Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:26:15.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flight simulation in academia HELIFLIGHT in its first year of operation at the University of Liverpool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. D. Padfield
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK
M. D. White
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK

Abstract

The challenges of helicopter simulation are being tackled across a broad front as technology is developed to meet the needs of Industry. Traditionally, the strongest impetus has come from the training community and this is likely to continue for some time as simulation technology advances at increasing pace, raising fidelity standards. The development of PC-based simulation technologies is providing a significant spur in this development and lowering the cost, making complete simulation systems of reasonably high fidelity available to smaller organisations. This paper describes the first year of operation with such a system at the University of Liverpool – HELIFLIGHT. With its full motion, wide field-of-view visuals, programmable force-feel system and the comprehensive FLIGHTLAB modelling environment, we describe the HELIFLIGHT system as high fidelity and the first year of utilisation saw extensive use in a variety of handling qualities and pilot-vehicle technology research and teaching. Some of these are described in the paper and from a year of many highlights, the EU-funded programme to develop handling qualities for a civil tilt rotor aircraft is selected to demonstrate the versatility of the HELIFLIGHT system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. DuVal, R.W., A real-time multi-body dynamics architecture for rotorcraft simulation, The challenge of realistic rotorcraft simulation, RAeS conference, November 2001, London.Google Scholar
2. Maxcue 600 Series Technical Data Sheet, Motionbase, October 1998.Google Scholar
3. Anon, , Aeronautical Design Standard-33E-PRF, Performance Specification, Handling Qualities Requirements for Military Rotorcraft, US Army AMCOM, Redstone, Alabama, 21 March, 2000.Google Scholar
4. Rollet, P., Rhilp – A major step for European knowledge for tilt rotor aeromechanics and flight dynamics, Jan 2001, Aeronautics Days 2001, Hamburg.Google Scholar
5. Harendra, P.B., et al A mathematical model for real-time flight simulation of the Bell model 301 tilt rotor research aircraft, April 1973, Bell Helicopter Report No 301-099-001.Google Scholar
6. Schillings, J.J., Roberts, B.R., Wood, T.L. and Wernicke, K.G., Manoeuvre performance comparison between the XV-15 and an advanced tiltrotor design, J Amer Helicopter soc. May 1980.Google Scholar
7. McRuer, D.T. et al Understanding and Preventing Unfavourable Pilot-Vehicle Interactions, Aviation Safety and Pilot Control, NRC, National Ac Press, Washington, 1997.Google Scholar
8. Meyer, M.A., Padfield, G.D., First Steps in the development of handling qualities criteria for a civil tilt rotor, AHS 58th Annual Forum, June 2002, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
9. Schroeder, J.A., Helicopter flight simulation motion platform requirements, NASA/TP-1999-208766, July 1999.Google Scholar
10. Padfield, G.D., Lee, D.N. and Bradley, R., How do helicopter pilots know when to stop, turn or pull up? (Developing guidelines for vision aids), Proceedings of the 57th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington DC, May 2001.Google Scholar
11. Padfield, G.D., Manimala, B. and Turner, G.P., A hazard analysis for rotorcraft encounters with aircraft vortex wakes, 28th European Rotorcraft Forum, Sept 2002, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar