Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:14:32.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foaming and Aeration of Oils in Aviation Powerplant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

R. Tourret
R. Tourret*
Affiliation:
Thornton Research Centre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The presence of foam or unduly aerated oil in the lubricating-oil systems of aircraft power plant can be very troublesome—more so in reciprocating engines than in gas turbines, since the rates of circulation are greater and the viscosity grade of the oil is higher. Consequently in this paper, which surveys present knowledge about oil foaming, reciprocating engines are the main consideration.

In the conventional aircraft “dry-sump” oil system, a simplified diagram of which is shown in Fig. 1, oil is pumped from a supply tank to the bearings, and so on, by a so-called “pressure” pump. This oil then drains down into the sump and is picked up by “scavenge” pumps which return it to the supply tank. There are usually at least two scavenge pumps so that the oil is cleared away irrespective of the attitude of the aircraft.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 58 , Issue 517 , January 1954 , pp. 53 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tourret, R. and White, N. A. Aeration and Foaming in Lubricating Oil Systems. Aircraft Engineering, May 1952.Google Scholar
2. Sharp, N. Aero-Engine Oil Systems for Cold Climates. Aircraft Engineering, December 1951.Google Scholar
3. McBain, J. W., Ross, S., Brady, A. P., Robinson, J. V., Abrams, I. M., Thorburn, R. C. and Lindquist, C. C. Foaming of Aircraft-Engine Oils as a Problem in Colloid Chemistry, 1. N.A.C.A. A.R.R. No. 4105, September 1944, War-time Report No. W-52.Google Scholar
4. Pigott, R. J. S. Oil Aeration. S.A.E. Journal (Transactions), March 1944.Google Scholar
5. Robinson, J. V. Rise of Air Bubbles in Aircraft Lubricating Oils. N.A.C.A. T.N. 2033, 1950.Google Scholar
6. Gibbs, J. W. Collected Works, Yale University Press, 1928, or Longmans, Green & Co., London, 1930, p. 300.Google Scholar
7. Öhman, V. Foam and Foaming Liquids. Teknisk Tidskrift, Vol. 82, No. 14, 8th April 1952, p. 317. Abstracted in Engineers' Digest, September 1952.Google Scholar
8. Bartsch, O. Kolloidchem. Beih., Vol. 20, 1925, and Kolloid-Zeitschrift, Vol. 38, 1926, p. 178.Google Scholar
9. Foulk, C. W. and Miller, J. N. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 23, 1931, p. 1283.Google Scholar
10. Hardy, W. B. Proc Roy. Soc. A.86, 1912, p. 610.Google Scholar
11. Wilson, R. E. and Ries, E. D. Colloid Symposium Monograph I, University of Wisconsin, Vol. 1, 1923.Google Scholar
12. Talmud, D. and Suchowolskaja, S. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, Vol. A. 154, 1931, p. 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Trillat, J. J. Rev. Sci., Vol. 64, 1926, p. 552; Annalen der Physik., Vol. 10, 1926, p. 5; Acad. Sci., Comptes Rendus, Vol. 182, 1926, p . 843 and Vol. 187, 1928, p. 168.Google Scholar
14. Tausz, J. Zeitschrift für angewandte Chemie, Vol. 43, 1930, p . 570, and Erdöl und Teer, Vol. 9, 1933, p . 331.Google Scholar
15. Clark, G. L., Sterrett, R. R. and Lincoln, B. H. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 28, 1936.Google Scholar
16. Ambrose, H. A. and Trautman, C. E. Engine Oil Foaming. S.A.E. Journal, July 1945.Google Scholar
17. Schwartz, A. M. and Perry, J. W. Surface Active Agents. Interscience, 1949, p. 329.Google Scholar
18. Clark, N. O. and Blackman, M. The Degree of Dispersion of the Gas Phase in Foam. Trans. Faraday Soc, Vol. XLIV, Parts 1 and 2, Jan.-Feb. 1948.Google Scholar
19. Smith, C. S. Am. Inst. Mining Met. Engrs., Technical Publication No. 2387, 33 (1948)Google Scholar
20. Brady, A. P. and Ross, S. The Measurement of Foam Stability, Journal of American Chemical Soc., August 1944.Google Scholar
21. Hoffman, Von K. and Peter, H. Eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung der Schaumfähigkeit, und die Einführung einer mittleren Lebensdauer “T” zu ihrer Charakterisierung. Kolloid-Zeitschrift, 1941, 97, p. 161.Google Scholar
22. Campbell, G. A. Oil Aeration and Frothing. Flight, 29th July 1943.Google Scholar
23. Nealy, G. L. Foaming Characteristics of Gear Oils. S.A.E. Journal, May 1937.Google Scholar
24. Pigott, R. J. S. Preliminary Calculations on Air-Oil Performance of Spur-gear Pumps. Gulf Research and Development Co. Report No. KG-00, 13th April 1942, and Supplement No. KG-00-1, 17th January 1944.Google Scholar
25. Schweitzer, P. H. Effect of Aeration on Gear-Pump Delivery and Lubrication Ceiling. Trans. A.S.M.E., 1945, p. 123.Google Scholar
26. Pigott, R. J. S. Some Characteristics of Rotary Pumps in Aviation Service. Trans. A.S.M.E., Vol. 66, 1944, p. 615.Google Scholar
27. Hartesveldt, C. H. van. Low Flow Resistance needed in Pump Inlet. S.A.E. Journal (Transactions), March 1944.Google Scholar
28. Pinkel, I. I. Breaking Aircraft-Engine Oil Foams by Use of Electrically-charged Condenser Plates. N.A.C.A. A.R.R. No. E4K01, November 1944, War-time Report No. E-57.Google Scholar
29. Ross, S. Inhibition of Foaming, II. A Mechanism for the Rupture of Liquid Films by Anti-foaming Agents. Journal of Physical and Colloid Chemistry, March 1950.Google Scholar
30. Ross, S. The Inhibition of Foaming. Rensselaer Poly. Inst. Bulletin Eng. and Science, Series No. 63, May 1950.Google Scholar
31. Pattle, R. E. The Control of Foaming, I. The Mode of Action of Chemical Anti-foams. Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, December 1950.Google Scholar