Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:47:54.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental and numerical aerodynamic analysis of a satellite launch vehicle with strap-on boosters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

M. Mani ,
A. Naghib-Lahouti  and
M. Nazarinia
M. Mani
Affiliation:
Aerospace Research Institute and Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
A. Naghib-Lahouti
Affiliation:
Aerospace Research Institute and Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
M. Nazarinia
Affiliation:
Aerospace Research Institute and Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results of numerical simulation of inviscid compressible flow around a generic satellite launch vehicle (SLV) with strap-on boosters using a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code named Star-CD are experimentally evaluated. Governing equations of flow around the SLV with two and two strap-on boosters were solved in three dimensions using the SIMPLE algorithm in an unstructured tetrahedral mesh, to determine longitudinal aerodynamic coefficients and surface pressure distribution at Mach numbers from 0·6 to 2·0, and angles-of-attack from 0° to 16°. To evaluate the numerical results, 1:100th scale models of the SLV were tested in a trisonic wind tunnel in the same configurations and flow conditions as those analysed numerically. Comparison of results shows reasonable agreement between numerical and experimental values, however, drag coefficients had to be corrected to compensate the effects of base flow and the struts connecting the boosters to the core rocket. This evaluation shows that a relatively simple simulation of flow using a commercial CFD code can be considered an efficient tool for prediction of aerodynamic characteristics of a multi body satellite launch vehicle with a level of accuracy acceptable in the process of preliminary aerodynamic design.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 108 , Issue 1085 , July 2004 , pp. 379 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Malina, F.J. and Summerfield, M. The problem of escape from the earth by rocket, J Aero Sci, August 1947, 14, pp 476–478.Google Scholar
2. Isakowitz, S.J. The International Reference Guide to Space Launch Systems, 3rd Ed, AIAA, USA, 1999.Google Scholar
3. Mendenhall, M.R. et al Integrated aerodynamic design and analysis of launch vehicles, AIAA Paper, 2001, AIAA-2001-0263.Google Scholar
4. Nielsen, J.N. Missile Aerodynamics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, USA, 1960.Google Scholar
5. Naghib-Lahouti, A., Nejat, A. and Khadivi, T. Parametric analysis of aerodynamic characteristics of launch vehicles with strap-on boosters, Proc ICAS 2002 Conference, Toronto, Canada, September 2002.Google Scholar
6. Mendenhall, M.R. et al, Aerodynamic design and analysis of a reusable launch vehicle, Proc ICAS 2000 Conference, Harrogate, UK, August 2000.Google Scholar
7. Devasia, K.J. et al, Investigation of inviscid flow field interference effects in strap-on configurations using panel method, Proc 13th Int. Symposium on Space Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan, June 1982.Google Scholar
8. Singh, K.P. et al, Numerical simulation of inviscid supersonic flows over a launch vehicle with strap-on boosters, AIAA Paper, 1987, AIAA-87-0213-CP.Google Scholar
9. Zhang, Lumin, Zechu, Yu and Yan, Yongjian, Numerical simulation of inviscid supersonic flow over multiple bodies.7 AIAA Paper, AIAA-90-3099-CP, 1990.Google Scholar
10. Barlow, J.B., Rae, W.H. and Pope, A. Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing. 3rd Ed, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 1999.Google Scholar
11. Anon, Methodology: Star-CD version 3.15, Computational Dynamics Limited, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
12. Anderson, J.D. Modern Compressible Flow with Historical Perspective, 2nd Ed, McGraw-Hill, USA, 1990.Google Scholar