Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:14:14.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Corrosion and Protection of Magnesium and its Light Alloys*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Extract

The chemist regards magnesium as a highly reactive metal for such reasons as the inflammability of its powder or foil in air, its active displacement of hydrogen gas from many aqueous chloride solutions and its position near the reactive end of the electrode-potential series. All these suggest that the metal would be unsuitable for constructional engineering. Yet engineers use alloys, rich in magnesium, up to 98 per cent. of the metal, for an increasing number of services, although the alloying elements do not, as a rule, greatly cut down, and may even increase, the corrosion rate. Their industrial use is possible because the liability to corrode, reckoned over a reasonably prolonged period, is not a definite property of a metal such as conductivity which is subject only to relatively small changes with alteration of environment, but is highly specific to metal-liquid and metal-gas systems. Moreover, these systems may undergo important changes with time owing to the intervention of films of corrosion products, and the rate of attack may be governed by the physical characteristics of these films which will vary with the adjacent liquid and gases. Thus in stagnant caustic alkalies magnesium may be reckoned as almost incorrodible because of the intervention of a film of hydroxide of the self-healing type which, in these conditions, is highly impervious to magnesium ions; but in the presence of alkali chlorides the corrosion product is physically different and rapid corrosion occurs. Many dilute acids attack magnesium rapidly but hydrofluoric acid scarcely at all, no doubt owing to the formation of a protective film of fluoride.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Paper read before the Institution of Chemical Engineers, December 8th, 1933, and reprinted by special permission of the Institution.

References

1. Whitby, L. Trans. Faraday Soc., 29, 853, 1933.Google Scholar
2. Whitby, L. J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 50, 83T., 1931.Google Scholar
3. Whitby, L. Trans. Faraday Soc., 29, 844, 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Whitby, L. ibid, 29, 415, 1933.Google Scholar
5. Bengough, G. D., and Whitby, L. J. Inst. Metals, 48, No. 1, 147, 1932; Eng. Pat., 378,916.Google Scholar
6. Hertzog, E., and Chaudron, G. Compt. rend., 189, 1087, 1929; Chemie et Industrie, Spec. No. 335, 1929.Google Scholar
7. Portevin, A., and Bastien, P. Génie Civil., June 4, 1932.Google Scholar
8. Boyer, J. A. U.S. Natl. Adv. Comm. Aeronautics, Report No. 248, 1925.Google Scholar
9. Portevin, A., and Pretet, E. Compt. rend., 185, 125, 1927; Rev. Met., 26, 259, 1929.Google Scholar
10. Eng. Pat. 328, 485.Google Scholar
11. Sutton, H., and Le Brocq, L. F. J. Inst. Metals, 46, No. 2, 54, 1931.Google Scholar
12. Eng. Pat., 287,450.Google Scholar
13. Whitley, L. Trans. Faraday Soc., 29, 1318, 1933.Google Scholar