No CrossRef data available.
Report by a Working Party of the Education Committee of the Society
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2016
The Working Party considered the objects of professional training and of technical education and the parts played by both academic studies and by practical experience; these deliberations led them to a consideration of how the Diploma in Technology helped to achieve these objects. The content of both the academic studies and industrial training parts of the Diploma course was studied. Conclusions reached included the following:—
(a) Close liaison between lecturing staff and professional engineers is vital.
(b) Standards of supervision and staff engaged in industrial training should be similar to those found in academic studies.
(c) The Training Boards should initiate bodies in which the industry and the professional institutions co-operate with colleges in the maintenance of standards of industrial training.
(d) Attempts to assess and grade students on their industrial training should be approached with caution.
(e) Suggestions are made as to the form of projects to be undertaken by Diploma Students.
(f) It is neither necessary nor practical to integrate each part of the studies and practical training in detail.
(g) The Working Party is whole-heartedly in favour of the sandwich arrangement of courses and makes suggestions for the best lay-out.
(h) Recommendations are made concerning the qualification to be given for successful completion of the Diploma in Technology course; it is concluded that this should differ from that given for the normal full time degree course.
The Working Party concludes by making recommendations for further action.
Note on page 713 * The report uses the term “Diploma in Technology” to mean the four-year sandwich scheme carrying that name at the time the report was written (May 1964). Implementation of the Robbins Report may lead to changes.