Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:49:26.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Australian Sounding Rockets Long Tom and Aeolus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. A. H. Bird
D. A. H. Bird*
Affiliation:
Flight Projects Group, Weapons Research Establishment, South Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The advent of the Skylark firings and the more recent trials of ballistic missiles such as the Black Knight firings, have demanded a continuous development of both ground and airborne instrumentation at Woomera Range; this in turn has raised the need for sighter rockets and instrumentation test vehicles with altitude capabilities in the 200,000-500,000 ft. range.

The need is currently being met by the rocket vehicles Long Tom and Aeolus. These rockets are of interest because they represent the first designed and built at W.R.E. that can be classed as high altitude rockets; also, they make possible the provision of relatively cheap and readily available vehicles for upper atmosphere research.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 64 , Issue 593 , May 1960 , pp. 277 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Boswell, R. W. M. (1958). Guided Flight Trials. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 62, No. 570, June 1958.Google Scholar
2.Dorling, E. B. (1959). Skylark, A High Altitude Research Rocket. Discovery, March 1959.Google Scholar
3.Kopal, Z. (1947). Tables of Supersonic Flow Around Cones. M.I.T. Technical Report 1, 1947.Google Scholar
4.Bishop, R. A. and Cane, E. G. (1956). Charts of the Theoretical Wave Drag of Wings at Zero-lift. R.A.E. Tech. Note Aero 2321, June 1956.Google Scholar
5.Monaghan, R. and Johnson, J. E. (1949). The Measure ment of Heat Transfer and Skin Friction at Supersonic Speeds. Part II, R.A.E. Tech. Note. Aero 2031, December 1949.Google Scholar
6.Love, E. S. (1957). Base Pressure at Supersonic Speeds on Two Dimensional Airfoils and on Bodies of Revolution with and without Fins having Turbulent Boundary Layers. N.A.C.A. Tech. Note 3819, January 1957.Google Scholar
7.Cortright, E. M. (1956). Some Aerodynamic Considera tions of Nozzle-After Body Combinations. Aeronautical Engineering Review, Vol. 15, No. 9, September 1956.Google Scholar
8.Pitts, W. C, Nielsen, J. N. and Kaattari, G. E. (1957). Lift and Centre of Pressure of Wing-Body-Tail Combina tions at Subsonic, Transonic and Supersonic Speeds. N.A.C.A. Report 1307, 1957.Google Scholar
9.Allen, H. J. and Perkins, E. W. (1951). A Study of Effects of Viscosity on Flow over Slender Inclined Bodies of Revolution. N.A.C.A. Report 1048, 1951.Google Scholar
10.Buford, W. F. (1958). The Effects of After Body Length and Mach Number on the Normal Force and Centre of Pressure of Conical and Ogival Nose Bodies. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 2, February 1958.Google Scholar
11.Syvertson, C. A. and Dennis, D. H. (1957). A Second- Order Shock Expansion Method Applicable to Bodies of Revolution near Zero Lift. N.A.C.A. Report, 1328, 1957.Google Scholar
12.Phythian, J. E. and Dommett, R. L. (1958). Semi-empirical Methods of Estimating Forces on Bodies at Supersonic Speeds. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 62, No. 571, July 1958.Google Scholar