Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:06:20.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of vertical profile inefficiency during descent on fuel burn, emissions and flight time

Part of: Sustainable Aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2018

H. Aksoy ,
O. Usanmaz  and
E. T. Turgut
H. Aksoy*
Affiliation:
Department of Air Traffic Control, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey
O. Usanmaz
Affiliation:
Department of Air Traffic Control, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey
E. T. Turgut
Affiliation:
Department of Airframe and Powerplant Maintenance, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vertical profile inefficiency caused by low-level flight segments during arrival and departure operations has a great impact on the financial cost of operators as well as negative environmental effects. In this regard, continuous descent and climb operations for arrival and departure phases are mostly preferred as one of the methods that reduce or eliminate vertical profile inefficiencies. In this study, focus is put on the arrival phase and the purpose is: (i) to analyse the vertical profiles of arrival traffic at Mugla Milas-Bodrum Airport (BJV), Antalya Airport (AYT) and Ankara Esenboga Airport (ESB) and to characterise the level-offs that occur in the arrival phase and (ii) to quantify the potential time, fuel and emission savings in the event of a shift of inefficient low-level flight segments to the cruise segment of equal distance. For the purpose of this paper, real-time flight data is used for the analysis of the vertical profiles of flights. Flight parameters, such as latitude, longitude, altitude, speed and so on are used to determine, visualise and characterise level-off segments. The Boeing Fuel Flow Method 2 is used to calculate emissions at any altitude. Analyses of the results show that 80%, 74% and 69% of arrival traffic at BJV, AYT and ESB, respectively. were exposed to at least one level-off lasting longer than 20 seconds and significant potential for time, fuel and emissions savings exist for three airports.

