Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:02:27.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exact pitch and heave flutter for the complex Theodorsen function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

S.P. Farthing*
Affiliation:
Wing’d Pump N. Saanich, BCCanada

Abstract

Concepts of new fluttering wind and water mills led to general solution of flutter by a foil section free to pitch about an axis ahead of ${1}/{4}$ chord. The pitch damping of the vorticity being shed by lift change is negative singular via the imaginary part of the Theodorsen function. So a 2D airfoil can slowly flutter in pure pitch at a very high inertia with radian frequency and growth rate, reduced by windspeed/chord, resp. less than .087 and .01. At the frequency of nil net pitch damping, the binary inertia/damping cross determinant vanishes on a line in the imbalance vs inertia plane. The perturbed frequency contours just a bit above and below this ‘beab’ line spectacularly split to asymptote to the pure pitch inertia vertical of implied infinite heave stiffness. Higher frequency contours turn back towards the positive imbalance axis and then the origin, changing from hyperbolic to elliptical at exactly the same .087 and asymptoting to a line between the nexus and four times the nexus and a mode of effective pitch about ${3}/{4}$ chord. At .6 the pure pitch frequency the imaginary part dominates in the quadratic inertia and imbalance coefficients to bend the neutral contours down and across the quasi-steady line to even turn back to very large negative imbalance at small inertia, where kinematics then imply high mass. Diagonally mirror hyperbolae exist for greater than the pure pitch inertia with a different dynamic implication of very high foil mass.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Duncan, J.W. The fundamentals of flutter, Ae.Res.Co. R&M No. 2417, Nov., 1948, pp 136.Google Scholar
Farthing, S.P. Wing’d pumps, 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zIj7LCtX0U.Google Scholar
Farthing, S.P. Binary flutter as an oscillating windmill – scaling and linear analysis, Wind Engineering, 2013, 37, (5), pp 483499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farthing, S.P. The flutter wing windpumps: design, nonlinearities, & measurements, Wind Engineering, 2014, 38, (2), pp 217231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farthing, S.P. FWP leading edge smoke, 2008. youtube.com/watch?v=16kB6p-kcC0.Google Scholar
Ashley, H.A., Dugundji, J. and Henry, C.J. Aeroelastic stability of lifting surfaces in high-density fluids, Journal Ship Research 1959, 3, (1), pp 1028.Google Scholar
Farthing, S.P. Binary flutter solution for fluid power, Journal of Aerospace Engineering (ASCE), 2018, 31, (3), p 04018009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M.J., Notes on Fluttering Wing Concept Private Communication, 1979.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (Eds) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Dover Press, 1972, New York, p 378 (130) and p 375 (127), ISBN 978-0-486-61272-0.Google Scholar
Jones, W.P. The generalized theodorsen function, Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1952 19, (3), pp 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farthing, S.P. Binary flutter in water, 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDm78DOcEOM.Google Scholar
Farthing, S.P. Oscillating lift and pitch and heave flutter contours for finite rectangular wing, to be submitted to AIAA Journal.Google Scholar