Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:17:00.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy partitioning in high speed impact of analogue solid rocket motors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

W. P. Schonberg*
Affiliation:
Civil Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Missouri-RollaRolla, Missouri, USA

Abstract

Modelling the response of solid rocket motors to bullet and fragment impacts is a high priority among the military services from standpoints of both safety and mission effectiveness. Considerable effort is being devoted to characterising the bullet and fragment vulnerability of solid rocket motors, and to developing solid rocket motor case technologies for preventing or lessening the violent responses of rocket motors to these impact loadings. Because full-scale tests are costly, fast-running analytical methods are required to characterise the response of solid rocket motors to ballistic impact hazards. In this study, a theoretical first-principles-based model is developed to determine the partitioning of the kinetic energy of an impacting projectile among various solid rocket motor failure modes. Failure modes considered in the analyses include case perforation, case delamination, and fragmentation of the propellant simulant material. Energies involved in material fragmentation are calculated using a fragmentation scheme based on a procedure developed in a previous impact study utilising propellant simulant material. The model is found to be capable of predicting a variety of response characteristics for analogue solid rocket motors under high speed projectile impact that are consistent with observed response characteristics. Suggestions are made for improving the model and extending its applicability to a wider class of impact scenarios.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bullet and Fragment Impact Hazards to Solid Rocket Motors, CPIA Report No SP 92-06, Washington, DC, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Finnegan, S.A., Prinole, J.K., Schulz, J.C., Heimdahl, O.E.R. and Lindfors, A.J. Impact-induced delayed detonation in an energetic material debris bubble formed at an air gap, Int J Impact Engng, 1993, 14, pp 241254.Google Scholar
3. Yuan, W., Goldsmith, W., Radin, J. and Tauber, Z. Response of simulated propellant and explosives to projectile impact — I. Material behavior and penetration studies, Int J Impact Engng, 1992, 12, (4), pp 475-497.Google Scholar
4. Yuan, W. and Goldsmith, W. Response of simulated propellant and explosives to projectile impact — II. Fragmentation, Int J Impact Engng, 1992,12, (4), pp 499531.Google Scholar
5. Yuan, W. and Goldsmith, W. Response of simulated propellant and explosives to projectile impact — III. Experimental and numerical results of warhead penetration and fragmentation, Int J Impact Engng, 1992,12, (4), pp 533558.Google Scholar
6. Demay, S.C. An overview of the US Navy IMAD propellant technology initiatives, in Bullet and Fragment Impact Hazards to Solid Rocket Motors, CPIA Report No SP 92-06, Washington, DC, 1992, pp 89106.Google Scholar
7. Lindfors, A.J., Schulz, J.C. and Finnegan, S.A. Plate curvature effects on ballistic limit and fragmentation, in Proceedings of the 12th International Ballistics Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, 29 October to 1 November 1990, 3, pp 159-167.Google Scholar
8. Conkwright, N.B. Introduction to the Theory of Equations, Ginn and Co, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
9. Awerbuch, J. A mechanics approach to projectile penetration, Israel J of Tech, 1970, 8, (4), pp 375383.Google Scholar
10. Pierson, M.O., Delfosse, D., Vaziri, R. and Poursarti, A. Penetration of laminated composite plates due to impact, in Proceedings of the 14th International Ballistics Symposium, Quebec, Canada, 26-29 September 1993, 2, pp 351-360.Google Scholar
11. Malvern, L.E., Sierakowski, R.L., Ross, C.A. and Cristescu, N. Impact failure mechanisms in fiber-reinforced composite plates, in High Velocity Deformation of Solids, IUTAM Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, August 1977, pp 120-130.Google Scholar
12. Abrate, S. Impact on Composite Structures, Cambridge University Press, England, 1998.Google Scholar