. μ-Analysis and synthesis toolbox, MUSYN and The Math Works, 1993.Google Scholar
16. Suresh, S. Fatigue of Materials, 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
17. Newman, J.C. FASTRAN-I1 - A fatigue crack growth structural analysis program, 1992, NASA Technical Memorandum 104159, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA.Google Scholar
18. Gill, P.E., Murray, W., Saunders, M.A. and Wright, M.H. User's Guide for NPSOL (Version 4-0): A Fortran Package for Nonlinear Programming, 1986, Stanford Office of Technology Licensing, 350 Cambridge Avenue, Suite 250, Palo Alto, California 94306.Google Scholar