Keywords

Vertical profile inefficiencyCDA operationsCCO operationsfuel consumptionemissions
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 122 , Issue 1252 , June 2018 , pp. 913 - 932
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lee, D.S., Pitari, G., Grewe, V., Gierens, K., Penner, J.E., Petzold, A. and Lachetti, D. Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Aviation, Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44, (37), pp 4678-4734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Goodish, T. Air Quality, 2004, Levis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, US, pp 34-72.Google Scholar
3. Lee, J. and Mo, J. Analysis of technological innovation and environmental performance improvement in aviation sector, Int J Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011, 8, (9), pp 3777-3795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. ICAO, Doc 9931 Continuous Descent Operations Manual, 1st ed., 2010, ICAO Publications, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
5. Clarke, J.P.B. Systems analysis of noise abatement procedures enabled by advanced flight guidance technology, J Aircr, 2000, 37, (2), pp 266-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Warren, A. and Tong, K.O. Development of continuous descent approach concepts for noise abatement [ATC], Digital Avionics Systems Conference, October 2002, IEEE, Irvine, California, US.Google Scholar
7. Reynolds, T.G., Ren, L., Clarke, J.B., Burke, A.S. and Green, M. History, development and analysis of noise abatement arrival procedures for UK airports, AIAA Fifth Aviation, Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, September 2005, Arlington, Virginia, US, pp 26-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. ICAO, Doc 9993 Continuous Climb Operations Manual, 1st ed., 2013, ICAO Publications, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
9. Kettunen, T., Hustache, J., Fuller, I., Howell, D. and Bonn, J. Flight efficiency studies in Europe and the United States, 6th USA/Europe Seminar on ATM Research and Development, June 2005, Baltimore, Maryland, US.Google Scholar
10. Reynolds, T.G. Analysis of lateral flight inefficiency in global air traffic management, 8th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, September 2008, Anchorage, Alaska, US.Google Scholar
11. Alcabin, M., Schwab, R. W., Soncrant, C., Tong, K.O. and Cheng, S.S. Measuring vertical flight path efficiency in the national airspace system, 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO), September 2009, Hilton Head, South Carolina, US.Google Scholar
12. Dorfman, S., Daily, J., Gonzalez, T. and Kondo, G. S. NAS-wide vertical profile analysis: Level segments in arrival and departure flows, Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), April 2012, IEEE.Google Scholar
13. Belle, A., Sherry, L., Wambsganss, M. and Mukhina, A. A methodology for airport arrival flow analysis using track data - A case study for MDW arrivals, Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS), April 2013, IEEE, Herndon, Virginia, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Reynolds, T.G. Air traffic management performance assessment using flight inefficiency metrics, Transport Policy, July 2014, 34, pp 63-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Dearmon, J., Mahashabde, A. and Hogan, B. Departure flow efficiency and the identification of causes for inefficiencies, Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), October 2014, IEEE, Colorado Springs, Colorado, US.Google Scholar
16. Eurocontrol Performance Review Unit, Vertical flight efficiency during climb and descent, 2016. Available at http://ansperformance.eu/studies/cco-cdo/ (accessed 20 March 2017).Google Scholar
17. Peeters, S., Koelman, H., Koelle, R., Galaviz-Schomisch, R., Gulding, J. and Meekma, M. Towards a common analysis of vertical flight efficiency, Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance (ICNS), April 2016, IEEE, Herndon, Virginia, US.Google Scholar
18. Sprong, K.R., Klein, K.A., Shiotsuki, C., Arrighi, J. and Liu, S. Analysis of AIRE continuous descent arrival operations at Atlanta and Miami, Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), October 2008, IEEE, St. Paul, Minnesota, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Stibor, J. and Nyberg, A. Implementation of continuous descent approaches at Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Sweden, Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), October 2009, IEEE, Orlando, Florida, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Shresta, S., Neskovic, D. and Williams, S. Analysis of continuous descent benefits and impacts during daytime operations, 8th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, July 2009, Napa, California, US.Google Scholar
21. Turgut, E.T., Usanmaz, O., Canarslanlar, A.O. and Sahin, O. Energy and emission assessments of continuous descent approach, Aircr Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2010, 82, (1), pp 32-38.Google Scholar
22. Thompson, T., Mille, B., Murphy, C., Augustine, S., White, T. and Souihi, S. Environmental impacts of continuous-descent operations in Paris and New York regions, 10th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, June 2013, Chicago, Illinois, US.Google Scholar
23. Jin, L., Cao, Y. and Sun, D. Investigation of potential fuel savings due to continuous-descent approach, J Aircr, 2013, 50, (3), pp 807-816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Clarke, J.P., Brooks, J., Nagle, G., Scacchioli, A., White, W. and Liu, S.R. Optimized profile descent arrivals at Los Angeles international airport, J Aircr, 2013, 50, (2), pp 360-369.Google Scholar
25. Roach, K. and Robinson, J. A terminal area analysis of continuous ascent departure fuel use at Dallas-FortWorth International Airport, 10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO), September 2010, Fort Worth, Texas, US.Google Scholar
26. McConnachie, D., Bonnefoy, P. and Belle, A. Investigating benefits from continuous climb operating concepts in the national airspace system, 11th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, June 2015, Boston, Massachusetts, US.Google Scholar
27. DHMI, Statistics, Available at: http://www.dhmi.gov.tr/istatistik.aspx [accessed 20 March 2017].Google Scholar
28. DHMI, AIP Turkey Aerodromes, General Directorate of State Airports Authority, Ankara, Turkey, 2015.Google Scholar
29. Schaefer, M. Methodologies for Aviation Emission Calculation – A Comparison of Alternative Approaches towards 4D Global Inventories, MSc thesis, December 2006, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
30. Turgut, E.T. and Rosen, M.A. Assessment of emissions at busy airports, Int J Energy Research, 2010, 34, (9), pp 800-814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Masiol, M. and Harrison, R.M. Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airport-related contributions to ambient air pollution: A review, Atmospheric Environment, 2014, 95, pp 409-455.Google Scholar
32. Dubois, D. and Paynter, G.C. Fuel flow method 2 for estimating aircraft emissions, 2006, SAE Technical Paper, No. 2006-01-1987.Google Scholar
33. Kendal, E.A, Interpolation, 2003. Available at: http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~atkinson/ftp/ENA_Materials/Overheads/sec_4-1.pdf (accessed 20 March 2017).Google Scholar
34. Rudey, R.A. and Kempke, E.E. Technology for reducing aircraft engine pollution, 1975, NASA Technical Paper, No. NASA TM X-71670.Google Scholar
35. FAA OFFICE of ENVIRONMENT and ENERGY, Aviation emissions, Impacts & Mitigation A Primer, 2015. available at: https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/policy_guidance/envir_policy/media/Primer_January2015.pdf (accessed 20 March 2017).Google Scholar
36. ICAO, ICAO aircraft engine emissions databank, 2015. Available at: https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/icao-aircraft-engine-emissions-databank#group-easa-downloads (accessed 20 March 2017).Google Scholar