Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:53:02.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Full Potential and Euler solutions for transonic unsteady flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. Ambrosi ,
L. Gasparini  and
L. Vigevano
D. Ambrosi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano, Italy
L. Gasparini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano, Italy
L. Vigevano
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A comparison between Full Potential and Euler numerical solutions for 2D transonic unsteady flow is presented. The pros and cons of the potential model are discussed and the main features of both computational methods are summarised. The comparison is done for a Naca 0012 aerofoil oscillating in pitch at a freestream Mach number ranging from 0·755 to 0·825, in order to investigate the limit of application of the potential approximation in an unsteady flow.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 98 , Issue 979 , November 1994 , pp. 340 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Steinhoff, J. and Jameson, A. Multiple solutions of the transonic potential flow equation, AIAA J, 1982, 20, (11), pp 1521–1525.Google Scholar
2. Salas, M.D., Jameson, A. and Melnik, R.E. A comparative study of the nonuniqueness problem of the potential equation, NASA TP 2385, 1985.Google Scholar
3. Salas, M.D. and Gumbert, C.R. Breakdown of the conservative potential equation, AIAA paper 85/0367, AIAA 23rd Aerospace Science Meeting, 1985.Google Scholar
4. Shankar, V., Ide, H., Gorsky, J. and Osher, S. A fast time-accurate unsteady full potential scheme, AIAA J, 1987, 25, (2), pp 230–238.Google Scholar
5. Osher, S., Hafez, M. and Whitlow, W. Jr Entropy condition satisfying approximations for the full potential equation of transonic flow, Math Comp, 1985, 44, (169), pp 1–29.Google Scholar
6. Ambrosi, D. Un metodo numerico per correnti comprimibili non stazionarie, PhD Dissertation (in Italian), Politecnico di Milano, 1993.Google Scholar
7. Leveque, R.J. Numerical methods for conservation laws, ETH Zurich lectures in mathematics, Birkhauser, 1990.Google Scholar
8. Roe, P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes, J Comput Phys, 1981, 43, pp 357–372.Google Scholar
9. Vinokur, M. An analysis of finite-difference and finite-volume formulations of conservation laws, J Comput Phys, 1989, 81, pp 1–52.10.1016/0021-9991(89)90063-6Google Scholar
10. Trepanier, J.Y., Reooio, M., Zhang, H. and Camarero, R. A finite volume method for the Euler equations on arbitrary Lagrangian- Eulerian grids, Computers and Fluids, 1991, 20, (4), pp 399–409.Google Scholar
11. Lax, P.D. and Wendroff, B. Systems of conservation laws, Comm Pure Appl Math, 1960, 13, pp 217–237.Google Scholar
12. Sweby, P.K. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J Num Anal, 1984, 21, pp 995–1011.Google Scholar
13. Harten, A. and Hyman, J.M. Self adjusting grid methods for one-dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws J Comput Phys, 1983, 50, pp 235–269.Google Scholar
14. Landon, R.H. Naca 0012 oscillatory and transient pitching, in “Compendium of unsteady aerodynamics measurements”, Agard Report 702, 1982.Google Scholar
15. Pulliam, T.H. Time accuracy and the use of implicit methods, AIAA-93-3360-CP, 1993.Google Scholar
16. Dowell, E.H., Ueda, T. and Goorjian, P.M. Transient decay times and mean values of unsteady oscillation in transonic flow, AIAA J, 1983, 21, (12), pp 1762–1764.Google Scholar
17.Williams, M.H., Bland, S.R. and Edwards, J.W. Flow instabilities in transonic small-disturbance theory, AIAA J, 1985, 23, (10), pp 1491–1496.Google Scholar