Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:49:33.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental determination of the aerodynamic characteristics of ski-jumpers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. J. Ward-Smith  and
D. Clements
A. J. Ward-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brunei University, Uxbridge
D. Clements
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brunei University, Uxbridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aerodynamic pitching moment, lift and drag forces acting on a ski-jumper during the free flight and landing phases were measured using scaled models in a wind tunnel. Comparisons are made between those meaurements and observations of actual ski-jumps.

It is shown that the high angles of incidence (typically α varies from 35° to 55°) adopted by ski-jumpers during free flight is determined by the need to prevent tumbling. Over this range of incidence angles, the opposing moments due to weight distribution and aerodynamic pressure distribution are approximately in equilibrium, and small out-of-balance moments can be accommodated by arm movements. The maximum lift/drag ratio on a ski-jumper in free flight occurs at α ≃ 25°. If it were possible to avoid tumbling at low incidence angles, maximum jump lengths would be achieved at α ≃ 8°.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 86 , Issue 860 , December 1982 , pp. 384 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1982 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Clements, D. The aerodynamic forces acting on a ski-jumper. Brunei University Project Report (unpublished) 1981.Google Scholar
2. Pryor, S. J. The trajectory of objects subject to aerodynamic forces. Section 2: Ski jumpers. Brunei University Project Report (unpublished) 1980.Google Scholar
3. Raine, A. E. Aerodynamics of skiing. Science Journal. March 1970, 6, No 3, 26–30.Google Scholar
4. Maskell, E. C. A theory of the blockage effects on bluff bodies and stalled wings in a closed wind tunnel ARC. R&M 3400, 1965.Google Scholar
5. Hoerner, S. F. Aerodynamic Drag, 1951.Google Scholar