No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Latest on Hijacking
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2016
Extract
At a meeting of the Air Law Group on 12th May 1973, under the Chairmanship of Sir William Hildred, the Group met to hear a report from Mr. Arnold Kean of the CAA and to discuss the situation. A summary of this report and the contributions to the discussion from Sir Frederick Tymms and Professor Bin Cheng are set out below.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1973
References
1.See ICAO, Summary Report on the Work of the Legal Committee During its 20th Session (Special) (Montreal, 9th-30th January 1973), Doc 9049 LC/168, 31st January 1973.Google Scholar
2.PCIJ: B 5, p27.Google Scholar
3.In Diggs v. Schultz, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held on 31st October 1972, per McGowan, circuit Judge: “We think there can be no blinking the purpose and effect of The Byrd Amendment [to the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act]. It was to detach this country from the UN boycott of Southern Rhodesia in blatant disregard of our treaty undertakings” (11 International Legal Materials, p. 1252) For Byrd Amendments, see ibid, p 178.Google Scholar
5.Preamble, para 31; Art 37, para 2; Art 44, paras (a) and (b).Google Scholar
6.ICAO Doc LC/SC CR, 1972, WD/7.Google Scholar
7.See The Hague Convention on Hijacking of Aircraft 1970, The Aeronautical Journal, pp 529, 531, September 1972.Google Scholar
8.LC/Working Draft No 823: Comments on the Report of the ICAO Special Subcommittee on the Council Resolution of 19th June 1972.Google Scholar
11.Air Law Resolution A, para 5, of the 54th Conference of the ILA held at The Hague, August 1970. See Report of the 54th Conference of the ILA, p xi, 1971.Google Scholar
12.General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, pp 75-77, 1953.Google Scholar